The rationalization process of online game cheating behaviors

References

• Adrian, A. (2010). Beyond griefing: Virtual crime. Computer Law & Security Review, 26, 640–648. doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2010.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Baughman, N. E., & Levine, B. N. (2001). Cheat-proof playout for centralized and distributed online games. Paper presented at the INFOCOM 2001. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Proceedings. IEEE. doi:10.1109/infcom.2001.916692
   Google Scholar
• Berger, R., & McDougall, J. (2013). Reading videogames as (authorless) literature. Literacy, 47, 142–149. doi: 10.1111/lit.12004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn, J., Kourtellis, N., Skvoretz, J., Ripeanu, M., & Iamnitchi, A. (2014). Cheating in online games: A social network perspective. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 13, 1–25. doi: 10.1145/2602570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn, J., & Kwak, H. (2014). STFU NOOB!: Predicting crowdsourced decisions on toxic behavior in online games. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web, Seoul, Korea. doi:10.1145/2566486.2567987
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn, J., Simha, R., Kourtellis, N., Zuo, X., Ripeanu, M., Skvoretz, J., & Iamnitchi, A. (2012). Branded with a scarlet “C”: Cheaters in a gaming social network. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web, Lyon, France. doi:10.1145/2187836.2187848
   Google Scholar
• Bruckman, A., Curtis, P., Figallo, C., & Laurel, B. (1994). Approaches to managing deviant behavior in virtual communities. Paper presented at the CHI Conference Companion. doi:10.1145/259963.26023
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S., Kilduff, M., & Tasselli, S. (2013). Social network analysis: Foundations and frontiers on advantage. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 527–547. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, D., & Munday, R. (2011). A dictionary of media and communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, V. H. H., & Wu, Y. (2015). Group identification as a mediator of the effect of players’ anonymity on cheating in online games. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34, 658–667. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2013.843721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, S.-C., & Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising, 30, 47–75. doi: 10.2501/IJA-30-1-047-075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consalvo, M. (2005). Gaining advantage – how videogame players define and negotiate cheating. Paper presented at the Changing Views, Worlds in Play Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Cover, R. (2006). Audience inter/active: Interactive media, narrative control and reconceiving audience history. New Media & Society, 8, 139–158. doi: 10.1177/1461444806059922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, A. J. (2005). An exploration of middle and high school students’ perceptions of deviant behavior when using computers and the internet. The Journal of Technology Studies, 31, 70–80. doi: 10.21061/jots.v31i2.a.2
   Google Scholar
• De Leo, J. A., & Wulfert, E. (2013). Problematic internet use and other risky behaviors in college students: An application of problem-behavior theory. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27, 133–141. doi: 10.1037/a0030823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Simone, J. J., Verbruggen, T., Kuo, L.-H., & Mutlu, B. (2012). Is cheating a human function? The roles of presence, state hostility, and enjoyment in an unfair video game. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 2351–2358. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooley, J. J., Pyżalski, J., & Cross, D. (2009). Cyberbullying versus face-to-face bullying. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 182–188. doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S., Smith, J. H., & Tosca, S. P. (2008). Understanding video games: The essential introduction. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gabbiadini, A., Riva, P., Andrighetto, L., Volpato, C., & Bushman, B. J. (2014). Interactive effect of moral disengagement and violent video games on self-control, cheating, and aggression. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 451–458. doi: 10.1177/1948550613509286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlen, K. R. (2012). Academic dishonesty and video game play: Is new media use changing conceptions of cheating? Computers & Education, 59, 1145–1152. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hristova, D., Musolesi, M., & Mascolo, C. (2014, June). Keep your friends close and your Facebook friends closer: A multiplex network approach to the analysis of offline and online socialties. Paper presented at the International Conference of Weblogs and Social Media, Ann Arbor, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, J. G., Brunelle, T. J., Prescott, A. T., & Sargent, J. D. (2014). A longitudinal study of risk-glorifying video games and behavioral deviance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 300–325. doi: 10.1037/a0036058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsson, M., & Taylor, T. L. (2003). The Sopranos meets EverQuest: Social networking in massively multiplayer online games. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2003 Digital Arts and Culture (DAC) conference, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Kabus, P., Terpstra, W. W., Cilia, M., & Buchmann, A. P. (2005). Addressing cheating in distributed MMOGs. Paper presented at the Proceedings of 4th ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Network and system support for games, Hawthorne, NY. doi:10.1145/1103599.1103607
   Google Scholar
• Kimppa, K. K., & Bissett, A. K. (2005). The ethical significance of cheating in online computer games. International Review of Information Ethics, 4, 31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health & Illness, 16, 103–121. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, R. M., Limber, S., Limber, S. P., & Agatston, P. W. (2012). Cyberbullying: Bullying in the digital age. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kücklich, J. (2007). Homo deludens. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 13, 355–367. doi: 10.1177/1354856507081951
   Google Scholar
• Kwak, H., & Blackburn, J. (2015). Linguistic analysis of toxic behavior in an online video game. In L. M. Aiello & D. McFarland (Eds.), Social informatics (pp. 209–217). New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Laurens, P., Paige, R. F., Brooke, P. J., & Chivers, H. (2007). A novel approach to the detection of cheating in multiplayer online games. 12th IEEE International Conference on Engineering Complex Computer Systems (ICECCS 2007). doi:10.1109/iceccs.2007.11
   Google Scholar
• Lessig, L. (2003). Law regulating code regulating law. Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 35, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Li, K., Ding, S., McCreary, D., & Webb, S. (2004). Analysis of state exposure control to prevent cheating in online games. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 14th international workshop on Network and operating systems support for digital audio and video, Cork, Ireland. doi:10.1145/1005847.1005878
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (1999). New media, new audiences? New Media and Society, 1, 59–66. doi: 10.1177/1461444899001001010
   Google Scholar
• Lunt, P., & Livingstone, S. (1996). Rethinking the focus group in media and communications research. Journal of Communication, 46, 79–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01475.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1987). The focused interview and focus groups: Continuities and discontinuities. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, 550–566. doi: 10.1086/269057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mönch, C., Grimen, G., & Midtstraum, R. (2006). Protecting online games against cheating. Paper presented at the Proceedings of 5th ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Network and system support for games, Singapore. doi:10.1145/1230040.1230087
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 129–152. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parti, K. (2008). Deviances in the virtual reality or the character-altering power of virtual communities. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law & Criminal Justice, 16, 325–343. doi: 10.1163/157181708X333373
   Google Scholar
• Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1998). Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of Computer-Mediated Communication. Communication Research, 25, 689–715. doi: 10.1177/009365098025006006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šisler, V. (2009). Palestine in pixels: The holy land, Arab-Israeli conflict, and reality construction in video games. Middle East Journal of Culture & Communication, 2, 275–292. doi: 10.1163/187398509X12476683126509
   Google Scholar
• Trepte, S., Reinecke, L., & Juechems, K. (2012). The social side of gaming: How playing online computer games creates online and offline social support. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 832–839. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utz, S. (2000). Social information processing in MUDs: The development of friendships in virtual worlds. Journal of Online Behavior. Retrieved from http://www.behavior.net/JOB/v1n1/utz.html
   Google Scholar
• van Vugt, H. C., Hoorn, J. F., Konijn, E. A., & de Bie Dimitriadou, A. (2006). Affective affordances: Improving interface character engagement through interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64, 874–888. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vázquez, I. S., & Consalvo, M. (2015). Cheating in social network games. New Media & Society, 17, 829–844. doi: 10.1177/1461444813516835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (2011). Theories of computer-mediated communication and interpersonal relations. The Handbook of Interpersonal Communication, 4, 443–479.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, S. D., & Soh, S. (2007). Cheating in networked computer games: A review. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on digital interactive media in entertainment and arts, Perth, Australia. doi:10.1145/1306813.1306839
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, B., Boase, J., & Chen, W. (2002). The networked nature of community: Online and offline. It & Society, 1, 151–165.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999). Networks in the global village. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. (2006). Groups and goblins: The social and civic impact of an online game. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50, 651–670. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem5004_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., & Chen, V. H. H. (2013). A social-cognitive approach to online game cheating. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2557–2567. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yahyavi, A., & Kemme, B. (2013). Peer-to-peer architectures for massively multiplayer online games: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 46, 1–51. doi: 10.1145/2522968.2522977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, J., & Randell, B. (2005). A systematic classification of cheating in online games. Paper presented at the Proceedings of 4th ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Network and system support for games, Hawthorne, NY. doi:10.1145/1103599.1103606
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, S., & John, L. (2008). Dynamic Bayesian approach for detecting cheats in multi-player online games. Multimedia Systems, 14, 221–236. doi: 10.1007/s00530-008-0113-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar