Bridging semantic and social network analyses: the case of the hashtag #precisamosfalarsobreaborto (we need to talk about abortion) on Twitter

References

• Aggio, C. (2015). Os candidatos ainda evitam a interação? Twitter, Comunicação Horizontal e Eleições Brasileiras [Candidates still avoid online interaction? An analysis of how and with whom 2010 Brazilian presidential candidates interacted on Twitter]. Ecompós, 18, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S., & Skoric, M. M. (2014, January). My name is Khan: The use of Twitter in the campaign for 2013 Pakistan General Election. Proceedings of the 47th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Washington, DC, pp. 2242–2251. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2014.282
   Google Scholar
• Aral, S., & Walker, D. (2012). Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks. Science, 337, 337–341. doi: 10.1126/science.1215842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakshy, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., & Adamic, L. (2012, April). The role of social networks in information diffusion. Proceedings of the 21st international conference on world wide web, Lyon, France, pp. 519–528. doi:10.1145/2187836.2187907
   Google Scholar
• Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Proceedings of the third international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media, San Jose, CA, USA, pp. 361–362. Retrieved from https://gephi.org/publications/gephi-bastian-feb09.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bode, L., Hanna, A., Yang, J., & Shah, D. V. (2015). Candidate networks, citizen clusters, and political expression strategic hashtag Use in the 2010 midterms. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 659(1), 149–165. doi: 10.1177/0002716214563923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, A., Burgess, J., Highfield, T., Kirchhoff, L., & Nicolai, T. (2011). Mapping The Australian networked public sphere. Social Science Computer Review, 29(3), 277–287. doi: 10.1177/0894439310382507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha, M., Benevenuto, F., Haddadi, H., & Gummadi, K. (2012, June). The world of connections and information flow in twitter. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans. IEEE Transactions on, 42(4), 991–998. doi:10.1109/TSMCA.2012.2183359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., & Gummadi, P. K. (2010). Measuring user influence in twitter: The million follower fallacy. Proceedings of the fourth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media, Menlo Park, CA, USA, pp. 10–17. Menlo Park, CA, USA. Retrieved from http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM10/paper/viewFile/1538/1826
   Google Scholar
• Chelmis, C., & Prasanna, V. K. (2011, October). Social networking analysis: A state of the art and the effect of semantics. Proceeding of the third international conference on social computing (SocialCom), MIT Media Lab Boston, MA, USA, pp. 531–536. doi:10.1109/PASSAT/SocialCom.2011.23
   Google Scholar
• Doerfel, M. L. (1998). What constitutes semantic network analysis? A comparison of research and methodologies. Connections, 21(2), 16–26.
   Google Scholar
• Donsbach, W., & Thomas, E. P. (2004). Political news journalists: Partisanship, professionalism, and political roles in five countries. In F. Esser & B. Pfetsch (Eds.), Comparing political communication: Theories, cases, and challenges (pp. 251–270). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dos Santos, M. A. (2014). A Rede de Oposição Radical no Facebook: cartografia e apontamentos sobre os haters políticos [The Radical opposition network on Facebook: Cartography and notes on political haters]. Revista de Estudos da Comunicação, 15(38), 309–324. doi: 10.7213/comunicacao.15.038.AO05
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, E., & Gaffney, D. (2014). The multiple facets of influence identifying political influentials and opinion leaders on twitter. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(10), 1260–1277. doi: 10.1177/0002764214527088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferree, M. M., Gamson, W. A., Gerhards, J., & Rucht, D. (2002). Shaping abortion discourse: Democracy and the public sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. doi: 10.1086/229213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel, S., Watts, D. J., & Goldstein, D. G. (2012, June). The structure of online diffusion networks. Proceedings of the 13th ACM conference on electronic commerce, Valencia, Spain, pp. 623–638. Retrieved from https://5harad.com/papers/diffusion.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Graham, T., Broersma, M., & Hazelhoff, K. (2013). Closing the gap? Twitter as an instrument for connected representation. In R. Scullion, R. Gerodimos, D. Jackson, & D. Lilleker (Eds.), The media, political participation and empowerment (pp. 71–88). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, T., Broersma, M., Hazelhoff, K., & van ‘t Haar, G. (2013). Between broadcasting political messages and interacting with voters: The use of Twitter during the 2010 UK general election campaign. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 692–716. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.785581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, T., Jackson, D., & Broersma, M. (2014). New platform, old habits? Candidates’ use of Twitter during the 2010 British and Dutch general election campaigns. New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444814546728
   Google Scholar
• Greer, C. F., & Ferguson, D. A. (2011). Using Twitter for promotion and branding: A content analysis of local television Twitter sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55(2), 198–214. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2011.570824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89. doi: 10.1080/19312450709336664
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, R., den Bulte, C. V., & Valente, T. W. (2011). Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Science, 30(2), 195–212. doi: 10.1287/mksc.1100.0566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955/2006). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. With a new introduction by Elihu Katz and a foreword by Elmo Roper (2nd ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• King, D., Ramirez-Cano, D., Greaves, F., Vlaev, I., Beales, S., & Darzi, A. (2013). Twitter and the health reforms in the English national health service. Health Policy, 110(2), 291–297. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinberg, J. M. (1999). Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM, 46(5), 604–632. doi: 10.1145/324133.324140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasorsa, D. L., Lewis, S. C., & Holton, A. E. (2012). Normalizing Twitter: Journalism practice in an emerging communication space. Journalism Studies, 13(1), 19–36. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2011.571825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leavitt, A., Burchard, E., Fisher, D., & Gilbert, S. (2009). The influentials: New approaches for analyzing influence on twitter. Web Ecology Project, 4(2), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Lerman, K., & Ghosh, R. (2010). Information contagion: An empirical study of the spread of news on Digg and Twitter social networks. Proceedings of the fourth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 90–97. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2664
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. C., Zamith, R., & Hermida, A. (2013). Content analysis in an era of big data: A hybrid approach to computational and manual methods. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(1), 34–52. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2012.761702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lycarião, D., & Maia, R. C. M. (2015). A COP-15 sob holofotes mediáticos: modos e níveis de intervenção política do jornalismo no sistema de mídia brasileiro [COP-15 under media spotlight: Different modes and levels of journalistic political intervention along the Brazilian media system]. Ecompós, 18(1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Neundorf, K. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2014). Religion in Latin America: Widespread change in a historically catholic region. Retrieved June 20, 2015, from http://www.pewforum.org/files/2014/11/Religion-in-Latin-America-11-12-PM-full-PDF.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Qin, J. (2015). Hero on Twitter, traitor on news How social media and legacy news frame Snowden. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 20(2), 166–184. doi: 10.1177/1940161214566709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razis, G., & Anagnostopoulos, I. (2014). Semantifying Twitter: The influence tracker ontology. 9th International Workshop on Semantic and Social Media Adaptation and Personalization (SMAP 2014), Corfu, Greece, pp. 98–103.
   Google Scholar
• Recuero, R. (2013). Contribuições da Análise de Redes Sociais para o estudo das redes sociais na Internet: o caso da hashtag# Tamojuntodilma e# CalaabocaDilma [Contributions of Social Network Analysis for the study of online social networks: A case study of #Tamojuntodilmaand #CalaabocaDilma hashtags]. Fronteiras-estudos midiáticos, 16(2), 60–77.
   Google Scholar
• Recuero, R., Zago, G., & Bastos, M. T. (2014). O Discurso dos# ProtestosBR: análise de conteúdo do Twitter [The discourse of #ProtestosBR: Content analysis of Twitter]. Galáxia, 14(28), 199–216.
   Google Scholar
• Romero, D. M., Galuba, W., Asur, S., & Huberman, B. A. (2011). Influence and passivity in social media. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, Hyderabad, India, pp. 113–114. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.1253
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M. G., Flora, J., Strohmaier, M., Pöschko, J., Perez, R., & Rubens, N. (2011). Semantic analysis of energy-related conversations in social media: A Twitter case study. Proceedings of the international conference of persuasive technology, Columbus, OH, USA. Retrieved from http://www.markusstrohmaier.info/documents/2011_Persuasive_Semantic_Analysis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Said-Hung, E., & Arcila-Calderón, C. (2011). Los líderes de opinión en Colombia, Venezuela e Irán. El caso de los 20 usuarios más vistos en Twitter. Comunicación y Sociedad, 24(1), 75–100.
   Google Scholar
• Small, T. A. (2011). What the hashtag? A content analysis of Canadian politics on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 14(6), 872–895. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.554572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. A., Shneiderman, B., Milic-Frayling, N., Mendes Rodrigues, E., Barash, V., Dunne, C., & Gleave, E. (2009, June). Analyzing (social media) networks with NodeXL. Proceedings of the fourth international conference on communities and technologies, University Park, PA, USA, pp. 255–264. University Park, PA, USA. Retrieved from http://perer.org/papers/adamPerer-NodeXL-CT2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P., & Chi, E. H. (2010, August). Want to be retweeted? Large scale analytics on factors impacting retweet in twitter network. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on social computing, Minneapolis, MN, USA, pp. 177–184. Retrieved from http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~echi/papers/2010-socialcom/2010-06-25-retweetability-cameraready-v3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Waters, R. D., & Jamal, J. Y. (2011). Tweet, tweet, tweet: A content analysis of nonprofit organizations’ Twitter updates. Public Relations Review, 37(3), 321–324. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessler, H., Wozniak, A., & Luck, J. (2013). Sustainable media events? Production and discursive effects of staged global political media events in the area of climate change [Codebook]. Retrieved February 14, 2014, from http://climate.uni-mannheim.de/Downloads/Codebook%20for%20media%20content%20analysis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Xu, W. W., Sang, Y., Blasiola, S., & Park, H. W. (2014). Predicting opinion leaders in twitter activism networks the case of the Wisconsin recall election. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(10), 1278–1293. doi: 10.1177/0002764214527091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, S. S., & Wu, F. (2013). Measuring message propagation and social influence on Twitter.com. International Journal of Communication Networks and Distributed Systems, 1, 59–76. doi: 10.1504/IJCNDS.2013.054835
   Google Scholar