The politics of the Digital Single Market: culture vs. competition vs. copyright

References

• Barnett, J. (2014). Copyright without creators. Review of Law and Economics, 9(3), 389–438. doi: 10.1515/rle-2013-0019
   Google Scholar
• Boldrin, M., & Levine, D. (2008). Against intellectual monopoly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capoccia, G., & Kelemen, R. (2007). The study of critical junctures: Theory, narrative, and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism. World Politics, 59(03), 341–369. doi: 10.1017/S0043887100020852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CISAC v. European Commission (Case T-442/08). O.J. C. 156/37.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, C. (2015). Kobalt-owned collecting society announces global deal with Apple Music. Complete Music Update. Retrieved from http://www.completemusicupdate.com/article/kobalt-owned-collecting-society-announces-global-deal-with-apple-music/
   Google Scholar
• Drexl, J., Nérisson, S., & Trumpke, F. (2013). Comments of the Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law on the proposal for a directive of the European parliament and of the council on collective management of copyright and related rights and multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online uses in the internal market COM (2012)372. IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 3, 263–292.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2005). Study on a community initiative on the cross-border collective management of copyright. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/management/study-collectivemgmt_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2008). Commission decision of 16.07.2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/C2/38.698 – CISAC). O.J.C. 323/12.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2014). Directive 2014/26/EU of the European parliament and the council on collective management of copyright and related rights and multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online use in the internal market. Official Journal of European Union, L84/72.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2015). Digital single market. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/priorities/digital-single-market/
   Google Scholar
• Ficsor, M. (2002). Collective management of copyright and related rights (WIPO report). Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, S., & Marshall, L. (Eds.) (2004). Music and copyright. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, S. (1988). Copyright and the music business. Popular Music, 7(01), 57–76. doi: 10.1017/S0261143000002531
   Google Scholar
• Galuszka, P. (2015). Music aggregators and intermediation of the digital music market. International Journal of Communication, 9, 254–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GEMA. (2013). Jahrbuch 2013. Berlin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Graber, C. (2012). Collective rights management, competition policy and cultural diversity: EU law making at a crossroads (i-call working paper, No. 2012/04).
   Google Scholar
• Guibault, L., & Van Gompel, S. (2015). Collective management in the European Union. In Daniel Gervais (Ed.), Collective management of copyright and related rights (3rd ed., pp. 139–174). Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Haggart, B. (2014). Copyfight – the global politics of digital copyright reform. London: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., & Taylor, R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handke, C., & Towse, R. (2007). Economics of copyright collecting societies. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 38, 937–957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haunss, S. (2013). The changing role of collecting societies in the internet. Internet Policy Review, 2, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Höffner, E. (2010). Geschichte und Wesen des Urheberrechts (Vol. 1). München: Verlag Europäische Wirtschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Karp, H. (2014). Warner music group signs deal to license music to soundcloud. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/warner-music-group-nears-deal-to-license-music-to-soundcloud-1415127425
   Google Scholar
• Katz, A. (2006). The potential demise of another natural monopoly: New technologies and the administration of performing rights. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 2(2), 245–284. doi: 10.1093/joclec/nhl010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kretschmer, M., Klimis, G., & Wallis, R. (1999). The changing location of intellectual property rights in music: A study of music publishers, collecting societies and media conglomerates. Prometheus, 17(2), 163–186. doi: 10.1080/08109029908629548
   Google Scholar
• Kretschmer, M. (2003). Digital copyright: The end of an era. European Intellectual Property Review, 25, 333–341.
   Google Scholar
• Kretschmer, M. (2005a). Access and reward in the information society: Regulating the collective management of copyright. Poole: Centre for Intellectual Property Policy & Management.
   Google Scholar
• Kretschmer, M. (2005b, July 7–8). The aims of European competition policy towards copyright collecting societies. Paper presented at SERCIAC, Montreal.
   Google Scholar
• Litman, J. (1987). Copyright, compromise, and legislative history. Cornell Law Review, 72, 857–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, L. (2015). “Let’s keep music special. F – Spotify”: On-demand streaming and the controversy over artist royalties. Creative Industries Journal, 8(2), 177–189. doi: 10.1080/17510694.2015.1096618
   Google Scholar
• Mazziotti, G. (2011). New licensing models for online music services in the European Union: From collective to customized management. Columbia Journal of Law and Arts, 34, 757–808.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, K., & DiCola, P. (2011). Creative license: The law and culture of digital sampling. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicola, S. (2016). YouTube’s seven-year music battle ends in Germany. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-11-01/youtube-gets-unblocked-in-germany-after-truce-with-rights-group
   Google Scholar
• Rosati, E. (2013). Originality in EU copyright. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• SACEM. (2012). Statutes. Retrieved from http://www.sacem.lu/download/213/statuts-eng-2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schroff, S. (2014). The evolution of copyright policies (1880–2010) – a comparison between Germany, the UK, the US and the International Level (PhD thesis). Retrieved from https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/49708/
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, M. (2013). Unfree masters: Recording artists and the politics of work. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stamatoudi, I., & Torremans, P. (Eds.). (2014). EU copyright law – a commentary. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Steinmo, S., Thelen, K., & Longstreth, F. (1992). Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Towse, R. (2003). Copyright policy, cultural policy and support for artists. In W. Gordon & R. Watt (Eds.), The economics of copyright: Developments in research and analysis (pp. 66–80). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• UK Music. (2010). Liberating creativity. London: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ukmusic.org/assets/media/Liberating%20Creativity.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wikstrom, P. (2009). The music industry. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar