1,321
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Online amplification of air pollution risk perception: the moderating role of affect in information

&
Pages 80-93 | Received 11 Oct 2015, Accepted 11 Nov 2016, Published online: 29 Nov 2016

References

  • Barnett, J., & Breakwell, G. M. (2001). Risk perception and experience: Hazard personality profiles and individual differences. Risk Analysis, 21(1), 171–178. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.211099
  • Bateman, I., Dent, S., Peters, E., Slovic, P., & Starmer, C. (2007). The affect heuristic and the attractiveness of simple gambles. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20(4), 365–380. doi:10.1002/bdm.558
  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Bickerstaff, K. (2004). Risk perception research: Socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution. Environment International, 30(6), 827–840. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2003.12.001
  • Blatt, M. (2014). China's most polluted cities of 2013. Retrieved from http://www.chinahush.com/2014/02/13/chinas-most-polluted-cities-of-2013/.
  • Carey, J. (1992). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Chen, Y., Ebenstein, A., Greenstone, M., & Li, H. (2013). Evidence on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from China's Huai River policy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(32), 12936–12941. doi:10.1073/pnas.1300018110.
  • Chung, I. J. (2011). Social amplification of risk in the internet environment. Risk Analysis, 31(12), 1883–1896. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01623.x
  • CNNIC. (2016). The 38th statistical report on Internet development in China (in Chinese). Retrieved from https://www.cnnic.cn/gywm/xwzx/rdxw/2016/201608/W020160803204144417902.pdf
  • Crawford, J. R., & Henry, J. D. (2004). The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43(3), 245–265. doi:10.1348/0144665031752934
  • Dahlstrom, M. F., Dudo, A., & Brossard, D. (2012). Precision of information, sensational information, and self-efficacy information as message-level variables affecting risk perceptions. Risk Analysis, 32(1), 155–166. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01641.x
  • Delanty, G. (1999). Social theory in a changing world. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Dutta, M. J., Pfister, R., & Kosmoski, C. (2010). Consumer evaluation of genetic information online: The role of quality on attitude and behavioral intentions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(4), 592–605. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01504.x
  • Edmunds, A., & Morris, A. (2000). The problem of information overload in business organisations: A review of the literature. International Journal of Information Management, 20(1), 17–28. doi:10.1016/S0268-4012(99)00051-1
  • Feldman, L., Myers, T. A., Hmielowski, J. D., & Leiserowitz, A. (2014). The mutual reinforcement of media selectivity and effects: Testing the reinforcing spirals framework in the context of global warming. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 590–611. doi:10.1111/jcom.12108
  • Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(1), 1–17. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.589.6788&rep=rep1&type=pdf doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<1::AID-BDM333>3.0.CO;2-S
  • Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., & Combs, B. (1978). How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 9(2), 127–152. doi:10.1007/BF00143739
  • Fukazawa, N. (2005). Risk perception and human behavior. Tokyo: Kobundo Shuppansha.
  • Greening, L., Dollinger, S. J., & Pitz, G. (1996). Adolescents’ perceived risk and personal experience with natural disasters: An evaluation of cognitive heuristics. Acta Psychologica, 91(1), 27–38. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(94)00040-9
  • Griffin, R. J., Dunwoody, S., & Neuwirth, K. (1999). Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. Environmental Research, 80(2), S230–S245. doi:10.1006/enrs.1998.3940
  • Kahlor, L. A. (2010). PRISM: A planned risk information seeking model. Health Communication, 25(4), 345–356. doi:10.1080/10410231003775172
  • Kahneman, D. (2012). Thinking, fast and slow. London: Penguin.
  • Kasperson, J. X., Kasperson, R. E., Pidgeon, N., & Slovic, P. (2003). The social amplification of risk: Assessing fifteen years of research and theory. In N. Pidgeon, R. E. Kasperson, & P. Slovic (Eds.), The social amplification of risk (pp. 13–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kasperson, R. E., & Kasperson, J. X. (1991). Hidden hazards. In D. G. Mayo & R. D. Hollander (Eds.), Acceptable evidence: Science and values in risk management (pp. 9–28). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., … Ratick, S. (1988). The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis, 8(2), 177–187. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x
  • Kenny, D. A. (2015). Moderator variables: Introduction. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/cm/moderation.htm
  • Kitzinger, J. (1999). Researching risk and the media. Health, Risk & Society, 1(1), 55–69. doi:10.1080/13698579908407007
  • Kull, S., Ramsay, C., & Lewis, E. (2003). Misperceptions, the media, and the Iraq War. Political Science Quarterly, 118(4), 569–598. doi:10.1002/j.1538-165X.2003.tb00406.x
  • Kung, Y.-W., & Chen, S.-H. (2012). Perception of earthquake risk in Taiwan: Effects of gender and past earthquake experience. Risk Analysis, 32(9), 1535–1546. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01760.x
  • Lai, J. C.-l., & Tao, J. (2003). Perceptions of environmental hazards in Hong Kong Chinese. Risk Analysis, 23(4), 669–684. doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00346
  • Lazo, J. K., Kinnell, J. C., & Fisher, A. (2000). Expert and layperson perceptions of ecosystem risk. Risk Analysis, 20(2), 179–194. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.202019
  • Lippmann, W. (2004). Public opinion. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
  • Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267–286. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267
  • Murdock, G., Petts, J., & Horlick-Jones, T. (2003). After amplification: Rethinking the role of the media in risk communication. In N. Pidgeon, R. E. Kasperson, & P. Slovic (Eds.), The social amplification of risk (pp. 156–178). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nakayachi, K. (2006). Risuku no monosashi – Anzen anshin seikatsu wa ari uruka (in Japanese). Tokyo: NHK Publishing.
  • Peters, E., & Slovic, P. (1996). The role of affect and world views as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(16), 1427–1453. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb00079.x
  • Pew Research Center. (2015). Corruption, pollution, inequality are top concerns in China: Many worry about threats to traditions and culture. Retrieved from http://www.pewglobal.org/files/2015/09/Pew-Research-Center-China-Report-FINAL-September-24-2015.pdf
  • Reynolds, B., & Seeger, M. W. (2005). Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model. Journal of Health Communication, 10(1), 43–55. doi:10.1080/10810730590904571
  • Rohde, R. A., & Muller, R. A. (2015). Air pollution in China: Mapping of concentrations and sources. PloS one, 10(8), e0135749. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135749
  • Skarlatidou, A., Cheng, T., & Haklay, M. (2012). What do lay people want to know about the disposal of nuclear waste? A mental model approach to the design and development of an online risk communication. Risk Analysis, 32(9), 1496–1511. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01773.x
  • Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280–285. doi:10.1126/science.3563507
  • Slovic, P. (2010). The more who die, the less we care. In P. Slovic (Ed.), The feeling of risk: New perspectives on risk perception (pp. 69–77). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  • Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24(2), 311–322. doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x
  • Sutton, J., Palen, L., & Shklovski, I. (2008). Emergent use of social media in the 2007 southern California wildfires. Retrieved from http://jeannettesutton.com/uploads/BackchannelsISCRAM08.pdf
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
  • Wachinger, G., Renn, O., Begg, C., & Kuhlicke, C. (2013). The risk perception paradox-implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Analysis, 33(6), 1049–1065. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x
  • Wahlberg, A. A., & Sjöberg, L. (2000). Risk perception and the media. Journal of Risk Research, 3(1), 31–50. doi:10.1080/136698700376699
  • Wang, R. Y., & Strong, D. M. (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 5–33. doi:10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099
  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
  • Xie, X., Wang, M., & Xu, L. (2003). What risks are Chinese people concerned about? Risk Analysis, 23(4), 685–695. doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00347.
  • Zajonc, R. B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist, 39(2), 117–123. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.39.2.117
  • Zhang, J. (1994). Environmental hazards in the Chinese public's eyes. Risk Analysis, 14(2), 163–167. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00041.x
  • Zhu, D., Xie, X., & Gan, Y. (2011). Information source and valence: How information credibility influences earthquake risk perception. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(2011), 129–136. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.09.005

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.