It’s us against them: a comparative experiment on the effects of populist messages communicated via social media

References

• Akkerman, A., Mudde, C., & Zaslove, A. (2014). How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters. Comparative Political Studies, 47(9), 1324–1353. doi: 10.1177/0010414013512600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, T. (2011). Friend or foe? Right-wing populism and the popular press in Britain and the Netherlands. Journalism, 12, 931–945. doi: 10.1177/1464884911415972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, J., Birdwell, J., & Littler, M. (2011). The new face of digital populism. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707–731. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, L., van der Brug, W., & de Vreese, C. H. (2013). An experimental test of the impact of style and rhetoric on the perception of right-wing populist and mainstream party leaders. Acta Politica, 48(2), 192–208. doi: 10.1057/ap.2012.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brader, T. (2005). Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 388–405. doi: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00130.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47, 2–16. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2007). Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 1, 238–266.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, T. L. (2008). Crime news and racialized beliefs: Understanding the relationship between local news viewing and perceptions of African Americans and crime. Journal of Communication, 58, 106–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00376.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F. (2016). Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2014a). Level of education. Retrieved March 15, 2016, from http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2014b). Share of non-nationals in the resident population. Retrieved March 3, 2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16, 411–426. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M., Bos, L., & de Vreese, C. H. (2016). “They did it”: The effects of emotionalized blame attribution in populist communication. Communication Research. doi:10.1177/0093650216644026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K. A., Riding, S., & Mudde, C. (2012). Measuring populist attitudes (Political Concepts Committee on Concepts and Methods No. 55). Mexico City: C&M.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41(3), 924–936. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.3.924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Housholder, E. E., & LaMarre, H. L. (2014). Facebook politics: Toward a process model for achieving political source credibility through social media. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(4), 368–382. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2014.951753
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knigge, P. (1998). The ecological correlates of right-wing extremism in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 34, 249–279. doi: 10.1023/A:1006953714624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krämer, B. (2014). Media populism: A conceptual clarification and some theses on its effects. Communication Theory, 24, 42–60. doi: 10.1111/comt.12029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenz, G. S. (2009). Learning and opinion change, not priming: Reconsidering the priming hypothesis. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 821–837. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00403.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubbers, M. (2008). Regarding the Dutch ‘nee’ to the European constitution: A test of the identity, utilitarian and political approaches to voting ‘no’. European Union Politics, 9(1), 59–86. doi: 10.1177/1465116507085957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., & Schmuck, D. (2017). The effects of anti-immigrant right-wing populist ads on implicit and explicit attitudes: A moderated mediation model. Communication Research, 44(4), 556–581. doi:10.1177/0093650215577859 doi: 10.1177/0093650215577859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, G. (2008). Populism and the media. In D. Albertazzi & D. McDonnell (Eds.), Twenty-first century populism: The spectre of Western European democracy (pp. 49–64). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Meirick, P. C., & Nisbett, G. S. (2011). I approve this message: Effects of sponsorship, ad tone, and reactance in 2008 presidential advertising. Mass Communication and Society, 14(5), 666–689. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2010.530381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39, 542–564. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nekmat, E., Gower, K. K., Zhou, S., & Metzger, M. (2015). Connective-collective action on social media moderated mediation of cognitive elaboration and perceived source credibility on personalness of source. Communication Research. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0093650215609676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. A. (2010). A private sphere: Democracy in a digital age. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Pingree, R. J. (2007). How messages affect their senders: A more general model of message effects and implications for deliberation. Communication Theory, 17, 439–461. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00306.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richey, S. (2012). Campaign advertising and the stimulation and activation of the authoritarian personality. Political Communication, 29(1), 24–43. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2011.616874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmuck, D., & Matthes, J. (2015). How anti-immigrant right-wing populist advertisements affect young voters: Symbolic threats, economic threats and the moderating role of education. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(10), 1577–1599. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2014.981513 doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2014.981513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, S. L. (2008). Anti-immigrant attitudes in Europe: Outgroup size and perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review, 24(1), 53–67. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcm034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sniderman, P. M., Peri, P., de Figueiredo , R. J. P. , Jr., & Piazza, T. (2000). The outsider: Prejudice and politics in Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556–577. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taggart, P. (2000). Populism. Buckingham: Open University press.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity, and social comparisons. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 61–78). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilley, J., & Hobolt, S. B. (2011). Is the government to blame? An experimental test of how partisanship shapes perceptions of performance and responsibility. Journal of Politics, 73(2), 316–330. doi: 10.1017/S0022381611000168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, B. E., Ardèvol-Abreu, A., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2015). Online influence? Social media use, opinion leadership, and political persuasion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edv0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar