Exposure diversity as a design principle for recommender systems

References

• Adomavicius, G., & Kwon, Y. (2009). Improving recommendation diversity using ranking-based techniques (Working Paper). Retrieved from http://ids.csom.umn.edu/faculty/gedas/NSFCareer/Diversity-Aug2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Adomavicius, G., & Kwon, Y. (2011). Maximizing aggregate recommendation diversity: A graph-theoretic approach. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Novelty and Diversity in Recommender Systems (DiveRS 2011, Chicago).
   Google Scholar
• Berdichevsky, D., & Neuenschwander, E. (1999). Toward an ethics of persuasive technology. Communications of the ACM, 42, 51–58. doi: 10.1145/301353.301410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin, I. (1990). Four essays on liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, L. (2008). The ethics of nudge. In T. Grüne-Yanoff, & S.O. Hansson (Eds.), Preference change: Approaches from philosophy, economics and psychology. Berlin: Springer, 207–219.
   Google Scholar
• Bozdag, E. (2013). Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalization. Ethics and Information Technology, 15, 209–227. doi: 10.1007/s10676-013-9321-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucher, T. (2016). The algorithmic imaginary: Exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, online ahead of print, doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burri, M. (2016). Nudging as a tool of media policy. Understanding and fostering exposure diversity in the age of digital media. In K. Mathis, & A. Tor (Eds.), Nudging – possibilities, limitations, and applications in European law and economics (pp. 227–248). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Christoffel, F., Paudel, B., Newell, C., & Bernstein, A. (2015). Blockbusters and Wallflowers: Accurate, Diverse, and Scalable Recommendations with Random Walks. Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2007). Recommendation Rec(2007)2 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on media pluralism and diversity of media content. Strasbourg, 31 January 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2011). Recommendation CM/Rec(2011)7 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on a new notion of media. Strasbourg, 21 September 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. (2011). Re-constructing digital democracy: An outline of four 'positions'. New Media & Society, 13, 855–872. doi: 10.1177/1461444810389569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, C. (2012). Adversarial design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs. (2014). Vision on telecommunication, media and internet: In-depth report (Visie op Telecommunication, Media en Internet: Verdieping), Ministerie Economische Zaken, Den Haag.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, G. (1988). The theory and practice of autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ekstrand, M. D., Kluver, D., Harper, F. M., & Konstan, J. A. (2015). Letting users choose recommender algorithms: An experimental study. Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013). Preparing for a fully converged audiovisual world: Growth, creation and value. Green paper COM(2013)231 final, Brussels, 24.4.2013.
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights. (2000). Özgür Gündem v. Turkey. Strasbourg, 16 March 2000, No. 23144/93, para. 43.
   Google Scholar
• Facebook. (2016). Recommending items to more than a billion people. Retrieved from https://code.facebook.com/posts/861999383875667/recommending-items-to-more-than-a-billion-people
   Google Scholar
• Feinberg, J. (1983). Autonomy, sovereignty, and privacy: Moral ideals in the constitution. Notre Dame Law Review, 58, 445–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, R. (2012). News plurality in a digital world. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K., & Stround, N. J. (2014). Partisan paths to exposure diversity: Differences in pro- and counterattitudinal news consumption. Journal of Communication, 64, 680–701. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge, M., Gedikli, F., & Jannach, D. (2011). Placing High-Diversity Items in Top-N Recommendation Lists. Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Intelligent Techniques for Web Personalization & Recommender Systems. Retrieved from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-756/paper09.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Grummell, B. (2009). The educational character of public service broadcasting: From cultural enrichment to knowledge society. European Journal of Communication, 24, 267–285. doi: 10.1177/0267323109336756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16, 411–426. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, P. G., & Jespersen, A. M. (2013). Nudge and the manipulation of choice. a framework for the responsible use of the nudge approach to behaviour change in public policy. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 1, 3–28. doi: 10.1017/S1867299X00002762
   Google Scholar
• Harper, F. M., Xu, F., Kaur, H., Condiff, K., Chang, S., & Terveen, L. (2015). Putting users in control of their recommendations. Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. International Journal of Communication. (2015). 1324–1340.
   Google Scholar
• Helberger, N. (2011). Diversity by design. Journal of Information Policy, 1, 441–469. doi: 10.5325/jinfopoli.1.2011.0441
   Google Scholar
• Helberger, N. (2012). Exposure diversity as a policy goal. The Journal of Media Law, 4, 65–92. doi: 10.5235/175776312802483880
   Google Scholar
• Helberger, N. (2015). Merely facilitating or actively stimulating diverse media choices? public service media at the crossroad. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1324–1340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• High Level Expert Group on Media Freedom and Pluralism. (2013). A free and pluralistic media to sustain European democracy. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• ICRI, KU Leuven, MMTC Jönköping International Business School, CMCS, Central European University, Ernst & Young Consultancy. (2009). Independent study on indicators for media pluralism: A monitoring tool for assessing risks for media pluralism in the EU member states. Leuven: University of Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Kamba, T., Bharat, K. A., & Albers, M. C. (1995). The Krakatoa Chronicle-an interactive, personalized newspaper on the Web. Proceedings of the Fourth International World Wide Web Conference, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Kamishima, T., Akaho, S., & Asoh, H. (2012). Enhancement of the Neutrality in Recommendation. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Human Decision Making in Recommender Systems. Retrieved from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-893/paper2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Karppinen, K. (2013). Rethinking media pluralism. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, M. T., O’Brien, M., & Smith, B. (2008). Are people biased in their use of search engines? Communications of the ACM, 51(2), 49–52. doi: 10.1145/1314215.1314224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komiak, S. Y. X., Wang, W., & Benbasat, I. (2005). Trust building in virtual salespersons versus in human salespersons: Similarities and differences. e-Service Journal, 3(3), 49–64. doi: 10.2979/esj.2004.3.3.49
   Google Scholar
• Korthals, M. (2013). De Overheid als Verleidster. Ethische vragen rond gedragsbeinvloeding door de overheid ten gunste van duurzemere gedragspartonen en leefstijlen, in ALI – Raad voor de leefomgeving en instrastructuur (eds.), Raad voor de leefomgeving en infrastructuur, Essays Duurzame Gedragspartronen, Augustus 2013, 31–48.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, A. D., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 8788–8790. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320040111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lathia, N., Hailes, S., Capra, L., & Amatriain, X. (2010). Temporal diversity in recommender systems. Proceeding of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, Geneva, Switzerland, 210–217.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Dolan, P., & Rønby Pedersen, E. (2010). Personalized news recommendation based on click behavior. Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Intelligent User Interfaces.
   Google Scholar
• McNee, S. M. (2006). Meeting user information needs in recommender systems (PhD dissertation). Minnesota: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• McQuail, D. (1992). Media performance, mass communication and the public interest. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics. Thinking the world politically. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Munson, S., Zhou, D. X., & Resnick, P. (2009). Sidelines: An algorithm for increasing diversity in news and opinion aggregators. Proceedings of ICWSM09 Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, San Jose, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Napoli, P. (1997). Rethinking program diversity assessment: An audience-centred approach. Journal of Media Economics, 10(4), 59–74. doi: 10.1207/s15327736me1004_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napoli, P. (1999). Deconstructing the diversity principle. Journal of Communication, 49(4), 7–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02815.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napoli, P. (2014). Digital intermediaries and the public interest standard in algorithm governance, Retrieved from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/mediapolicyproject/2014/11/07/digital-intermediaries-and-thepublic-interest-standard-in-algorithm-governance/
   Google Scholar
• Napoli, P., & Sybblis, S. T. (2007). Access to audiences as a first amendment right. Virginia Journal of Law and Technology, 12, 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Neuberger, C., & Lobgis, F. (2010). Die Bedeutung des Internets im Rahmen der Vielfaltssicherung. Berlin: Vistas.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T., Hui, P.-M., Harper, F. M., Terveen, L., & Konstan, J. A. (2014). Exploring the filter bubble: the effect of using recommender systems on content diversity. Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World Wide Web.
   Google Scholar
• Ofcom. (2012, June 19). Measuring media plurality (Report). London: Author. Retrieved from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/measuring-plurality/statement/statement.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ozturk, P. & Han, Y. (2014). Similar, yet diverse: A recommender system. Collective Intelligence Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble. What the internet is hiding from You. New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Rieder, B. (2009). Democratizing search? From critique to society-oriented design. In K. Becker, & F. Stalder (Eds.), Deep search. The politics of search beyond google (pp. 133–151). Innsbruck: StudienVerlag.
   Google Scholar
• Roessler, B. (2010). Over autonomie en rechtvaardigheid, Inaugural Speech, University of Amsterdam, 2 July 2010. Retrieved from http://www.oratiereeks.nl/upload/pdf/PDF-21559789056296490_text_HR_crop.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schönbach, K. (2007). ‘The own in the foreign’: Reliable surprise – an important function of the media? Media, Culture & Society, 29, 344–353. doi: 10.1177/0163443707074269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, W., Dreyer, S., & Hagemeier, S. (2012). Machtverschiebung in der öffentlichen Kommunikation. Bonn: Friedrich-Ebert Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Sheth, S. K., Bell, J. S., Arora, N., & Kaiser, G. E. (2011). Towards diversity in recommendations using social networks. Columbia University Academic Commons. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10022/AC:P:10677
   Google Scholar
• Spahn, A. (2012). And lead us (Not) into persuasion … ? Persuasive technology and the ethics of communication. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8(4), 633–650. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9278-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, B. (2009). Digitale Programmnavigation. Medie Perspektiven, 2009, 233–246.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UK House of Lords. (2013). Media plurality. Report of the Select Committee on Communications, 1st Report of Session 2013-14. Retrieved from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201314/ldselect/ldcomm/120/120.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Valcke, P. (2004). Digitale Diversiteit – Convergentie van Media-, Telecommunicatie- en Mededinginsrecht. Brussel: Larcier.
   Google Scholar
• Valcke, P. (2011). Looking for the user in media pluralism: Unravelling the traditional diversity chain and recent trends of user empowerment in European media regulation. Journal of Information Policy, 1, 287–320. doi: 10.5325/jinfopoli.1.2011.0287
   Google Scholar
• van der Sloot, B. (2012). Walking a thin line: The regulation of EPGs. Jipitec, 2, 138–147.
   Google Scholar
• Vargas, S., & Castells, P. (2011). Rank and relevance in novelty and diversity metrics for recommender systems. Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J. (2010). User information regimes: How social media shape patterns of consumption. North Western University Law Review, 104, 593–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenman, M. (2013). Agonistic democracy. Constituent power in the era of globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., & Hurley, N. (2008). Avoiding monotony: Improving the diversity of recommendation lists. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, 2008, 123–130. doi: 10.1145/1454008.1454030
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, T., Kuscsik, Z., Liu, J.-G., Medo, M., Wakeling, J. R., & Zhang, Y.-C. (2010). Solving the apparent diversity-accuracy dilemma of recommender systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 4511–4515. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000488107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar