Closing the gap: gender parity in political engagement on social media

References

• Abraham, L. B., Morn, M. P., & Vollman, A. (2010). Women on the web: How women are shaping the Internet. ComScore. Retrieved from http://www.digitalads.org/general%20marketing/comScore_onlinewomen_092010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht, S. (2006). Whose voice is heard in online deliberation?: A study of participation and representation in political debates on the Internet. Information, Communication, & Society, 9(1), 62–82. doi: 10.1080/13691180500519548
   Google Scholar
• Babcock, L., Laschever, S., Gelfand, M., & Small, D. (2003, October). Nice girls don’t ask: Women negotiate less than men – and everyone pays the price. Harvard Business Review, October, 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, L. L. M., & Bennett, S. E. (1989). Enduring gender differences in political interest: The impact of socialization and political dispositions. American Politics Research, 17(1), 105–122. doi: 10.1177/1532673X8901700106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication, & Society, 15(5), 739–768. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bimber, B. (2000). Measuring the gender gap on the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, 81(3), 868–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, L. (2016). Political news in the news feed: Learning politics from social media. Mass Communication & Society, 19(1), 24–48. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2015.1045149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, L., Vraga, E. K., Borah, P., & Shah, D. V. (2014). A new space for political behavior: Political social networking and its democratic consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 414–429. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulianne, S. (2009). Does Internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26(2), 193–211. doi: 10.1080/10584600902854363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication, & Society, 18(5), 524–538. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. J. (2010). A negativity gap? Voter gender, attack politics, and participation in ‘American elections. Politics & Gender, 6(3), 319–341. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X10000218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calenda, D., & Meijer, A. (2009). Young people, the Internet, and political participation. Information, Communication, & Society, 12(6), 879–898. doi: 10.1080/13691180802158508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffe, H., & Bolzendahl, C. (2010). Same game, different rules? Gender differences in political participation. Sex Roles, 62(5–6), 318–333. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9729-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colley, A., & Maltby, J. (2008). Impact of the Internet on our lives: Male and female personal perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2005–2013. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, M. M. (2001). Women and political participation. Political Science and Politics, 34(2), 231–233. doi: 10.1017/S1049096501000385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costantini, E. (1990). Political women and political ambition: Closing the gender gap. American Journal of Political Science, 34(3), 741–770. doi: 10.2307/2111397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, M., & Keeter, S. (2005). Gender and political knowledge. In Sue Tolleson-Rinehart, & Jyl J. Josephson (Eds.), Gender and American politics: Women, men, and the political process. 21–47. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, K. (2011). Do women and men know different things? Measuring gender differences in political knowledge. Journal of Politics, 73(1), 97–107. doi: 10.1017/S0022381610000897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dow, J. K. (2009). Gender differences in political knowledge: Distinguishing characteristics-based and returns-based differences. Political Behavior, 31(1), 117–136. doi: 10.1007/s11109-008-9059-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drabowicz, T. (2014). Gender and digital usage inequality among adolescents: A comparative study of 39 Countries. Computers and Education, 74(May), 98–111. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13(6), 873–892. doi: 10.1177/1461444810385389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallows, D. (2005). How men and women use the Internet. Pew Internet & American Life. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2005/12/28/how-women-and-men-use-the-internet/
   Google Scholar
• Fox, R. L., & Lawless, J. L. (2004). Entering the arena? Gender and the decision to run for office. American Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 264–280. doi: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00069.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridkin, K. L., & Kenney, P. J. (2014). How the gender of U.S. Senators influences people’s understanding and engagement in politics. Journal of Politics, 76(4), 1017–1031. doi: 10.1017/S0022381614000589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedland, L. A., Rojas, H., & Bode, L. (2012). Consuming ourselves to dearth: Escalating inequality and public opinion. ANNALS of Political and Social Science, 644, 280–293. doi: 10.1177/0002716212455383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., & Thelen, M. H. (1988). Children’s expected interpersonal consequences of communicating their affective state and reported likelihood of expression. Child Development, 59, 1314–1322. doi: 10.2307/1130494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulton, S. A., Maestas, C. D., Maisel, S. L., & Stone, W. J. (2006). The sense of a woman: Gender, ambition, and the decision to run for Congress. Political Research Quarterly, 59(2), 235–248. doi: 10.1177/106591290605900206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galston, W. A. (2001). Political knowledge, political engagement, and civic education. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 217–234. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, P. W., & Power, T. G. (1996). Preschoolers’ emotional control in the disappointment paradigm and its relation to temperament, emotional knowledge, and family expressiveness. Child Development, 67, 1406–1419. doi: 10.2307/1131708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, R., & Cantijoch, M. (2013). Conceptualizing and measuring participation in the age of the Internet: Is online political engagement really different to offline? Journal of Politics, 75(3), 701–716. doi: 10.1017/S0022381613000431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Veenstra, A., Vraga, E., & Shah, D. (2014). Digital democracy: Reimagining pathways to political participation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7(1), 36–51. doi: 10.1080/19331680903316742
   Google Scholar
• Gladue, B. A. (1991). Aggressive behavioral characteristics, hormones, and sexual orientation in men and women. Aggressive Behavior, 17(6), 313–326. doi: 10.1002/1098-2337(1991)17:6<313::AID-AB2480170603>3.0.CO;2-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenstein, F. I. (1965). Children and politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. B. (1997). Talking about politics: Gender and contextual effects on political proselytizing. Journal of Politics, 59(1), 73–103. doi: 10.2307/2998216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., & Shafer, S. (2006). Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gender. Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 432–448. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00389.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., & Shaw, D. (2015). Mind the skills gap: The role of Internet know-how and gender in differentiated contributions to Wikipedia. Information, Communication, & Society, 18(4), 424–442. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.957711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., & Walejko, G. (2008). The participation divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information, Communication, and Society, 11(2), 239–256. doi: 10.1080/13691180801946150
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, L., & Munn, J. (2007). Gendered (Non)participants? What constructions of citizenship tell us about democratic governance in the twenty-first century. Parliamentary Affairs, 60(3), 426–436. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsm016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausmann, R., Tyson, L. D., & Zahidi, S. (2008). The global gender gap report 2008. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GenderGap_Report_2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, B. C., & Bean, C. S. (1993). Gender and local political interest: Some international comparisons. Political Studies, 41(4), 672–682. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1993.tb01665.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helsper, E. J. (2010). Gendered Internet use across generations and life stages. Communication Research, 37(3), 352–374. doi: 10.1177/0093650209356439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, R. D., & Torney, J. V. (1967). The development of political attitudes in children. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, C. P., Lutz, C., & Meckel, M. (2015). Content creation on the Internet: A social cognitive perspective on the participation divide. Information, Communication, & Society, 18(6), 696–716. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.991343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M., & Stolle, D. (2004). Good girls go to the polling booth, bad boys go everywhere. Women & Politics, 26(3–4), 1–23. doi: 10.1300/J014v26n03_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilie, V., Van Slyke, C., Green, G., & Hao, L. (2005). Gender differences in perceptions and use of communication technologies: A diffusion of innovation approach. Information Resources Management Journal, 18(3), 13–31. doi: 10.4018/irmj.2005070102
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, L. A., Zhao, Y., Kolenic III, A., Fitzgerald, H. E., Harold, R., & Von Eye, A. (2008). Race, gender, and information technology use: The new digital divide. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 11(4), 437–442. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0157
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jennings, M. K., & Niemi, R. G. (1981). Generations and politics: A panel study of young adults and their parents. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Junco, R. (2013). Comparing actual and self-reported measures of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 626–631. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpowitz, C. F., & Mendelberg, T. (2014). The silent sex: Gender, deliberation, and institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kathlene, L. (1994). Power and influence in state legislative policymaking: The interaction of gender and position in committee hearing debates. American Political Science Review, 88(3), 560–576. doi: 10.2307/2944795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, K. M., & Petrocik, J. R. (1999). The changing politics of American men: Understanding the sources of the gender gap. American Journal of Political Science, 43(3), 864–887. doi: 10.2307/2991838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimbrough, A. M., Guadagno, R. E., Muscanell, N. L., & Dill, J. (2013). Gender differences in mediated communication: Women connect more than do men. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 896–900. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D. (2012). Taking our country back: The crafting of networked politics from Howard Dean to Barack Obama. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, N., & Kirkup, G. (2007). Gender and cultural differences in Internet use: A study of China and the UK. Computers & Education, 48, 301–317. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luskin, R. C. (1990). “Explaining political sophistication. Political Behavior, 12(4), 331–361. doi: 10.1007/BF00992793
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, C., Hoffmann, C. P., & Meckel, M. (2014). Beyond just politics: A systematic literature review of online participation. First Monday, 19(7), 1–36. doi: 10.5210/fm.v19i7.5260
   Google Scholar
• Mattei, L. R. W. (1998). Gender and power in American legislative discourse. American Journal of Political Science, 60(2), 440–461.
   Google Scholar
• McGlone, M. S., Aronson, J., & Kobrynowicz, D. (2006). Stereotype threat and the gender gap in political knowledge. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(4), 392–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00314.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A., & Page, D. (2013). The role of news on Facebook: Common yet incidental. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/files/2013/10/facebook_news_10-24-2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mondak, J. J., & Anderson, M. R. (2004). The knowledge gap: A reexamination of gender-based differences in political knowledge. Journal of Politics, 66(2), 492–512. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00161.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here: The Folly of technological solutionism. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
   Google Scholar
• Muscanell, N. L., & Guadagno, R. E. (2012). Make new friends or keep the old: Gender and personality differences in social networking use. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 107–112. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nir, L., & McClurg, S. D. (2015). How institutions affect gender gaps in public opinion expression. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79(2), 544–567. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfv016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2002). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ono, H., & Zavodny, M. (2003). Gender and the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, 84(1), 111–121. doi: 10.1111/1540-6237.t01-1-8401007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pariser, E. (2012). The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pew. (2013). Social media update 2013. Pew Internet & American Life. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/12/30/social-media-update-2013/
   Google Scholar
• Rainie, L., & Smith, A. (2012). Main findings. Pew Internet, Science, & Tech. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/03/12/main-findings-10/
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., … Stern, M. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication, & Society, 18(5), 569–582. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas, H., & Puig-i-Abril, E. (2009). Mobilizers mobilized: Information, expression, mobilization and participation in the digital age. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 902–927. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01475.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutgers Center for American Women and Politics. (2014). Current numbers of women officeholders. Retrieved from http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/levels_of_office/Current_Numbers.php
   Google Scholar
• Sapiro, V. (1983). The political integration of women. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, M., & Heldman, C. (2001). Gender gap or gender gaps? New perspectives on support for Government action and policies. Journal of Politics, 63(1), 59–92. doi: 10.1111/0022-3816.00059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlozman, K. L., Burns, N., & Verba, S. (1999). ‘What happened at work today?’: A Multistage model of gender, employment, and political participation. Journal of Politics, 61(1), 29–53. doi: 10.2307/2647774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher, P., & Morahan-Martin, J. (2001). Gender, Internet and computer attitudes and experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 95–110. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00032-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody. New York, NY: Penguin Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Smith-Hefner, N. (1988). Women and politeness: The Javenese example. Language in Society, 17(4), 535–554. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500013087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandberg, K. (2013). A social media revolution or Just a case of history repeating itself? The use of social media in the 2011 Finnish Parliamentary Elections. New Media & Society, 15(8), 1329–1347. doi: 10.1177/1461444812470612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, J. K. (2006). ‘I’m not a politics person’: Teenage girls, oppositional consciousness, and the meaning of politics. Politics & Gender, 2(3), 329–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theocharis, Y. (2015). The conceptualization of digitally networked participation. Social Media & Society, 1(2), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevor, M. C. (1999). Political socialization, party identification, and the gender gap. Public Opinion Quarterly, 63(1), 62–89. doi: 10.1086/297703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• True, J. (2013). Counting women and balancing gender: Increasing women’s participation in governance. Politics & Gender, 9(3), 351–359. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X13000238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlaner, C. J. (2012). Potentiality and representation: The link between descriptive representation and participation in the United States. Politics & Gender, 8(4), 535–541. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X12000566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verba, S., Burns, N., & Schlozman, K. L. (1997). Knowing and caring about politics: Gender and political engagement. Journal of Politics, 59(4), 1051–1072. doi: 10.2307/2998592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verba, S., Nie, N., & Kim, J. (1978). Participation and political equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic volunteerism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vesnic-Alujevic, L. (2012). Political participation and web 2.0 in Europe: A case study of Facebook. Public Relations Review, 38, 466–470. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vissers, S., & Stolle, D. (2014). The Internet and new modes of political participation: Online versus offline participation. Information, Communication, & Society, 17(8), 937–955. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.867356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vochocova, L., Stetka, V., & Mazak, J. (2016). Good girls don’t comment on politics? Gendered character of online political participation in the Czech Republic. Information, Communication, & Society, 19(10), 1321–1339. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1088881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K., Bode, L., Smithson, A., & Troller-Renfree, S. (2016). Blurred lines: Defining social, news, and political posts on Facebook. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/19331681.2016.1160265
   Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K., Thorson, K., Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Gee, E. (2015). How individual sensitivities to disagreement shape youth political expression on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 281–289. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiser, E. B. (2000a). The functions of Internet use and their social and psychological consequences. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 4(6), 723–743. doi: 10.1089/109493101753376678
   Google Scholar
• Weiser, E. B. (2000b). Gender differences in Internet use patterns and Internet application preferences: A two-sample comparison. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 3(2), 167–178. doi: 10.1089/109493100316012
   Google Scholar
• Wood, W., & Rhodes, N. (1992). Sex differences in interaction style in task groups. In C. Ridgeway (Ed.), Gender, interaction, and inequality (pp. 97–121). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Xenos, M., Vromen, A., & Loader, B. D. (2014). The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication, & Society, 17(2), 151–167. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.871318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar