#Engagement: use of Twitter chats to construct nominal participatory spaces during health crises

References

• Adams, A., & McCorkindale, T. (2013). Dialogue and transparency: A content analysis of how the 2012 presidential candidates used twitter. Public Relations Review, 39, 357–359. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agresti, A. (2007). An introduction to categorical data analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Avidar, R., Ariel, Y., Malka, V., & Levy, E. C. (2015). Smartphones, publics, and OPR: Do publics want to engage? Public Relations Review, 41, 214–221. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.11.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, J. (2015). What do scientists think about the public and does it matter to their online engagement? Science and Public Policy, 42, 201–214. doi:10.1093/scipol/scu042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodmer, W. (1985). The public understanding of science. London: Royal Society.
   Google Scholar
• Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 524–538. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulos, K., & Wheeler, S. (2007). The emerging web 2.0 social software: An enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and healthcare education. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 24, 35–54. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2007.00701.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, R.-Y. R., & Fu, J. S. (2016). How to be heard on microblogs? Nonprofit organizations’ follower networks and post features for information diffusion in China. Information, Communication & Society, 19, 978–993. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1086013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, S., & Firmstone, J. (2014). Contested meanings of public engagement: Exploring discourse and practice within a British city council. Media, Culture, & Society, 36, 826–844. doi:10.1177/0163443714536074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, S. (2013, September 30). The ultimate guide to hosting a tweet chat. Forbes. Retrieved from  http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevecooper/2013/09/30/the-ultimate-guide-to-hosting-a-tweet-chat/
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, G., Gosling, V., Bagnall, G., & Light, B. (2014). Is there an app for that? A case study of the potentials and limitations of the participatory turn and networked publics for classical music audience engagement. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 1072–1085. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.877953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, S. (2014, November 4). Mixed messages on Ebola lead to mistrust. Orange County Register. Retrieved from http://www.ocregister.com/articles/ebola-640710-don-sparks.html
   Google Scholar
• Dalrymple, K. E., Young, R., & Tully, M. (2016). “Facts, not fear”: Negotiating uncertainty on social media during the 2014 Ebola crisis. Science Communication, 38, 442–467. doi: 10.1177/1075547016655546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, F. (2006). Mobile phone masts: Protesting the scientific evidence. Public Understanding of Science, 15(4), 387–410. doi: 10.1177/0963662506057246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dredze, M., Broniatowski, D. A., & Hilyard, K. M. (2016). Zika vaccine misconceptions: A social media analysis. Vaccine, 24, 3441–3442. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudo, A., & Besley, J. (2016). Scientists’ prioritization of communication objectives for public engagement. PLoS ONE, 11(2). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durant, J. (1999). Participatory technology assessment and the democratic model of the public understanding of science. Science and Public Policy, 26(5), 313–319. doi: 10.3152/147154399781782329
   Google Scholar
• Firmstone, J., & Coleman, S. (2015). Public engagement in local government: The voice and influence of citizens in online communicative spaces. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 680–695. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.986180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12, 436–445. doi: 10.2307/798843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Ito, M., & boyd, d. (2016). Participatory culture in a networked era: A conversation on youth, learning, commerce, and politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. M. (2014). Americans’ ratings of CDC down after Ebola crisis. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/179522/americans-ratings-cdc-down-ebola-crisis.aspx?utm_source=ebola&utm_medium=search&utm_campaign=tiles
   Google Scholar
• Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (1998). Building dialogic relationships through the World Wide web. Public Relations Review, 24, 321–334. doi: 10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80143-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 28, 21–37. doi: 10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00108-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazard, A. J., Scheinfeld, E., Bernhardt, J. M., Wilcox, G. B., & Suran, M. (2015). Detecting themes of public concern: A text mining analysis of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Ebola live Twitter chat. American Journal of Infection Control, 43, 1109–1111. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.05.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. M. (2014, October 12). CDC, Ebola & Tweet Chats: Was this venue a success? Symplur. Retrieved from http://www.symplur.com/blog/cdc-ebola-tweet-chats-success/
   Google Scholar
• Megele, C. (2014). Theorizing twitter chat. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 2(2), 46–51. doi: 10.14297/jpaap.v2i2.106
   Google Scholar
• Meraz, S., & Papacharissi, Z. (2013). Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18, 138–166. doi:10.1177/1940161212474472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D., & Kimmel, L. G. (2001). Biomedical communications: Purposes, audiences, and strategies. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D., Pardo, R., & Niwa, F. (1997). Public perceptions of science and technology: A comparative study of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada. Madrid: BBV Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Paek, H.-J., Hove, T., Jung, Y., & Cole, R. T. (2013). Engagement across three social media platforms: An exploratory study of a cause-related PR campaign. Public Relations Review, 39, 526–533. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, B., & Seeger, M. W. (2005). Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model. Journal of Health Communication, 10, 43–55. doi:10.1080/10810730590904571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. (2014). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sandman, P. M. (1987). Risk communication: Facing public outrage. EPA Journal, 13, 21–22.
   Google Scholar
• Seeger, M. W., Reynolds, B., & Sellnow, T. L. (2009). Crisis and emergency risk communication in health contexts: Applying the CDC model to pandemic influenza. In R. L. Heath & D. H. O’Hair (Eds.), Handbook of risk and crisis communication (pp. 302–322). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe, D. (2015). Your chi-square test is statistically significant: now what? Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 20(8). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=20&n=8
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. G., & Gallicano, T. D. (2015). Terms of engagement: Analyzing public engagement with organizations through social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 82–90. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M., & Kent, M. L. (2014). Dialogic engagement: Clarifying foundational concepts. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26, 384–398. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2014.956106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, R. D., & Williams, J. M. (2011). Squawking, tweeting, cooing, and hooting: Analyzing the communication patterns of government agencies on twitter. Journal of Public Affairs, 11(4), 353–363. doi:10.1002/pa.385
   Google Scholar
• Wigley, S., & Lewis, B. K. (2012). Rules of engagement: Practice what you tweet. Public Relations Review, 38, 165–167. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.08.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar