Stuck with ‘electronic brochures’? How boundary management strategies shape politicians’ social media use

References

• Bandura, A. (1977). A social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bichard, S. L. (2006). Building blogs: A multi-dimensional analysis of the distribution of frames on the 2004 presidential candidate websites. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(2), 329–345. doi: 10.1177/107769900608300207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumler, J. G., & Kavanagh, D. (1999). The third age of political communication: Influences and features. Political Communication, 16(3), 209–230. doi: 10.1080/105846099198596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bor, S. E. (2013). Using social networking sites to improve communication between political campaigns and citizens in the 2012 election. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(9), 1195–1213. doi: 10.1177/0002764213490698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulianne, S. (2009). Does Internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26(2), 193–211. doi: 10.1080/10584600902854363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• boyd, d. (2006). Friends, friendsters, and top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites. First Monday, 11(12).
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d., & Ellison, N. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(12), 210–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Alessio, D. (2000). Adoption of the world wide web by American political candidates, 1996–1998. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(4), 556–568. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4404_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. L., & Jurgenson, N. (2014). Context collapse: Theorizing context collusions and collisions. Information, Communication & Society, 17(4), 476–485. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.888458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donath, J., & boyd, d. (2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71–82. doi: 10.1023/B:BTTJ.0000047585.06264.cc
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N., Hancock, J., & Toma, C. (2011). Profile as a promise: A framework for conceptualizing veracity in online dating self-presentation. New Media & Society, 14(1), 45–62. doi: 10.1177/1461444811410395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 415–441. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00020.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook ‘friends’: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enli, G. S., & Skogerbø, E. (2013). Personalized campaigns in party-centered politics. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 757–774. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fieseler, C., Meckel, M., & Ranzini, G. (2015). Professional personae – how organizational identification shapes online identity in the workplace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(2), 153–170. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foot, K., Schneider, S., Xenos, M., & Dougherty, M. (2009). Candidates’ Web practices in the 2002 U.S. House, Senate, and Gubernatorial Elections. Journal of Political Marketing, 8(2), 147–167. doi: 10.1080/15377850902813519
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. K., & McAllister, I. (2011). Do online election campaigns win votes? The 2007 Australian ‘YouTube’ elections. Political Communication, 28(2), 227–244. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2011.568042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. K., Römmele, A., & Williamson, A. (2014). Chasing the digital wave: International perspectives on the growth of online campaigning. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(2), 123–129. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2014.903064
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R., Williamson, A., & Ward, S. (2010). The Internet and the 2010 Election: Putting the small ‘p’ back in politics. London: Hansard Society.
   Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Puig-I-Abril, E., & Rojas, H. (2009). Weblogs, traditional sources online and political participation: An assessment of how the internet is changing the political environment. New Media & Society, 11(4), 553–574. doi: 10.1177/1461444809102960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Veenstra, A., Vraga, E., & Shah, D. (2010). Digital democracy: Reimagining pathways to political participation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7(1), 36–51. doi: 10.1080/19331680903316742
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry. Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 18, 213–231. doi: 10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Anchor Books Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, T., Broersma, M., Hazelhoff, K., & van’t Haar, G. (2013). Between broadcasting political messages and interacting with voters. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 692–716. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.785581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulati, G. J. (2004). Members of Congress and presentation of self on the world wide web. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 9(1), 22–40. doi: 10.1177/1081180X03259758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulati, J., & Williams, C. (2010). Communicating with constituents in 140 characters or less: Twitter and the diffusion of technology innovation in the United States Congress. Paper presented at the 2010 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, K. M., & Kosiara-Pedersen, K. (2014). Cyber-campaigning in Denmark: Application and effects of candidate campaigning. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(2), 206–219. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2014.895476
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, N., & Lilleker, D. (2009). Building an architecture of participation? Political parties and Web 2.0 in Britain. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 6(3/4), 232–250. doi: 10.1080/19331680903028438
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, N., & Lilleker, D. (2011). Microblogging, constituency service and impression management: UK MPs and the use of Twitter. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(1), 86–105. doi: 10.1080/13572334.2011.545181
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, S. E., & Wilkerson, K. (2005). Congress on the Internet: Messages on the homepages of the U.S. House of Representatives, 1996 and 2001. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(2), doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00246.x
   Google Scholar
• Kalnes, O. (2009). Norwegian parties and Web 2.0. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 6(3/4), 251–266. doi: 10.1080/19331680903041845
   Google Scholar
• Kane, G. C., Alavi, M., Labianca, G., & Borgatti, S. P. (2014). What’s different about social media networks? A framework and research agenda. MIS Quarterly, 38(1), 274–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koc-Michalska, K., Gibson, R., & Vedel, T. (2014). Online campaigning in France, 2007–2012: Political actors and citizens in the aftermath of the Web 2.0 evolution. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(2), 220–244. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2014.903217
   Google Scholar
• Kruikemeier, S. (2014). How political candidates use Twitter and the impact on votes. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 131–139. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwang, T., & Swann, W. B. (2010). Do people embrace praise even when they feel unworthy? A review of critical tests of self-enhancement versus self-verification. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 263–280. doi: 10.1177/1088868310365876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, E., Sides, J., & Farrell, H. (2010). Self-segregation or deliberation? Blog readership, participation, and polarization in American politics. Perspectives on Politics, 8(1), 141–157. doi: 10.1017/S1537592709992714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. J., & Shin, S.Y. (2012). Are they talking to me? Cognitive and affective effects of interactivity in politicians’ Twitter communication. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(10), 515–520. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilleker, D. G., & Koc-Michalska, K. (2013). Online political communication strategies: MEPs, e-representation, and self-representation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 10(2), 190–207. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2012.758071
   Google Scholar
• Macnamara, J., & Kenning, G. (2011). E-electioneering 2010: Trends in social media use in Australian political communication. Media International Australia, 139(1), 7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Marcinkowski, F., & Metag, J. (2014). Why do candidates use online media in constituency campaigning? An application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(2), 151–168. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2014.895690
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E., & boyd, d. (2010). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. doi: 10.1177/1461444810365313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E., & boyd, d. (2014). Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society, 16(7), 1051–1067. doi: 10.1177/1461444814543995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, C., & Vitak, J. (2011). Norm evolution and violation on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14(2), 299–315. doi: 10.1177/1461444811412712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mughan, A. (2000). Media and the presidentialization of parliamentary elections. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Nadkarni, A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2012). Why do people use Facebook? Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 243–249. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosko, A., Wood, E., & Molema, S. (2010). All about me: Disclosure in online social network profiles: The case of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 406–418. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ollier-Malaterre, A., Rothbard, N. P., & Berg, J. (2013). When worlds collide in cyberspace: How boundary work in online social networks impacts professional relationships. Academy of Management Review, 38(4), 645–669. doi: 10.5465/amr.2011.0235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C. S. (2013). Does Twitter motivate involvement in politics? Tweeting, opinion leadership, and political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1641–1648. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, P., Giacalone, R., & Riordan, C. (2001). Impression management: Building and enhancing reputations at work. New York, NY: International Thompson Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenstiel, T., & Mitchell, A. (2012). How the presidential candidates use the web and social media. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center Project for Excellence in Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Rothbard, N. P., & Ramarajan, L. (2009). Checking your identities at the door: Positive relationships between nonwork and work identities. In L. M. Roberts & J. E. Dutton (Eds.), Exploring positive identities and organizations: Building a theoretical and research foundation (pp. 125–148). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schütz, A. (1995). Entertainers, experts, or public servants? Politicians’ self-presentation on television talk shows. Political Communication, 12(2), 211–221. doi: 10.1080/10584609.1995.9963066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidman, G. (2013). Self-presentation and belonging on Facebook: How personality influences social media use and motivations. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(3), 402–407. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanyer, J. (2008). Elected representatives, online self-presentation and the personal vote: Party, personality and webstyles in the United States and United Kingdom. Information, Communication & Society, 11(3), 414–432. doi:10.1080/13691180802025681
   Google Scholar
• Strano, M. (2008). User descriptions and interpretations of self-presentation through Facebook profile images. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 2(2). Retrieved from http://cyberpsychology.eu/view.php?cisloclanku=2008110402&article=1
   Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J. (2000a). On-line interaction and why candidates avoid it. Journal of Communication, 50(4), 111–132. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02865.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J. (2000b). Democratising democracy: Strong democracy, US political campaigns and the internet. Democratization, 7(1), 36–58. doi: 10.1080/13510340008403644
   Google Scholar
• Stutzman, F., Capra, R., & Thompson, J. (2011). Factors mediating disclosure in social network sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 590–598. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stutzman, F., & Hartzog, W. (2012). Boundary regulation in social media. Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, WA, 769–778.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., Kalyanaraman, S., & Brown, J. (2003). Explicating Web site interactivity: Impression formation effects in political campaign sites. Communication Research, 30(1), 30–59. doi: 10.1177/0093650202239025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towner, T. L., & Dulio, D. A. (2011a). The Web 2.0 election: Does the online medium matter? Journal of Political Marketing, 10(1–2), 165–188. doi: 10.1080/15377857.2011.540220
   Google Scholar
• Towner, T. L., & Dulio, D. A. (2011b). An experiment of campaign effects during the YouTube election. New Media & Society, 13(4), 626–644. doi: 10.1177/1461444810377917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utz, S. (2009). The (potential) benefits of campaigning via social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 221–243. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01438.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergeer, M. (2013). Politics, elections and online campaigning: Past, present  …  and a peek into the future. New Media & Society, 15(1), 9–17. doi: 10.1177/1461444812457327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitak, J. (2012). The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network site disclosure. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 451–470. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2012.732140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, S., & Gibson, R. (2003). Online and on message? Candidate websites in the 2001 general election campaign. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 5(2), 188–205. doi: 10.1111/1467-856X.00103
   Google Scholar
• Ward, S., Gibson, R., & Nixon, P. (2003). Parties and the Internet: An overview. In P. N. R. Gibson (Eds.), Political parties and the Internet: Net gain? (pp. 11–38). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wattal, S., Schuff, D., Mandviwalla, M., & Williams, C. (2010). Web 2.0 and politics: The 2008 U.S. presidential election and an e-politics research agenda. MIS Quarterly, 34(4), 669–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C. B., Aylesworth, A., & Chapman, K. (2002). The 2000 e-campaign for U.S. Senate. Journal of Political Marketing, 1(4), 39–63. doi: 10.1300/J199v01n04_03
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. B., & Gulati, G. J. (2012). Social networks in political campaigns: Facebook and the congressional elections of 2006 and 2008. New Media & Society, 15(1), 52–71. doi: 10.1177/1461444812457332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S., & Martin, J. (2008). Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1816–1836. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zittel, T. (2009). Lost in technology? Political parties and the online campaigns of constituency candidates in Germany’s mixed member electoral system. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 6(3/4), 298–311. doi: 10.1080/19331680903048832
   Google Scholar