2,599
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Agenda setting and active audiences in online coverage of human traffickingFootnote

, &
Pages 655-672 | Received 17 Oct 2015, Accepted 28 Dec 2015, Published online: 05 Feb 2016

References

  • Aronowitz, A. A. (2009). Human trafficking, human misery: The global trade in human beings. Westport, CT: Preager Publishers.
  • Bastos, M. T., & Puschmann, C. (2013). GuardianR: Guardian Api wrapper. London: CRAN. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/GuardianR/
  • Berry, M. W., Dumais, S. T., & O'Brien, G. W. (1995). Using linear algebra for intelligent information retrieval. SIAM Review, 37(4), 573–595.
  • Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.
  • Brysk, A., & Choi-Fitzpatrick, A. (Eds.). (2012). From human trafficking to human rights: Reframing contemporary slavery. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Burstein, P. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56(1), 29–40.
  • Busza, J. (2004). Sex work and migration: The dangers of oversimplification-a case study of Vietnamese women in Cambodia. Health and Human Rights, 7(2), 231–249.
  • Cai, D., Mei, Q., Han, J., & Zhai, C. (2008, October 26–30). Modeling hidden topics on document manifold. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on information and knowledge management (CIKM) Napa Valley, CA (pp. 911–920). New York, NY: ACM.
  • Chang, G., & Kim, K. (2007). Reconceptualizing approaches to human trafficking: New directions and perspectives from the field(s). Stanford Journal of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, 3(2), 1–28. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1051601
  • Chuang, J., Wilkerson, J. D., Weiss, R., Tingley, D., Stewart, B. M., Roberts, M. E, … Heer, J. (2014, December). Computer-assisted content analysis: Topic models for exploring multiple subjective interpretations. Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), Workshop on Human-Propelled Machine Learning, Montreal, Canada.
  • Coleman, R., McCombs, M., Shaw, D., & Weaver, D. (2009). Agenda setting. In T. Hanitzsch & K. Wahl-Jorgensen (Eds.), Handbook of journalism studies (pp. 147–160). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Cormen, T. H., Leiserson, C. E., & Rivest, R. L. (1996). Introduction to algorithms. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 329–355.
  • Dalton, R. J. (2013). Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies. Los Angeles, CA: CQ Press.
  • Danailova-Trainor, G., & Belser, P. (2006). Globalization and the illicit market for human trafficking: An empirical analysis of supply and demand. International Labour Office InFocus Programme on promoting the declaration on fundamental principles and rights at work. Retrieved July 4, 2015, from http://natlex.ilo.ch/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---declaration/documents/publication/wcms_081931.pdf
  • Deerwester, S. C., Dumais, S. T., Landauer, T. K., Furnas, G. W., & Harshman, R. A. (1990). Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 391–407.
  • Deuze, M. (2003). The web and its journalisms: Considering the consequences of different types of newsmedia online. New Media & Society, 5(2), 203–230.
  • DiMaggio, P., Nag, M., & Blei, D. (2013). Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of US government arts funding. Poetics, 41(6), 570–606.
  • Ditmore, M. H. (2011). Prostitution and sex work. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood.
  • Doezema, J. (1998). Forced to choose: Beyond the voluntary vs. forced prostitution dichotomy. In K. Kempadoo & J. Deozema (Eds.), Global sex workers: Rights resistance and redefinition (pp. 34–50). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Doezema, J. (1999). Loose women or lost women? The re-emergence of the myth of white slavery in contemporary discourses of trafficking in women. Gender Issues, 18, 23–50
  • Doezema, J. (2002). Who gets to choose? Coercion consent and the UN 92 trafficking protocol. Gender & Development, 10(1), 20–27.
  • Domingo, D., Quandt, T., Heinonen, A., Paulussen, S., Singer, J., & Vujnovic, M. (2008). Participatory journalism practices in the media and beyond. Journalism Practice, 2(3), 326–342.
  • Dowler, K., Fleming, T., & Muzzatti, S. L. (2006). Constructing crime: Media crime and popular culture. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 48(6), 837–850.
  • Dumais, S. T. (2004). Latent semantic analysis. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38(1), 188–230.
  • Evangelopoulos, N., Zhang, X., & Prybutok, V. (2012). Latent semantic analysis: Five methodological recommendations. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(1), 70–86.
  • Farley, M. (2006). Prostitution, trafficking, and cultural amnesia: What we must not know in order to keep the business of sexual exploitation running smoothly. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 18, 109–144.
  • Farrell, A., & Fahy, S. (2009). The problem of human trafficking in the US: Public frames and policy responses. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(6), 617–626.
  • Farrell, A., McDevitt, J., & Fahy, S. (2010). Where are all the victims? Criminology & Public Policy, 9(2), 201–233.
  • Foltz, P. W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T. K. (1998). The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25(2–3), 285–307.
  • Gallagher, A. (2001). Human rights and human trafficking: A reflection on the influence and evolution of the U.S. trafficking in persons. Report at Brysk, A., & Choi-Fitzpatrick, A. (Eds.). (2012). From human trafficking to human rights: Reframing contemporary slavery. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Ghanem, S. (1997). Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda setting. In M. McCombs, D. Shaw, & D. Weaver (Eds.), Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda setting theory (pp. 3–14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Graham, T., & Wright, S. (2015). A tale of two stories from ‘below the line’ comment fields at the guardian. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 20(3), 317–338.
  • Greer, C. (2007). News media victims and crime in Victims crime and society davies. In P. Davies, P. Francis, & C. Greer (Eds.), Victims, crime and society (pp. 20–49). London: SAGE.
  • Gulati, J. (2010). Media representation of human trafficking in the United States, Great Britain and Canada. Social Science Research Network. Retrieved April 22, 2014, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1633574
  • Gulati, J. (2011). News frames and story triggers in the media's coverage of human trafficking. Human Rights Review, 12(3), 363–379.
  • Gulcur, L., & Ilkkaracan, P. (2002). The ‘Natasha’ experience: Migrant sex workers from the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe in Turkey. Women's Studies International Forum, 25(4), 411–421.
  • Haas, T. (2005). From ‘public journalism’ to the ‘public's journalism’? Rhetoric and reality in the discourse on weblogs. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 387–396.
  • Haas, T. (2007). The pursuit of public journalism: Theory, practice, and criticism. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Haynes, D. F. (2006). (Not) found chained to a bed in a brothel: Conceptual, legal, and procedural failures to fullfill the promise of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act. Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 21, 337–381.
  • Hermida, A., Domingo, D., Heinonen, A., Paulussen, S., Quandt, T., Reich, Z., & Vujnovic, M. (2011, April 1–2). The active recipient: Participatory journalism through the lens of the Dewey-Lippmann debate. Paper presented to International Symposium on Online Journalism 2011, University of Texas, Austin, Austin.
  • Hermida, A., & Thurman, N. (2007, March 30–31). Comments please: How the British news media are struggling with user-generated content. Paper presented in 8th international symposium on online journalism 2007, University of Texas, Austin.
  • Höijer, B. (2004). The discourse of global compassion: The audience and media reporting of human suffering. Media, Culture & Society, 26(4), 513–531.
  • Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
  • Immordino, G., & Russo, F. F. (2015). Laws and stigma: The case of prostitution. European Journal of Law and Economics, 40, 209–223.
  • Jacobson, S. (2013). Does audience participation on Facebook influence the news agenda? A case study of the Rachel Maddow show. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(3), 338–355.
  • Jahic, G., & Finckenauer, J. O. (2005). Representations and misrepresentations of human trafficking. Trends in Organized Crime, 8(3), 24–40.
  • Jeffreys, S. (1999). Globalizing sexual exploitation: Sex tourism and the traffic in women. Leisure Studies, 18, 179–196.
  • Johnston, A., Friedman, B., & Shafer, A. (2014). Framing the problem of sex trafficking: Whose problem? What remedy? Feminist Media Studies, 14(3), 419–436.
  • Jönsson, A. M., & Örnebring, H. (2011). User-generated content and the news: Empowerment of citizens or interactive illusion? Journalism Practice, 5(2), 127–144.
  • Kelly, L. (2003). The wrong debate: Reflections on why force is not the key issue with respect to trafficking in women for sexual exploitation. Feminist Review, 73, 139–144.
  • Kiousis, S., Mitrook, M., & Wu, X. (2006). First- and second-level agenda-building and agenda-setting effects: Exploring the linkages among candidate news releases media coverage and public opinion during the 2002 Florida gubernatorial election. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18(3), 265–285.
  • Kulkarni, S., Apte, U., & Evangelopoulos, N. (2014). The use of latent semantic analysis in operations management research. Decision Sciences, 45(5), 971–994.
  • Laczko, F., & Gramegna, M. A. (2003). Developing better indicators of human trafficking. Brown Journal World Affairs, 10, 179–194.
  • Landauer, T. K. (2002). On the computational basis of learning and cognition: Arguments from LSA. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 41, 43–84.
  • Lee, E. J. (2012). That's not the way it is: How user-generated comments on the news affect perceived media bias. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(1), 32–45.
  • Lee, E. J., & Jang, Y. J. (2010). What do others’ reactions to news on Internet portal sites tell us? Effects of presentation format and readers’ need for cognition on reality perception. Communication Research, 37, 825–846.
  • Liebes, T., & Katz, E. (1986). Patterns of involvement in television fiction: A comparative analysis. European Journal of Communication, 1(2), 151–171.
  • Limoncelli, S. (2010). The politics of trafficking: The first international movement to combat the sexual exploitation of women. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Lu, Y., Duan, H., Wang, H., & Zhai, C. (2010, August). Exploiting structured ontology to organize scattered online opinions. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on computational linguistics, Beijing, China (pp. 734–742). Beijing: Association for Computational Linguistics, Chinese Information Processing Society of China (CIPS).
  • Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008). Introduction to information retrieval 1: 6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Marchionni, D. M. (2012). International human trafficking: An agenda-building analysis of the US and British press. International Communication Gazette, 74(2), 145–158.
  • Mayes, I. (2004, July 10). A girdle round the earth. The Guardian. Retrieved December 2014, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1258030,00.html
  • McCarthy, L. A. (2014). Human trafficking and the new slavery. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 10(1), 221–242.
  • McCombs, M. (1997). New frontiers in agenda setting: Agendas of attributes and frames. Mass Communication Review, 24(1–2), 32–52.
  • McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (1972). The agenda-setting function of the mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187.
  • McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (1993). The evolution of agenda-setting research: Twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication, 43(2), 58–67.
  • Murray, A. (1998). Debt-bondage and trafficking: Don't believe the hype. In K. Kempadoo & J. Deozema (Eds.), Global sex workers: Rights resistance and redefinition (pp. 413–426). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review, 77(1), 175–190.
  • Pajnik, M. (2010). Media framing of trafficking. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 12(1), 45–64.
  • Ruiz, C., Domingo, D., Micó, J. L., Díaz-Noci, J., Masip, P., & Meso, K. (2011). Public sphere 2.0? The democratic qualities of citizen debates in online newspapers. International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(4), 463–487.
  • Salton, G. A. (1975). Vector space model for automatic indexing. Communications of the ACM, 18(11), 613–620.
  • Saussure, F. D. (1959). Course in general linguistics ( C. Bally & A. Sechehaye, Eds., W. Baskin, Trans.) New York, NY: Philosophical Library.
  • Steyvers, M., & Griffiths, T. (2007). Probabilistic topic models. Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis, 427(7), 424–440.
  • Surette, R. (1998). Media, crime, and criminal justice: Images and realities (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wadsworth.
  • Thurman, N. (2006, April). Participatory journalism in the mainstream: Attitudes and implementation at British news websites. Proceedings of 7th international symposium on online journalism, Austin, TX, USA.
  • Thurman, N. (2007). The globalization of journalism online: A transatlantic study of news websites and their international readers. Journalism, 8(3), 285–307.
  • Thurman, N. (2008). Forums for citizen journalists? Adoption of user-generated content initiatives by online news media. New Media and Society 10(1), 139–157.
  • Thurman, N., & Lupton, B. (2008). Convergence calls: Multimedia storytelling at British news websites. Convergence, 14(4), 439–455.
  • United Nations. (2000). United Nations protocol to prevent, suppress, and punish trafficking in persons, especially women and children, supplementing the United Nations convention against transnational organized crime, Article 3 (a–d), G.A. res. 55/25, annex II, 55 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 49) at 60, U.N. Doc. A/45/49 (Vol. I).
  • Van Aelst, P., & Walgrave, S. (2011). Minimal or massive? The political agenda–setting power of the mass media according to different methods. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 116(3), 295–313.
  • Van Dijck, J. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society, 31(1), 41–58.
  • Walkowitz, J. R. (1992). City of dreadful delight: Narratives of sexual danger in late Victorian London. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Wallinger, C. S. (2010). Media representation and human trafficking: How anti-trafficking discourse affects trafficked persons. Second annual interdisciplinary conference on human trafficking (p. 6). Lincoln: University of Nebraska.
  • Wanta, W., Golan, G., & Lee, C. (2004). Agenda setting and international news: Media influence on public perceptions of foreign nations. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(2), 364–377.
  • Wasileski, G., & Miller, M. J. (2012). Rethinking gender violence: Battered and trafficked women in Greece and the United States. In A. Brysk & A. Choi-Fitzpatrick (Eds.), From human trafficking to human rights: Reframing contemporary slavery (pp. 107–120). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Weitzer, R. (2007). The social construction of sex trafficking: Ideology and institutionalization of a moral crusade. Politics & Society, 35(3), 447–475.
  • Winson-Geideman, K., & Evangelopoulos, N. (2013). Research in real estate 1973–2010: A three-journal comparison. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 21(2), 255–267.
  • Wu, H. D., & Coleman, R. (2009). Advancing agenda-setting theory: The comparative strength and new contingent conditions of the two levels of agenda-setting effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(4), 775–789.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.