Learning in a Twitter-based community of practice: an exploration of knowledge exchange as a motivation for participation in #hcsmca

References

• Arazy, O., Gellatly, I., Brainin, E., & Nov, O. (2015). Motivation to share knowledge using wiki technology and the moderating effect of role perceptions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 1–17. doi:10.1002/asi.23579
   Google Scholar
• Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 64–77. doi:10.1108/13673270310463626
   Google Scholar
• Brabham, D. C. (2012). Motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application to improve public engagement in transit planning. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 40(3), 307–328. doi:10.1080/00909882.2012.69394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budhathoki, N. R., & Haythornthwaite, C. (2012). Motivation for open collaboration crowd and community models and the case of OpenStreetMap. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(5), 548–575. doi:10.1177/0002764212469364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, December 2014. Retrieved from http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2-2014/TCPS_2_FINAL_Web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, C. M. K., Lee, M. K. O., & Lee, Z. W. Y. (2013). Understanding the continuance intention of knowledge sharing in online communities of practice through the post-knowledge sharing evaluation process. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 67(7), 1357–1374. doi:10.1002/asi.22854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Downes, S. (2007). Learning networks in practice. In D. Ley (Ed.), Emerging technologies for learning (Vol. 2, pp. 19–27). London: British Educational Communications and Technology Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Ebner, M., Lienhardt, C., Rohs, M., & Meyer, I. (2010, August). Microblogs in higher education a chance to facilitate informal and process-oriented learning? Computers & Education, 55(1), 92–100. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveleigh, A., Jennett, C., Blandford, A., Brohan, P., & Cox, A. L. (2014). Designing for dabblers and deterring drop-outs in citizen science. Paper presented at the proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 2985–2994. doi:10.1145/2556288.2557262
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, S. (2015, February 2). Why do you take part in #hcsmca? Introducing a study examining motivations for participation in online groups [Weblog post]. Retrieved from https://cyhealthcommunications.wordpress.com/2015/02/02/why-do-you-take-part-in-hcsmca-introducing-a-study-examining-motivations-for-participating-in-online-groups/
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, S., & Paulin, P. (2015). Tweet to learn: Expertise and centrality in conference Twitter networks. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii international conference on system science, 1920–1929. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2015.231
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2776392 doi: 10.1086/225469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruzd, A., & Haythornthwaite, C. (2013). Enabling community through social media. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(10), e248. doi:10.2196/jmir.2796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruzd, A., Haythornthwaite, C., Paulin, D., Gilbert, S., & Esteve de Valle, M. (in review). New media and society.
   Google Scholar
• Gruzd, A., Wellman, B., & Takhteyev, Y. (2011). Imagining Twitter as an imagined community. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(10), 1294–1318. doi:10.1177/0002764211409378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, H., & Graham, D. (2004). Creation and recreation: Motivating collaboration to generate knowledge capital in online communities. International Journal of Information Management, 24, 235–246. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2004.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hara, N., & Hew, K. F. (2007). Knowledge-sharing in an online community of health-care professionals. Information, Technology & People, 20(3), 235–261. doi:10.1108/09593840710822859
   Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C. (2009). Crowds and communities: Light and heavyweight models of peer production. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii international conference on system science, 1–10. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2009.137
   Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C., & De Laat, M. (2010). Social networks and learning networks: Using social network perspectives to understand social learning. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 7th international conference on networked learning 2010, 83–190.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S. C. (2002). Computer-mediated communication on the internet. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36(1), 109–168. doi: 10.1002/aris.1440360104
   Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F., & Hara, N. (2007). Knowledge sharing in online environments: A qualitative case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(14), 2310–2324. doi:10.1002/asi.20698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, S., Lai, H., & Chou, Y. (2015). Knowledge-sharing intention in professional virtual communities: A comparison between posters and lurkers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(12), 2494–2510. doi:a0s.i1.2030323/a9si.23339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119–132. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2747854 doi: 10.1086/268109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, N., Schulze, T., & Veit, D. (2011). More fun than money. Worker motivation in crowdsourcing – A study on Mechanical Turk. Paper presented at the proceedings of the seventeenth Americas conference on information systems, 1–11. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2011_submissions/340/
   Google Scholar
• Koh, J., Kim, Y., Butler, B., & Bock, G. (2007). Encouraging participation in virtual communities. Communications of the ACM, 50(2), 69–73. doi:10.1145/1216016.1216023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampe, C., Wash, R., Velasquez, A., & Ozkaya, E. (2010). Motivations to participate in online communities. Paper presented at the proceedings of 28th international conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI 2010, 1927–1936. doi:10.1145/1753326.1753616
   Google Scholar
• Maloney, S. (2015, November 11). Patients, providers and the future of health care [Weblog post]. Retrieved from https://cyhealthcommunications.wordpress.com/2015/11/11/join-hcsmca-tweet chat-on-patients-providers-and-the-future-of-health-care/
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, S. E. (2015, November 8). Social Media isn’t Accessible for Everyone – #hcsmca Explores [Weblog post]. Retrieved from https://cyhealthcommunications.wordpress.com/2015/11/08/social-media-isnt-accessible-for-everyone-hcsmca-explores/
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. (2013). The design of everyday things (revised and expanded ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Panciera, K., Masli, M., & Terveen, L. (2011). “How should I go from _ to _ without getting killed?: Motivation and benefits in open collaboration. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 7th international symposium on Wikis and open collaboration, 183–192.
   Google Scholar
• Paulin, D., & Gilbert, S. (2016). Social media and learning. In C. Haythornthwaite, R. Andrews, J. Fransman, & E. Meyers (Eds.), SAGE handbook of E-learning research (2nd ed.) (pp.354–374). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Quan-Haase, A., Martin, K., & McCay-Peet, L. (2015). Networks of digital humanities scholars: The information and social uses and gratifications of Twitter. Big Data & Society, 2(1), 1–12. doi:10.1177/2053951715589417
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, G., & Cox, A. M. (2016). A practice-based approach to understanding participation in online communities. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 21, 17–31. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2005). Knowledge building. In K.R. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of learning sciences (pp. 97–115). West Nyack, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/journal/jan_05/article01.htm
   Google Scholar
• Sharratt, M., & Usoro, A. (2003). Understanding knowledge-sharing in online communities of practice. Electronic Journal on Knowledge Management, 1(2), 187–196. Retrieved from: http://www.ejkm.com/issue/download.html?idArticle=32
   Google Scholar
• Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. (1978). A social world perspective. Studies in Symbolic Interactions, 1, 119–128.
   Google Scholar
• Tedjamulia, S. J. J., Dean, D. L., Olsen, D. R., & Albrecht, C. C. (2005). Motivating content contributions to online communities: Toward a more comprehensive theory. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii international conference on system science, 1–10. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2005.444
   Google Scholar
• Tozer, K. (2015, November 18). What is ‘Arts and Health?’ [Weblog post]. Retrieved from https://cyhealthcommunications.wordpress.com/2015/11/18/what-is-arts-health/
   Google Scholar
• Usoro, A., Sharratt, M., Tsui, E., & Shekhar, S. (2007). Trust as an antecedent to knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 5, 199–212. doi:10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500143
   Google Scholar
• Vassileva, J. (2012). Motivating participation in social computing applications: A user modeling perspective. User Modeling and User-Adapted, 22(1), 177–201. doi:10.1007/s11257-011-9109-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2003). Assessing motivation of contribution in online communities: An empirical investigation of an online travel community. Electronic Markets, 13(1), 33–45. doi: 10.1080/1019678032000052934
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction. Communication Research, 19(1), 52–90. doi:10.1177/009365092019001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, C. A. B. (2001). Qualitative interviewing. In J. F. Gubrium, & J.A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research (pp. 83–103). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (2006). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. Retrieved from http://wenger-trayner.com/theory/
   Google Scholar
• Xu, W. W., Chiu, I., Chen, Y., & Mukherjee, T. (2015). Twitter hashtags for health: Applying network and content analyses to understand the health knowledge sharing in a Twitter-based community of practice. Quality & Quantity, 49(4), 1361–1380. doi:10.1007/s11135-014-0051-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar