Let’s be careful out there … : how digital rights advocates educate citizens in the digital age

References

• Antonova, S. (2013). Internet and the emerging global community of rights: The human-rights debate at the internet governance forum. Journal of Philosophy of International Law, 4(1), 84–98.
   Google Scholar
• Benedek, W. (2008). Internet governance and human rights. In W. Benedek, V. Bauer, & M. C. Kettemann (Eds.), Internet governance and the information society (pp. 31–50). The Hauge: Eleven International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y., Roberts, H., Faris, R., Solow-Niederman, A., & Etling, B. (2013). Social mobilization and the networked public sphere: Mapping the SOPA-PIPA debate. Cambridge, MA: Berkman Center Research Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. (2008). The privacy advocates: Resisting the spread of surveillance. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, J. M. (1999). The new liberalism: The rising power of citizen groups. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Breindl, Y. (2011). Promoting openness by ‘patching’ European directives: Internet-based campaigning during the EU telecoms package reform. Journal of Information, Technology and Politics, 8(3), 346–366. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2011.595326
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese, A. (2004). The promise of civil society: A global movement for communication rights. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 18(3), 317–329. doi: 10.1080/1030431042000256081
   Google Scholar
• Can’t Stop The Serenity. (2016). The history of can’t stop the serenity. Retrieved from http://www.cantstoptheserenity.com/about/history-2/
   Google Scholar
• Carothers, T. (2000). Civil society. Foreign Policy, 117, 8–29. doi: 10.2307/1149558
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, W. K., & Hackett, R. A. (2006). Democratic media activism through the lens of social movement theory. Media, Culture & Society, 28(1), 83–104. doi: 10.1177/0163443706059289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2008). The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 78–93. doi: 10.1177/0002716207311877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, J., Keum, H., & Shah, D. V. (2015). News consumers, opinion leaders, and citizen consumers: Moderators of the consumption-participation link. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(1), 161–178. doi: 10.1177/1077699014554766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, L. (2013). The ironic spectator: Solidarity in the age of post-humanitarianism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diani, M. (2000). Social movement networks virtual and real. Information, Communication & Society, 3(3), 386–401. doi: 10.1080/13691180051033333
   Google Scholar
• Falaschetti, D. (2003). Can latent groups influence policy decisions? The case of telecommunications policy. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 19(1), 83–105. doi: 10.1093/jleo/19.1.83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, M. W., & Edwards, B. (1996). The paradox of civil society. Journal of Democracy, 7(3), 38–52. doi: 10.1353/jod.1996.0048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghodeswar, B. M. (2008). Building brand identity in competitive markets: A conceptual model. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 17(1), 4–12. doi: 10.1108/10610420810856468
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. Nowell Smith, Trans.). New York, NY: International.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, G. (2014). No place to hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the US surveillance state. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Guimary, D. L. (1975). Citizens’ groups and broadcasting. New York, NY: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Harlow, S., & Guo, L. (2014). Will the revolution be tweeted or Facebooked? Using digital communication tools in immigrant activism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 463–478. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartz, L. (1955/1991). The liberal tradition in America: An interpretation of American political thought since the revolution. San Diego, CA: Harcourt, Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Hermann, T., Heller, E., Cohen, C., Be'ery, G., & Lebel, Y. (2015). The Israeli Democracy Index 2014. Jerusalem: The Israel Democracy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hinck, A. (2012). Theorizing a public engagement keystone: Seeing fandom’s integral connection to civic engagement through the case of the Harry Potter Alliance. Transformative Works & Cultures, 10. doi: 10.3983/twc.2012.0311
   Google Scholar
• Hintz, A. (2009). Civil Society Media and global governance: Intervening into the World Summit of the Information Society. Münster: Lit.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, R. (2010). Digital and media literacy: A plan of action. A White Paper on the digital and media literacy recommendations of the Knight Commission on the information needs of communities in a democracy. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute. Retrieved from http://www.knightcomm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Digital_and_Media_Literacy_A_Plan_of_Action.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Holpuch, A. (2014, June 3). John Oliver’s cheeky net neutrality plea crashes FCC website. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/03/john-oliver-fcc-website-net-neutrality
   Google Scholar
• Hook, N., & Brake, M. (2009). Science in popular culture. In M. L. Brake & E. Weitkamp (Eds.), Introducing science communication (pp. 37–38). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, E. (2014, September 17). 3.7 million comments later: Here’s where net neutrality stands. NPR. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2014/09/17/349243335/3-7-million-comments-later-heres-where-net-neutrality-stands]
   Google Scholar
• Internet Rights and Principles Coalition. (2014). The Internet Rights and Principles Coalition Charter. Retrieved from http://internetrightsandprinciples.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/IRPC_Booklet-English_4thedition.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kaldor, M. (2003). The idea of global civil society. International Affairs, 79, 583–593. doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.00324
   Google Scholar
• Karpf, D. (2010). Online political mobilization from the advocacy group’s perspective: Looking beyond clicktivism. Policy & Internet, 2(4), 7–41. doi: 10.2202/1944-2866.1098
   Google Scholar
• Keane, J. (2003). Global civil society? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1999). Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics. International Social Science Journal, 51, 89–101. doi: 10.1111/1468-2451.00179
   Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B., & Oegema, D. (1987). Potentials, networks, motivations, and barriers: Steps towards participation in social movements. American Sociological Review, 52(4), 519–531. doi: 10.2307/2095297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, N. (1999). No logo. New York, NY: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Kulesza, J. (2008). Freedom of information in the global information society – the question of The Internet Bill of Rights. UWM Law Review, 1, 81–95. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1446771
   Google Scholar
• Kylander, N., & Stone, S. (2012). The role of brand in the nonprofit sector. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Retrieved from http://ssir.org/articles/entry/the_role_of_brand_in_the_nonprofit_sector
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. K. M., & Barton, D. (2011). Constructing glocal identities through multilingual writing practices on Flickr.com®. International Multilingual Research Journal, 5, 39–59. doi: 10.1080/19313152.2011.541331
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2008). Internet literacy: Young people’s negotiation of new online opportunities. In T. McPherson (Ed.), Digital youth, innovation, and the unexpected (pp. 101–122). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., Bober, M., & Helsper, E. J. (2005). Internet literacy among children and young people: Findings from the UK Children Go Online Project. London: LSE. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/397/1/UKCGOonlineLiteracy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Löblich, M., & Wendelin, M. (2012). ICT policy activism on a national level: Ideas, resources and strategies of German civil society in governance processes. New Media & Society, 14(6), 899–915. doi: 10.1177/1461444811432427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackay, H. (1992). From computer literacy to technology literacy. In J. Beynon & H. Mackay (Eds.), Technological literacy & the curriculum (pp. 125–147). London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monroe, E. P. (2015). Free expression, globalism and the new strategic communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, K. (1989). Target: Prime time: Advocacy groups and the struggle over entertainment television. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, M., Pagé, C., & Kuerbis, B. (2004). Civil society and the shaping of communication-information policy: Four decades of advocacy. The Information Society, 20, 169–185. doi: 10.1080/01972240490456845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2002). Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing political activism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, P. (1984). If you don’t do it, nobody else will: Active and token contributors to local collective action. American Sociological Review, 49, 601–610. doi: 10.2307/2095418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osenga, K. J. (2013). The internet is not a super highway: Using metaphors to communicate information and communications policy. Journal of Information Policy, 3, 30–54. doi: 10.5325/jinfopoli.3.2013.0030
   Google Scholar
• Panigrahi, S. (2016, February 9). A good day for the internet everywhere: India bans differential data pricing. Global Voices. Retrieved from https://globalvoices.org/2016/02/09/a-good-day-for-the-internet-everywhere-india-bans-differential-data-pricing/
   Google Scholar
• Pelczynski, Z. A. (1988). Solidarity and ‘the rebirth of civil society’. In J. W. Harbeson (Ed.), Civil society and the state (pp. 361–380). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Pickard, V. (2015). America’s battle for media democracy: The triumph of corporate libertarianism and the future of media reform. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Postigo, H. (2008). Capturing fair use for the Youtube generation: The Digital Rights Movement, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and the user-centered framing of fair use. Information, Communication & Society, 11(7), 1008–1027. doi: 10.1080/13691180802109071
   Google Scholar
• Raboy, M., & Landry, N. (2005). Civil society, communication and global governance: Issues from the World Summit on the Information Society. New York, NY: Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, R. A. (2003). First sale doctrine in the era of digital networks. The BCL Review, 44, 577–652.
   Google Scholar
• Ribak, R., & Turow, J. (2003). Internet power and social context: A globalization approach to web privacy concerns. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47(3), 328–349. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4703_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity–heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities (pp. 25–44). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Siochrú, S. Ó. (2004). Civil society participation in the WSIS process: Promises and reality. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 18(3), 330–344. doi: 10.1080/1030431042000256090
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, S., & Pendleton, M. S. (1983). Feminism and the FCC. In J. J. Havick (Ed.), Communications policy and the political process (pp. 127–147). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Strømsnes, K. (2009). Political consumerism: A substitute for or supplement to conventional political participation? Journal of Civil Society, 5(3), 303–314. doi: 10.1080/17448680903351834
   Google Scholar
• Tăbușcă, S. M. (2010). The internet access as a fundamental right. Journal of Information Systems and Operations Management, 4(2), 206–212.
   Google Scholar
• Turow, J., Feldman, L., & Meltzer, K. (2005). Open to exploitation: American shoppers online and offline. Philadelphia: The Annenberg Public Policy Center – University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, B. (2011). Freedom of expression on the internet: Implications for foreign policy. Global Information Society Watch. Retrieved from http://giswatch.org/en/freedom-expression/freedom-expression-internet-implications-foreign-policy
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, E. J., & Warland, R. H. (1983). Social movement involvement in the wake of nuclear accident: Activists and free riders in the TMI area. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 764–781. doi: 10.2307/2095324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wappner, P. K. (1996). Environmental activism and world civic politics. New York: State university of New York press.
   Google Scholar
• Weilbacher, W. M. (1995). Brand marketing. Chicago, IL: NTC Business Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, T. (2003). Network neutrality, broadband discrimination. Journal on Telecom and High Tech Law, 2, 142–176.
   Google Scholar
• Yair, G. (2011). The code of Israeliness: The ten commandments for the 21st century. Jerusalem: Keter.
   Google Scholar