‘Show me the money and the party!’ – variation in Facebook and Twitter adoption by politicians

References

• Aldrich, J. H. (1995). Why parties? The origins and transformation of party politics in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, J. R., & Hibbing, J. R. (2007). Personal, interpersonal, and political temperaments. Annals of American Academic, Political, and Social Sciences, 614, 196–212. doi: 10.1177/0002716207305621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, J. C., & Morris, J. S. (2010). My FaceTube politics: Social networking websites and political engagement of young adults. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 24–44. doi: 10.1177/0894439309334325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bimber, B. (2014). Digital media in the Obama campaigns of 2008 and 2012: Adaptation to the personalized political communication environment. Journal of Information, Technology & Politics, 11(2), 130–150. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2014.895691
   Google Scholar
• Broersma, M., & Graham, T. (2016). Tipping the balance of power: Social media and the transformation of political journalism. In A. Bruns, G. S. Enli, & E. Skogerbo (Eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 89–103). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Busemann, K. (2013). Wer nutzt was im social web? Media Perspektiven, 7–8, 391–398.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, B. A., Kenski, K., & Wang, D. (2013). Twitter use by presidential primary candidates during the 2012 campaign. American Behavioural Scientist, 57(11), 1596–1610. doi: 10.1177/0002764213489014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa, T., Willard-Hinsley, A., & Zuniga, H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the web? The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behaviour, 26, 247–253. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolezal, M. (2015). Online campaigning by Austrian political candidates: Determinants of using personal websites, Facebook, and Twitter. Policy and Internet, 7(1), 103–119. doi: 10.1002/poi3.83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Rowe.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, M. (2015). Mobile messaging and social media 2015. Washington, DC: Pew Research Centre. Retrieved August 6, 2015, from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/19/mobile-messaging-and-social-media-2015/
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, M., Ellison, N., Lampe, C., Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2015). Social media update 2014. Washington, DC: Pew Research Centre. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/09/social-media-update-2014/
   Google Scholar
• Enli, G. S., & Naper, A. A. (2016). Social media incumbent advantage: Barack Obama’s and Mitt Romney’s Tweets in the 2012 U.S. Presidential election campaign. In A. Bruns, G. S. Enli, E. Skogerbo, A. O. Larsson, & C. Christensen (Eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 364–377). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Enli, G. S., & Skogerbo, E. (2013). Personalized campaigns in party-centered politics. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 757–774. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• vor dem Esche, J., & Henning-Thurau, T. (2014). German digitalization consumer report 2014 (No. 2). Munster, DE: Digitalization Think Lab: Roland Berger Strategy Consultants. Retrieved June 20, 2015, from http://www.rolandberger.de/media/pdf/Roland_Berger_German_Digitalization_Consumer_Report_20140718.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Facebook. (2014, September 30). Company mission. Retrieved January 21, 2015, from http://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, D., & Schmitt-Beck, R. (Eds.). (2002). Do political campaigns matter? Campaign effects in elections & referendums. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., Dowling, C. M., & Ha, S. (2010). Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Science Review, 104, 111–133. doi: 10.1017/S0003055410000031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, R., & McAllister, I. (2011). Do online election campaigns win votes? The 2007 Australian ‘YouTube’ election. Political Communication, 28(2), 227–244. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2011.568042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, R., & McAllister, I. (2015). Normalising and equalising party competition? Assessing the impact of the web on election campaigning. Political Studies, 63(3), 111–133. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, R., & Ward, S. (1998). UK political parties and the Internet: Politics as usual in the new media? International Journal of Press/Politics, 3(3), 14–38. doi: 10.1177/1081180X98003003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfried, J., & Shearer, E. (2016). News use across social media platforms 2016. Washington, DC: Pew Research Centre. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/
   Google Scholar
• Gscheidle, C., & Gerhard, H. (2013). Berichterstattung zur Bundestagswahl 2013 aus Sicht der Zuschauer. Media Perspektiven, 12, 558–573.
   Google Scholar
• Gulati, G. J., & Williams, C. B. (2013). Social media and campaign 2012: Developments and trends for Facebook adoption. Social Science Computer Review, 31(5), 577–588. doi: 10.1177/0894439313489258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harfoush, R. (2009). Yes we did: An inside look at how social media built the Obama brand. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
   Google Scholar
• Hasebrink, U., & Hölig, S. (2013). Lagging behind or choosing a different path: Information behavior in Germany. In D. Levy & N. Newman (Eds.), Reuters institute digital news report 2013 (pp. 81–83). Oxford: University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, D., Rowe, J., Batey, M., & Lee, A. (2012). A tale of two sites: Twitter vs Facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage. Computers in Human Behaviour, 28(2), 561–569. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A., Jürgens, P., & Schoen, H. (2012). Why the pirate party won the German election of 2009 or the trouble with predictions: A response to Tumasjan, A. et al. Social Science Computer Review, 30(2), 229–234. doi: 10.1177/0894439311404119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaczmirek, L., Mayr, P., Vatrapu, R., Bleier, A., Blumenberg, M., Gummer, T., & Wolf, C. (2014). Social Media monitoring of the campaigns for the 2013 German Bundestag elections on Facebook and Twitter. GESIS Working Paper 31. Köln, DE. Retrieved from http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/38195
   Google Scholar
• Klinger, U. (2013). Mastering the art of social media. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 717–736. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.782329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. O. (2015). Going viral? Comparing parties on social media during the 2014 Swedish election. Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies, 12, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. O. (2016). Online, all the time? A quantitative assessment of the permanent campaign on Facebook. New Media and Society, 18(2), 274–292. doi: 10.1177/1461444814538798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. O., & Kalsnes, B. (2014). ‘Of course we are on Facebook’: Use and non-use of social media among Swedish and Norwegian politicians. European Journal of Communication, 29(6), 653–667, OnlineFirst. doi: 10.1177/0267323114531383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. O., & Moe, H. (2012). Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign. New Media and Society, 14(5), 729–747. doi: 10.1177/1461444811422894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. O., & Moe, H. (2014). Triumph of the Underdogs? Comparing Twitter use by political actors during two Norwegian election campaigns. SAGE Open.
   Google Scholar
• Lassen, D. S., & Brown, A. R. (2010). Twitter: The electoral connection. Social Science Computer Review, 23, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P.T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuernbergk, C., Wladarsch, J., Neubarth, J., & Neuberger, C. (2016). Social media use in the German election campaign 2013. In A. Bruns, G. S. Enli, E. Skogerbo, A. O. Larsson, & C. Christensen, (Eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 419–433). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Panek, E. T., Nardis, Y., & Konrath, S. (2013). Mirror or Megaphone? How relationships between narcissism and social networking site use differ on Facebook and Twitter. Computers in Human Behaviour, 29, 2004–2012. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poushter, J. (2016). Smartphone ownership and internet usage continues to climb in emerging economies. Pew Research Centre. Retrieved October 17, 2016, from http://www.pewglobal.org/files/2016/02/pew_research_center_global_technology_report_final_february_22__2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the big five inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 203–212. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattinger, H., Roteutscher, S., Schmitt-Beck, R., Weels, B., & Wolf, C. (2014). Candidate campaign survey 2013 (GLES) data file version 3.0. Retrieved 16 March 2015, from http://www.gesis.org/en/elections-home/gles/data-and-documents/data/
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, C., Orr, E., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J., Simmering, M. G., & Orr, R. R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behaviour, 25(2), 578–586. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shephard, M., & Quinlan, S. (2016). Social media and the Scottish independence referendum 2014: Events and the generation of enthusiasm for yes. In A. Bruns, G. S. Enli, E. Skogerbo, A. O. Larsson, & C. Christensen (Eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 488–502). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Skogerbo, E., Bruns, A., Quodling, A., & Ingebretsen, T. (2016). Agenda-setting revisited: Social media and sourcing in mainstream journalism. In A. Bruns, G. S. Enli, E. Skogerbo, A. O. Larsson, & C. Christensen (Eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 104–120). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Skovsgaard, M., & Van Dalen, A. (2013). Social media in the campaign mix during the 2011 Danish elections. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 737–756. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.783876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Štětka, V., Lilleker, D., Tenscher, J., & Jalali, C. (2014). Professional campaigning online: The role of new media as campaign platforms. Presented at the ECPR General Conference, Glasgow, UK. Retrieved June 16, 2015, from http://ecpr.eu/filestore/paperproposal/0efb0c25-1e10-469c-ac50-2898eccc2848.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Strüker, J., & Gille, D. (2010). RFID adoption and the role of organisational size. Business Process Management Journal, 16(6), 972–990. doi: 10.1108/14637151011093026
   Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., Lance, J. R., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. (2010). Predicting elections with Twitter. In Proceedings of the fourth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media. Retrieved from http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM10/paper/viewFile/1441/1852
   Google Scholar
• Twitter. (2015). Twitter – about. Retrieved June 22, 2015, from https://about.twitter.com/company
   Google Scholar
• Vergeer, M., & Hermans, L. (2013). Campaigning on Twitter: Microblogging and online social networking as campaign tools in the 2010 general elections in the Netherlands. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 18, 399–419. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergeer, M., Hermans, L., & Sams, S. (2011). Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning: The exploration of a new campaign tool and a new campaign style. Party Politics, 19(3), 477–501. doi: 10.1177/1354068811407580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C. B., & Gulati, G. J. (2007). Social networks in political campaigns: Facebook and the 2006 midterm elections. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. B., & Gulati, G. J. (2009). Social networks in political campaigns: Facebook and congressional elections 2006, 2008. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. B., & Gulati, G. J. (2013). Social networks in political campaigns: Facebook and congressional elections of 2006 and 2008. New Media and Society, 15(1), 52–71. doi: 10.1177/1461444812457332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, S. L., & Swait, J. (2002). Psychological indicators of innovation adoption: Cross-classification based on need for cognition and need for change. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12, 1–13. doi: 10.1207/S15327663JCP1201_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zittel, T. (2009). Lost in technology? Political parties and the online campaigns of constituency candidates in Germany’s mixed member electoral system. Journal of Information, Technology & Politics, 6(3–4), 298–311. doi: 10.1080/19331680903048832
   Google Scholar