The Google voter: search engines and elections in the new media ecology

References

• Anstead, N. (2016). A different beast? Televised election debates in parliamentary democracies. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21, 508–526. doi:10.1177/1940161216649953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anstead, N., & O’Loughlin, B. (2011). The emerging viewtariat and BBC question time: Television debate and real-time commenting online. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16, 440–462. doi:10.1177/1940161211415519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awan, A., Hoskins, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2011). Media and radicalisation: Connectivity and terrorism in the new media ecology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D. (2010). Making the white folk angry: The media, ‘race’ and electoral politics in the United Kingdom in 2010. Platform: Journal of Media and Communication, 3, 8–25. Retrieved from http://platformjmc.com/
   Google Scholar
• Cantijoch, M., Cutts, D., & Gibson, R. (2013). Internet use and political engagement: The role of e-campaigning as a pathway to online political participation. UC Irvine Center for the Study of Democracy. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/538243k2
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2012). Recent shifts in the relationship between the Internet and democratic engagement in Britain and the United States: Granularity, informational exuberance, and political learning. In E. Anduiza, M. Jensen, & L. Jorba (Eds.), Digital media and political engagement worldwide (pp. 39–55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chai, S., & Sasaki, N. (2011). Using online tools to assess public responses to climate change mitigation policies in Japan. Future Internet, 3, 117–129. doi:10.3390/fi3020117
   Google Scholar
• Dayan, D. (2013). Overhearing in the public sphere. Retrieved from http://www.deliberatelyconsidered.com/2013/02/overhearing-in-the-public-sphere/
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, W. H., & Blank, G. (2013). Cultures of the Internet: The Internet in Britain. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute. Retrieved from http://oxis.oii.ox.ac.uk/reports/
   Google Scholar
• Elmer, G. (2013). Live research: Twittering an election debate. New Media & Society, 15, 18–30. doi:10.1177/1461444812457328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, R., & Robertson, R. (2015). The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, E4512–E4521. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419828112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, D., Ford, R., & Somerville, W. (2010). Immigration and the election. Renewal, 18, 102–114. Retrieved from http://renewal.org.uk/articles/immigration-and-the-election
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, B., Rowlands, I., & Nicholas, D. (2009). The Google generation: Are ICT innovations changing information-seeking behaviour? Oxford: Chandos.
   Google Scholar
• Halavais, A. (2009). Search engine society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, M., & Smith, A. (2013). ‘My husband, my hero’: Selling the political spouses in the 2010 general election. Journal of Political Marketing, 12, 197–210. doi:10.1080/15377857.2013.781473
   Google Scholar
• Hillis, K., Petit, M., & Jarrett, K. (2013). Google and the culture of search. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hindman, M. (2009). The myth of digital democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskins, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2010). War and media: The emergence of diffused war. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskins, A., & Tulloch, J. (2016). Risk and hyperconnectivity: Media and memories of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, P. (2006). New media campaigns and the managed citizen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaeserbauer, M., Hohenstatt, R., & Reed, R. (2012). Direct versus search engine traffic: An innovative approach to demand analysis in the property market. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 5, 392–413. doi: 10.1108/17538271211268538
   Google Scholar
• Kluver, A. R. (2002). The logic of new media in international affairs. New Media & Society, 4, 499–517. doi:10.1177/146144402321466787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D. (2012). Taking our country back: The crafting of networked politics from Howard Dean to Barack Obama. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, A. (2012). The personalisation of politics in the UK: Mediated leadership from Attlee to Cameron. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lilleker, D., & Vedel, T. (2013). The Internet in campaigns and elections. In W. Dutton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Internet studies (pp. 401–420). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovink, G. (2009). Society of the query: The Googlization of our lives. In K. Becker & F. Stalder (Eds.), Deep search: The politics of search beyond Google (pp. 45–53). Innsbruck: Studien Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lui, C., Metaxas, P. T., & Mustafaraj, E. (2011). On the pre-dictability of the US elections through search volume activity. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/gJ6t8j
   Google Scholar
• Lum, C. M. K. (2000). Introduction: The intellectual roots of media ecology. The New Jersey Journal of Communication, 8, 1–7. doi:10.1080/15456870009367375
   Google Scholar
• Mager, A. (2012). Algorithmic ideology: How capitalist society shapes search engines. Information, Communication & Society, 15, 769–787. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.676056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molotch, H., & Lester, M. (1974). News as purposive behavior: On the strategic use of routine events, accidents, and scandals. American Sociological Review, 39, 101–112. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/journal/amersocirevi doi: 10.2307/2094279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Levy, D. A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2016). Reuters institute digital news report 2016. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from http://www.digitalnewsreport.org/
   Google Scholar
• Nuti, S. V., Wayda, B., Runasinghe, I., Wang, S., Dryer, R. P., Chen, S. I., & Murugiah, K. (2014). The use of Google Trends in health care research: A systematic review. PLOS One, 9, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates, S. (2011). Going native: The value in reconceptualizing international internet service providers as domestic media outlets. Philosophy and Technology, 24, 391–409. doi:10.1007/s13347-011-0045-4
   Google Scholar
• Parry, K., & Richardson, K. (2011). Political imagery in the British general election of 2010: The curious case of ‘Nick Clegg’. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 13, 474–489. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2011.00452.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postman, N. (1970). The reformed English curriculum. In A. C. Eurich (Ed.), The shape of the future in American secondary education (pp. 160–168). New York, NY: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, K., Brenner, J., & Rainie, L. (2012). Search engine use 2012. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
   Google Scholar
• Rentschler, C. A., & Thrift, S. C. (2015). Doing feminism in the network: Networked laughter and the “Binders full of Women” meme. Feminist Theory, 16, 329–359. doi: 10.1177/1464700115604136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, J. (2016). Scottish TV coverage of the referendum campaign from September 2012 to September 2014. In N. Blain, D. Hutchison, & G. Hassan (Eds.), Scotland’s referendum and the media: National and international perspectives (pp. 59–69). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharkow, M., & Vogelsgang, J. (2011). Measuring the public agenda using search engine queries. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 23, 104–113. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edq048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheitle, C. (2011). Google’s insights for search: A note evaluating the use of search engine data in social research. Social Science Quarterly, 92, 285–295. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00768.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanyer, J. (2013). Intimate politics: Publicity, privacy and the personal lives of politicians in media-saturated democracies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strate, L. (2006). Echoes and reflections: On media ecology as a field of study. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strate, L., & Lum, C. M. K. (2000). Lewis Mumford and the ecology of technics. The New Jersey Journal of Communication, 8, 56–78. doi:10.1080/15456870009367379
   Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J. (2014). Presidential campaigning in the Internet age. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trevisan, F. (2014). Search engines: From social science objects to academic inquiry tools. First Monday, 19(11). doi:10.5210/fm.v19i11.5237
   Google Scholar
• Vaidhyanathan, S. (2011). The Googlization of everything (and why we should worry). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vergeer, M. (2013). Politics, elections and online campaigning: Past, present … and a peek into the future. New Media & Society, 15, 9–17. doi:10.1177/1461444812457327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wring, D., & Ward, S. (2010). The media and the 2010 campaign: The television election? Parliamentary Affairs, 63, 802–817. doi:10.1093/pa/gsq024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasseri, T., & Bright, J. (2013). Can electoral popularity be predicted using socially generated big data? Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/pdf/1312.2818v1.pdf
   Google Scholar