Opportunities and challenges of the digital lifespan: views of service providers and citizens in the UK

References

• Ahern, S., Eckles, D., Good, N. S., King, S., Naaman, M., & Nair, R. (2007). Over-exposed? Privacy patterns and considerations in online and mobile photo sharing. In Proceedings of CHI’07 (pp. 357–366). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Ammari, T., Kumar, P., Lampe, C., & Schoenebeck, S. (2015). Managing children’s online identities: How parents decide what to disclose about their children online. In Proceedings of CHI’15 (pp. 1895–1904). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., & Tracey, K. (2001). Digital living the impact (or otherwise) of the internet on everyday life. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 456–475. doi:10.1177/00027640121957295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antti, S., Asko, L., Leif, H., Paula, V., & Jaana, N. (2010). Information technologies and transitions in the lives of 55–65-year-olds: The case of colliding life interests. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(11), 803–821. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging Adulthood: A theory of development from the later teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartholomew, M., Schoppe-Sullivan, S., Glassman, M., Kamp Dush, C., & Sullivan, J. (2012). New Parents’ facebook use at the transition to parenthood. Family Relations, 61(3), 455–469. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00708.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, J. (2015, June 16). How we all became obsessed with online privacy. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/general-election-2015/politics-blog/11678157/How-we-all-became-obsessed-with-online-privacy.html
   Google Scholar
• Brandtzæg, P. B., Lüders, M., & Skjetne, J. H. (2010). Too many facebook “friends”? Content sharing and sociability versus the need for privacy in social network sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26(11–12), 1006–1030. doi:10.1080/10447318.2010.516719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkell, J., Fortier, A., Wong, L. Y. C., & Simpson, J. L. (2014). Facebook: Public space, or private space? Information, Communication & Society, 17(8), 974–985. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.870591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office, & GO-Science. (2014, July 8). Futures toolkit for policy-makers and analysts ‒ Publications ‒ GOV.UK. Retrieved April 30, 2015, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/futures-toolkit-for-policy-makers-and-analysts
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2011). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A., & Margetts, H. (2014). Governments and citizens getting to know each other? Open, closed, and big data in public management reform. Policy & Internet, 6(4), 393–417. doi:10.1002/1944-2866.POI377
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, R., Bannister, F., & Kearney, A. (2010). Government website service quality: A study of the Irish revenue online service. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(6), 649–667. doi:10.1057/ejis.2010.45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daou, A., Karuranga, E., Thiam, F., Mellouli, S., & Poulin, D. (2012). Appropriation of online services by citizens: Innovating through a “bottom-up” approach. In Proceedings of DG.O’12 (pp. 68–73). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J. P., Horn, A.-K., & Hughes, B. N. (2009). Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(1), 83–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01494.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durrant, A., Moncur, W., Kirk, D. S., Trujillo-Pisanty, D., & Orzech, K. M. (2016). On presenting a rich picture for stakeholder dialogue. Paper presented at the 2016 design research society, Brighton, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, W. H., & Blank, G. (2013). OxIS 2013 Report: Cultures of the Internet.
   Google Scholar
• Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. (2015). Skills: Priority areas: Digital identity. Retrieved from https://www.epsrc.ac.uk/skills/students/centres/2013cdtexercise/priorityareas/diid/
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J., & Tokunaga, R. S. (2015). Romantic partner monitoring after breakups: Attachment, dependence, distress, and post-dissolution online surveillance via social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(9), 491–498. doi:10.1089/cyber.2015.0123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlong, A., & Cartmel, F. (1997). Young people and social change. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, L., & Hanson, V. L. (2013). Digital motherhood: How does technology help new mothers? In Proceedings of CHI’13 (pp. 313–322). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Grimsley, M., & Meehan, A. (2007). E-government information systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 134–148. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoofnagle, C. J., King, J., Li, S., & Turow, J. (2010). How different are young adults from older adults when it comes to information privacy attitudes and policies? (SSRN Scholarly Paper). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1589864
   Google Scholar
• Hulme, A. (2014). Next steps: Life transitions and retirement in the 21st century. Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. Retrieved from http://gulbenkian.org.uk/files/01-07-12-Next%20steps%20-%20Life%20transitions%20and%20retirement%20in%20the%2021st%20century.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. F. (2001). Social ties and mental health. Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 78(3), 458–467. doi:10.1093/jurban/78.3.458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., Ureel, L. C.II, King, H., & Wallace, C. (2013). Lessons from our elders: Identifying obstacles to digital literacy through direct engagement. In Proceedings of PETRA’13 (pp. 22:1–22:8). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D. B., Goede, J., & Shryock, R. (2010). Clicking for friendship: Social network sites and the medium of personhood. MedieKultur. Journal of Media and Communication Research, 26(49), 137–150. doi: 10.7146/mediekultur.v26i49.2585
   Google Scholar
• Lenz, B. (2001). The transition from adolescence to young Adulthood: A theoretical perspective. The Journal of School Nursing, 17(6), 300–306. doi:10.1177/10598405010170060401
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindley, S. E., Harper, R., & Sellen, A. (2009). Desiring to be in touch in a changing Communications landscape: Attitudes of older adults. In Proceedings of CHI’09 (pp. 1693–1702). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., & Wright, P. (2004). Technology as Experience. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mergel, I. (2014). Social media adoption: Toward a representative, responsive or interactive government? In Proceedings of DG.O’14 (pp. 163–170). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Ofcom. (2015). Adults’ media use and attitudes Report 2015. Retrieved from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/research-publications/adults/media-lit-10years/
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, M. D., Gonzalez, V. M., Favela, J., & Santana, P. C. (2009). Home-based communication system for older adults and their remote family. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(3), 609–618. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, J. (2012). The right to be forgotten. Stanford Law Review Online, 64, 88.
   Google Scholar
• Rowley, J. (2011). E-government stakeholders ‒ who are they and what do they want? International Journal of Information Management, 31(1), 53–62. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schensul, S. L., Schensul, J. J., & LeCompte, M. D. (1999). Essential ethnographic methods: Observations, interviews, and questionnaires. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shackleton, P., Fisher, J., & Dawson, L. (2004). Internal and external factors impacting on e-government maturity: A local government case study. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 6(4), 36–50. doi:10.1080/15228053.2004.10856053
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. L. (2011). Limitations to building institutional trustworthiness through e-government: A comparative study of two e-services in Chile. Journal of Information Technology, 26(1), 78–93. doi:10.1057/jit.2010.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thosand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, C.-W., Pan, S. L., & Lim, E. T. K. (2005). Managing stakeholder interests in e-government Implementation: Lessons learned from a Singapore e-government Project. Journal of Global Information Management, 13(1), 31–53. doi:10.4018/jgim.2005010102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trujillo-Pisanty, D., Durrant, A., Martindale, S., James, S., & Collomosse, J. (2014). Admixed portrait: Reflections on being online as a new parent. In Proceedings of DIS’14 (pp. 503–512). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, P., & McCarthy, J. (2010). Experience-centered design: Designers, users, and communities in dialogue. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
   Google Scholar