When digital natives instruct digital immigrants: active guidance of parental media use by children and conflict in the family

References

• Ambert, A. M. (2001). The effect of children on parents (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Haworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, E. W. (1993). Exploring the effects of active parental mediation of television content. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 37, 147–158. doi: 10.1080/08838159309364212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, S. E., & Talpade, S. (1994). Adolescent influence in family decision making: A replication with extension. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 332–341. doi: 10.1086/209401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R. Q. (1968). A reinterpretation of the direction of effects in studies of socialization. Psychological Review, 75, 81–95. doi: 10.1037/h0025583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, S., & Lee, T. (2011). Toward predicting youth resistance to internet risk prevention strategies. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55, 90–113. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2011.546255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, L.S. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 21, 323–343. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01391.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Common Sense Media. (2013). Zero to eight: Childrens media use in America, a common sense media research study. Retrieved from https://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/zero-to-eight-childrens-media-use-in-america-2013
   Google Scholar
• Correa, T. (2012). Bottom-up technology transmission within families: How children influence their parents in the adoption and use of digital media (Dissertation). Retrieved from https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/22115/CORREADISSERTATION-2012.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Correa, T. (2014). Bottom-up technology transmission within families: Exploring how youths influence their parents’ digital media use with dyadic data. Journal of Communication, 64, 103–124. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa, T., Straubhaar, J. D., Spence, J., & Chen, W. (2015). Brokering new technologies: The role of children in their parents’ usage of the internet. New Media & Society, 17, 483–500. doi: 10.1177/1461444813506975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouter, A. C., & Booth, A. (2003). Children’s influence on family dynamics. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• De Mol, J., & Buysse, A. (2008a). The phenomenology of children’s influence on parents. Journal of Family Therapy, 30, 163–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6427.2008.00424.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Mol, J., & Buysse, A. (2008b). Understandings of children’s influence in parent-child relationships: A Q-methodological study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 359–379. doi: 10.1177/0265407507087963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Mol, J., Lemmens, G., Verhofstadt, L., & Kuczynski, L. (2013). Intergenerational transmission in a bidirectional context. Psychologica Belgica, 53, 7–23. doi: 10.5334/pb-53-3-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• d’Haenens, L., & Vandoninck, S. (2012). Kids online: Kansen en risico’s van kinderen en jongeren op het internet. Gent: Academia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, A. R. (1992). Conflicts between mothers and their young children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38, 21–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Family Online Safety Institute. (2012). The online generation gap. Contrasting attitudes and behaviors of parents and teens. Hart Research Associates. Retrieved from http://safekids.com/pdfs/fosireport2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gentile, D. A., Nathanson, A. I., Rasmussen, E. E., Reimer, R. A., & Walsh, D. A. (2012). Do you see what I see? Parent and child reports of parental monitoring of media. Family Relations, 61, 470–487. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00709.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götze, E., Prange, C., & Uhrovska, I. (2009). Childrens impact on innovation decision making: A diary study. European Journal of Marketing, 43(2), 264–295. doi: 10.1108/03090560910923328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, S. L., & Valentine, G. (2002). Cyberkids? Exploring children’s identities and social networks in on-line and off-line worlds. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92, 302–319. doi: 10.1111/1467-8306.00292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R., & Hans, J. (2001). Computers, the internet, and families: A review of the role new technology plays in family life. Journal of Family Issues, 22, 776–790. doi: 10.1177/019251301022006006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P. G., … Tripp, L. (2009). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the digital youth project. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, V. S. (2010). How children of immigrants use media to connect their families to the community. Journal of Children and Media, 4, 298–315. doi: 10.1080/17482798.2010.486136
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kiesler, S., Zdaniuk, B., Lundmark, V., & Kraut, R. (2000). Troubles with the internet: The dynamics of help at home. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 323–351. doi: 10.1207/S15327051HCI1504_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koolstra, C. M., & Lucassen, N. (2004). Viewing behavior of children and TV guidance by parents: A comparison of parent and child reports. Communications, 29, 179–198. doi: 10.1515/comm.2004.012
   Google Scholar
• Kuczynski, L., & De Mol, J. (2015). Dialectical models of socialization. In W. F. Overton & P. C. M. Molenaar (Eds.), Theory and method. Volume 1 of the handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp. 326–368). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kuczynski, L., & De Mol, J. (2015). Dialectical models of socialization. In W. F. Overton, & P. C. M. Molenaar (Eds.), Theory and method. Volume 1 of the handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp. 326–368). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kuczynski, L. (2003). Beyond bidirectionality: Bilateral conceptual frameworks for understanding dynamics in parent-child relations. In L. Kuczynski (Ed.), Handbook of dynamics in parent-child relations (pp. 1–24). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Kuczynski, L., & Navara, G. S. (2006). Sources of innovation and change in socialization, internalization and acculturation. In M. Killen & J. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 299–327). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kundanis, R. M. (2003). Children, teens, families, and mass media. The millennial generation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, B., Coy, K. C., & Collins, W. A. (1998). Reconsidering changes in parent-child conflict across adolescence: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 69, 817–832. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.00817.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2009). Youthful experts. In S. Livinstone (Ed.), Children and the internet (pp. 33–62). Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lollis, S., & Kuczynski, L. (1997). Beyond one hand clapping: Seeing bidirectionality in parent-child relations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 441–461. doi: 10.1177/0265407597144002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maccoby, E. E. (2003). Dynamic viewpoints on parent-child relations – their implications for socialization processes. In L. Kuczynski (Ed.), Handbook of dynamics in parent-child relations (pp. 439–452). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 4: Socialization, personality, and social development (pp. 1–101). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• McDevitt, M., & Chaffee, S. (2002). From top-down to trickle-up influence: Revisiting assumptions about the family in political socialization. Political Communication, 19, 281–301. doi: 10.1080/01957470290055501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesch, G. S. (2006). Family characteristics and intergenerational conflicts over the internet. Information, Communication & Society, 9, 473–495. doi: 10.1080/13691180600858705
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, V. (2003). Perspectives on children's agency within families: A view from the sociology of childhood. In L. Kuczynski (Ed.), Handbook of dynamics in parent-child relations (pp. 109–129). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. (2006). Parental mediation of children’s videogame playing: A comparison of the reports by parents and children. Learning, Media, and Technology, 31, 181–202. doi: 10.1080/17439880600756803
   Google Scholar
• Nikken, P., & Schols, M. (2015). How and why parents guide the media use of young children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(11), 3423–3435. doi: 10.1007/s10826-015-0144-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oblinger, D. G., & Oblinger, J. L. (2005). Educating the net generation. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/research-and-publications/books/educating-net-generation
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, G. S., & Lollis, S. (1997). Introduction to special issue: Reciprocity and bidirectionality in parent-child relationships: New approaches to the study of enduring issues. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 435–440. doi: 10.1177/0265407597144001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. Part 1. On the Horizon, 9, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Rheingold, H. L. (1969). The social and socializing infant. In D. A.Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 779–790). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Ribak, R. (2001). ‘Like immigrants’: negotiating power in the face of the home computer. New Media and Society, 3, 220–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roloff, M. E., & Miller, C. W. (2006). Mulling about family conflict and communication: What we know and what we need to know. In L. H. Turner & R. West (Eds.), The family communication sourcebook (pp. 143–164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, C., & Nichols, J. (1983). The next-birthday method of respondent selection. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 270–276. doi: 10.1086/268785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sameroff, A. (1975). Transactional models in early social relations. Human Development, 18, 65–70. doi: 10.1159/000271476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaan, V. K., & Melzer, A. (2015). Parental mediation of children’s television and video game use in Germany: Active and embedded in family processes. Journal of Children and Media, 9, 58–76. doi: 10.1080/17482798.2015.997108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2004). Exploring the role of children in adults’ adoption and use of computers. Information Technology & People, 17, 53–70. doi: 10.1108/09593840410522170
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2009). The digital native myth and reality. New Information Perspectives, 61, 364–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tambling, R. B., Johnson, S. K., & Johnson, L. N. (2011). Analyzing dyadic data from small samples: A pooled regression actor-partner interdependence model approach. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, 2, 101–114. doi: 10.1177/2150137811422901
   Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P. M., Krcmar, M., Peeters, A. L., & Marseille, N. M. (1999). Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: ‘Instructive mediation’, ‘restrictive mediation’, and ‘social coviewing’. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43, 52–66. doi: 10.1080/08838159909364474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bergh, B. (1998). Kindbeeld in context: Wisselwerking tussen de maatschappelijke en wetenschappelijke benadering van kinderen. Ethiek & Maatschappij, 1, 92–115. (in Dutch).
   Google Scholar
• Van den Bulck, J., Custers, K., & Nelissen, S. (2016). The child-effect in the new media environment: Challenges and opportunities for communication research. Journal of Children and Media, 10, 30–38. doi: 10.1080/17482798.2015.1121897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bulck, J., & Van den Bergh, B. (2005). Chapter 2: The child effect in media and communication research: A call to arms and an agenda for Research. Communication Yearbook, 29, 35–47. doi: 10.1207/s15567419cy2901_2
   Google Scholar
• Van den Bulck, J., & Van den Bergh, B. (2000). Parental guidance of children’s media use and conflict in the family. In B.Van den Bergh & J.Van den Bulck (Eds.), Children and media (pp. 131–150). Leuven: Garant.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rompaey, V., Roe, K., & Struys, K. (2002). Children’s influence on internet access at home: Adoption and use in the family context. Information, Communication & Society, 5, 189–206. doi: 10.1080/13691180210130770
   Google Scholar
• Watt, D., & White, J. M. (1999). Computers and the family life: A family development perspective. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 30, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar