Communication of communities: linguistic signals of online groups

References

• Arguello, J., Butler, B. S., Joyce, E., Kraut, R., Ling, K. S., & Wang, X. (2006, April 22–28). Talk to me: Foundation for successful individual-group interaction in online communities. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Montreal, QC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Baym, N. K., & Ledbetter, A. (2009). Tunes that bind?: Predicting friendship strength in a music-based social network. Information, Communication, & Society, 12, 408–427. doi: 10.1080/13691180802635430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, M. S., Monroy-Hernandez, A., Harry, D., Andre, P., Panovich, K., & Vargas, G. (2011, July 17–21). 4chan and /b/: An analysis of anonymity and ephemerality in a large online community. Proceedings of the fifth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media, Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn, K., Brody, N., & LeFebvre, L. (2014). The I’s, we’s, and she/he’s of breakups: Public and private pronoun usage in relationship dissolution accounts. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 202–213. doi: 10.1177/0261927X13516865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard, A. (2004). Virtual behavior settings: An application of behavior setting theories to virtual communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00285.x
   Google Scholar
• Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d. (2011). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), Networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Canary, D. J., Stafford, L., Hause, K. S., & Wallace, L. S. (1993). An inductive analysis of relational maintenance strategies: Comparison among lovers, relatives, friends, and others. Communication Research Reports, 10, 3–14. doi: 10.1080/08824099309359913
   Google Scholar
• Casey-Campbell, M., & Martens, M. L. (2009). Sticking it all together: A critical assessment of the group cohesion-performance literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11, 223–246. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00239.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2001). The internet galaxy: Reflections on the internet, business, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chmiel, A., Sienkiewicz, J., Thelwall, M., Paltoglou, G., Buckley, K., Kappas, A., & Holyst, J. A. (2011). Collective emotions online and their influence on community life. PlosOne. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022207
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37, 39–67. doi: 10.1177/0149206310388419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulson, N. S., Buchanan, H., & Aubeeluck, A. (2007). Social support in cyberspace: A content analysis of communication within a Huntington’s disease online support group. Patient Education and Counseling, 68, 173–178. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2007.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donath, J. S. (1999). Identity and deception in the virtual community. In P. Kollock & M. Smith (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 29–59). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Donath, J. S. (2007). Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 231–251. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00394.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, J. E. I. (2014). Reddit comment scraper. Retrieved from https://github.com/jfarmer/reddit_comment_scraper/commits?author=jfarmer
   Google Scholar
• Fayard, A.-L., & DeSanctis, G. (2010). Enacting language games: The development of a sense of ‘we-ness’ in online forums. Information Systems Journal, 20, 383–416. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00335.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271–282. doi:10.1037/h0056932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, K., & Morman, M. T. (1997). Affectionate communication in nonromantic relationships: Influences of communicator, relational, and contextual factors. Western Journal of Communication, 61, 279–298. doi: 10.1080/10570319709374578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedkin, N. E. (2004). Social cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 409–425. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D. (2002). Customer loyalty in e-commerce. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 27–51. Retrieved from http://jais.aisnet.org/contents.asp
   Google Scholar
• Goode, J., & Robinson, J. D. (2013). Linguistic synchrony in parasocial interaction. Communication Studies, 64, 453–466. doi:10.1080/10510974.2013.773923
   Google Scholar
• Gruzd, A., & Haythornthwaite, C. (2013). Enabling community through social media. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15, e248. doi:10.2196/jmir.2796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero, L. K., & Anderson, P. A. (2000). Emotion in close relationships. In C. Hendrick & S. S. Hendrick (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 171–182). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Guillory, J., Spiegel, J., Drislane, M., Weiss, B., Donner, W., & Hancock, J. (2011). Upset now? Emotional contagion in distributed groups. Paper presented at a meeting of CHI 2011, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, S., & Gilding, M. (2004). ‘I’ve never clicked this much with anyone in my life’: Trust and hyperpersonal communication in online friendships. New Media and Society, 6, 487–506. doi:10.1177/146144804044331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597–606. doi: 10.1086/222355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, E., & Kraut, R. E. (2006). Predicting continued participation in newsgroups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 723–747. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00033.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp, M. L., Vangelisti, A., & Caughlin, J. P. (2014). Interpersonal communication and human relationships. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Lampe, C., Ellison, N., & Steinfield, C. (2007). A familiar Face(book): Profile elements as signals in an online social network. CHI 2007 proceedings, San Jose, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Li, H. (2004). Virtual community studies: A literature review, synthesis, and research agenda. Proceedings of the America conference on information systems, New York.
   Google Scholar
• McEwan, B. (2015). Navigating new media networks: Understanding and managing challenges in a networked society. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• McEwan, B., & Zanolla, D. (2013). When online meets offline: A field investigation of modality switching. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1565–1571. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the internet: What’s the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9–31. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikal, J. P., Rice, R. E., Abeyta, A., & DeVilbiss, J. (2013). Transition, stress, and computer-mediated social support. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, A40–A53. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1996.tb00176.x
   Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J. W., Chung, C. K., Ireland, M., Gonzales, A., & Booth, R. J. (2007). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007. Retrieved from http://www.homepage.psy.utexas.edu/homepage/Class/Psy301/Pennebaker/HRtraining/LIWC2007_LanguageManual.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Porter, C. E. (2004). A typology of virtual communities: A multi-disciplinary foundation for future research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00228.x
   Google Scholar
• Preece, J. (2001). Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success. Behavior and Information Technology Journal, 20, 347–356. doi:10.1080/01449290110084683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rheingold, H. (1998). Virtual communities. In F. Hesselbein, M. Goldsmith, R. Beckhard, & R. F. Schubert (Eds.), The community of the future (pp. 115–124). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Rheingold, H. (2001). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier (2nd ed.). Boston: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ridings, C., Gefen, D., & Arinze, B. (2002). Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11, 271–295. doi:10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00021-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridings, C. M., & Gefen, D. (2004). Virtual community attraction: Why people hang out online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00229.x
   Google Scholar
• Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 355–374. doi: 10.2307/1882010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 24–54. doi: 10.1177/0261927X09351676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibault, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2008). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the internet: Consequences for social competence and self-concept unity. Communication Research, 35, 208–231. doi:10.1177/0093650707313164
   Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P. M., Schouten, A. P., & Peter, J. (2005). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the internet. New Media and Society, 7, 383–402. doi:10.1177/1461444805052282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 436–455. doi:10.1177/00027640121957286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, K., Hamman, B., & Thorson, K. (2006). Moderation, response rate, and message interactivity: Features of online communities and their effects on intent to participate. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 24–41. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00313.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, K. (2000). Perceptions of on-line support providers: An examination of perceived homophily, source credibility, communication, and social support within on-line social groups. Communication Quarterly, 48, 44–59. doi:10.1090/01463370009385579
   Google Scholar
• Wright, K., Rains, S., & Banas, J. (2010). Weak-tie support network preference and perceived life stress among participants in health-related, computer-mediated support groups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, 606–624. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01505.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahavi, A. (1977). The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle). Journal of Theoretical Biology, 67, 603–605. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(77)90061-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar