Populist online communication: introduction to the special issue

References

• Aalberg, T., & de Vreese, C. H. (2017). Introduction: Comprehending populist political communication. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, & C. H. de Vreese (Eds.), Populist political communication in Europe (pp. 3–11). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Reinemann, C., Strömbäck, J., & de Vreese, C. H. (Eds.). (2017). Populist political communication in Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Abts, K., & Rummens, S. (2007). Populism versus democracy. Political Studies, 55(2), 405–424. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00657.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, T. (2011). Friend or foe? Right-wing populism and the popular press in Britain and the Netherlands. Journalism, 12(8), 931–945. doi: 10.1177/1464884911415972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albertazzi, D., & McDonnell, D. (Eds.). (2008). Twenty-first century populism: The spectre of Western European democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Altheide, D. L. (2014). Media edge: Media logic and social reality. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Altheide, D. L., & Snow, R. P. (1979). Media logic. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Alvares, C., & Dahlgren, P. (2016). Populism, extremism and media: Mapping an uncertain terrain. European Journal of Communication, 31(1), 46–57. doi: 10.1177/0267323115614485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anstead, N., & Chadwick, A. (2009). Parties, election campaigning, and the internet: Toward a comparative institutional approach. In A. Chadwick & P. N. Howard (Eds.), Routledge handbook of internet politics (pp. 56–71). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aslanidis, P. (2016). Is populism an ideology? A refutation and a new perspective. Political Studies, 64(1S), 88–104. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atton, C. (2004). An alternative internet. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, J., Birdwell, J., & Littler, M. (2011). The new face of digital populism. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Manheim, J. B. (2006). The one-step flow of communication. Annals of the American Academy of Political & Social Science, 608, 213–232. doi: 10.1177/0002716206292266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bimber, B. (1998). The internet and political transformation: Populism, community, and accelerated pluralism. Polity, 31(1), 133–160. doi: 10.2307/3235370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, L., & Brants, K. (2014). Populist rhetoric in politics and media: A longitudinal study of the Netherlands. European Journal of Communication, 29(6), 703–719. doi: 10.1177/0267323114545709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, L., van der Brug, W., & de Vreese, C. (2011). How the media shape perceptions of right-wing populist leaders. Political Communication, 28(2), 182–206. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2011.564605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caiani, M., & Graziano, P. (2016). Varieties of populism: Insights from the Italian case. Italian Political Science Review, 46(2), 243–267.
   Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2–16. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. (2002). Taking politics to the people: Populism as the ideology of democracy. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 25–44). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Carlisle, J. E., & Patton, R. C. (2013). Is social media changing how we understand political engagement? An analysis of Facebook and the 2008 presidential election. Political Research Quarterly, 66(4), 883–895. doi: 10.1177/1065912913482758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, S. (2005). New mediation and direct representation: Reconceptualizing representation in the digital age. New Media & Society, 7(2), 177–198. doi: 10.1177/1461444805050745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, S., & Blumler, J. G. (2009). The internet and democratic citizenship: Theory, practice and policy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., & Arvidsson, A. (2014). Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in Twitter using big data. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 317–332. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranmer, M. (2011). Populist communication and publicity: An empirical study of contextual differences in Switzerland. Swiss Political Science Review, 17(3), 286–307. doi: 10.1111/j.1662-6370.2011.02019.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, P. (2005). The internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147–162. doi: 10.1080/10584600590933160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H., & Beck, J. C. (2001). The attention economy: Understanding the new currency of business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• de la Torre, C. (Ed.). (2015). The promise and perils of populism: Global perspectives. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
   Google Scholar
• Downey, J., & Fenton, N. (2003). New media, counter publicity and the public sphere. New Media & Society, 5(2), 185–202. doi: 10.1177/1461444803005002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elchardus, M., & Spruyt, B. (2016). Populism, persistent republicanism and declinism: An empirical analysis of populism as a thin ideology. Government and Opposition, 51(1), 111–133. doi: 10.1017/gov.2014.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication, & Society, 20(8), 1109–1126. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esser, F., Stepinska, A., & Hopmann, D. (2017). Populism and the media: Cross-national findings and perspectives. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, & C. H. de Vreese (Eds.), Populist political communication in Europe (pp. 365–380). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298–320. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfw006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A. (2004). On a sociology of the media. Political Communication, 21(3), 305–307. doi: 10.1080/10584600490481334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2014). Populism 2.0. In D. Trottier & C. Fuchs (Eds.), Social media, politics and the state: Protests, revolutions, riots, crime and policing in the age of Facebook, Twitter and YouTube (pp. 16–67). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Groshek, J., & Engelbert, J. (2013). Double differentiation in a cross-national comparison of populist political movements and online media uses in the United States and the Netherlands. New Media & Society, 15(2), 183–202. doi: 10.1177/1461444812450685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M., Bos, L., & de Vreese, C. (2016). ‘They did it’: The effects of emotionalized blame attribution in populist communication. Communication Research, online first. doi: 10.1177/0093650216644026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K. A. (2009). Is Chavez populist? Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 42(8), 1040–1067. doi: 10.1177/0010414009331721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herkman, J. (2017). The life cycle model and press coverage of Nordic populist parties. Journalism Studies, 18(4), 430–448. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2015.1066231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintz, A. (2015). Internet freedoms and restrictions: The policy environment for online alternative media. In C. Atton (Ed.), The Routledge companion to alternative and community media (pp. 235–246). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash. Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP16-026. Retrieved from https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/workingpapers/citation.aspx?PubId=11325
   Google Scholar
• Irvine, J. (2001). Style as distinctiveness: The culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. In P. Eckert & J. Rickford (Eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation (pp. 21–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H., & Cappella, J. N. (2008). Echo chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the conservative media establishment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, R. (2011). Populist mobilization: A new theoretical approach to populism. Sociological Theory, 29(2), 75–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2011.01388.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinger, U., & Svensson, J. (2015). The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approach. New Media & Society, 17(8), 1241–1257. doi: 10.1177/1461444814522952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinger, U., & Svensson, J. (2016). Network media logic: Some conceptual considerations. In A. Bruns, G. Enli, E. Skogerbø, A. O. Larsson, & C. Christensen (Eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 23–38). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R., & Olzak, S. (2004). Discursive opportunities and the evolution of right-wing violence in Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 110(1), 198–230. doi: 10.1086/386271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R., & Statham, P. (2003). Challenging immigration and ethnic relations politics: Comparative European perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krämer, B. (2014). Media populism: A conceptual clarification and some theses on its effects. Communication Theory, 24, 42–60. doi: 10.1111/comt.12029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. (1995). New social movements in Western Europe a comparative analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. (2004). Strategic political communication: Mobilizing public opinion in audience democracies. In F. Esser, & B. Pfetsch (Eds.), Comparing political communication: Theories, cases, and challenges (pp. 184–212). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. (2014). The populist challenge. West European Politics, 37(2), 361–378. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2014.887879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., & Pappas, T. S. (Eds.). (2015). European populism in the shadow of the great recession. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kruikemeier, S., van Noort, G., Vliegenthart, R., & de Vreese, C. H. (2013). Getting closer: The effects of personalized and interactive online political communication. European Journal of Communication, 28(1), 53–66. doi: 10.1177/0267323112464837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lanham, R. A. (2006). The economics of attention: Style and substance in the age of information. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E.-J., & Jang, J.-W. (2013). Not so imaginary interpersonal contact with public figures on social network sites: How affiliative tendency moderates its effects. Communication Research, 40(1), 27–51. doi: 10.1177/0093650211431579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, G. (2003). The media and the growth of neo-populism in contemporary democracies. In G. Mazzoleni (Ed.), The media and neo-populism: A contemporary comparative analysis (pp. 1–20). Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930–1970 (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mény, Y., & Surel, Y. (2000). Par le peuple, pour le peuple: Le populisme et les démocraties. Paris: Fayard.
   Google Scholar
• Mény, Y., & Surel, Y. (2002). The constitutive ambiguity of populism. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 1–21). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Moffitt, B., & Tormey, S. (2014). Rethinking populism: Politics, mediatisation and political style. Political Studies, 62(2), 381–397. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 542–563. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2012a). Populism and (liberal) democracy: A framework for analysis. In C. Mudde & C. Rovira Kaltwasser (Eds.), Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or corrective for democracy? (pp. 1–26). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (Eds.). (2012b). Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or corrective for democracy? New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Levy, D., & Nielsen, R. K. (2016). Reuters institute digital news report 2016, from http://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Digital-News-Report-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. E., & Rahn, W. M. (2016). Rise of the Trumpenvolk: Populism in the 2016 election. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 667(1), 189–206. doi: 10.1177/0002716216662639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pfetsch, B., Adam, S., & Bennett, W. L. (2013). The critical linkage between online and offline media. Javnost-The Public, 20(3), 9–22. doi: 10.1080/13183222.2013.11009118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinemann, C., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Strömbäck, J., & de Vreese, C. H. (2017). Populist political communication: Toward a model of its causes, forms, and effects. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, & C. H. de Vreese (Eds.), Populist political communication in Europe (pp. 12–25). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M. (2014). The mesmerising message: The diffusion of populism in public debates in Western European media. Political Studies, 62(4), 726–744. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., De Lange, S. L., & Van der Brug, W. (2014). A populist zeitgeist? Programmatic contagion by populist parties in Western Europe. Party Politics, 20(4), 563–575. doi: 10.1177/1354068811436065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, A., Müller, P., Schemer, C., Wirz, D., Wettstein, M., & Wirth, W. (2017). Measuring populist attitudes on three dimensions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edw037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, P. J., & Cohen, A. A. (2006). News around the world content, practitioners, and the public. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, P. J., & Vos, T. P. (2009). Gatekeeping theory. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stanyer, J. (2008). Elected representatives, online self-presentation and the personal vote: Party, personality and webstyles in the United States and United Kingdom. Information, Communication & Society, 11(3), 414–432. doi: 10.1080/13691180802025681
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taggart, P. (2000). Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taggart, P. (2002). Populism and the pathology of representative politics. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 62–80). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C., & Valeriani, A. (2015). Follow the leader! Direct and indirect flows of political communication during the 2013 Italian general election campaign. New Media & Society, 17(7), 1025–1042. doi: 10.1177/1461444813511038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Kessel, S., & Castelein, R. (2016). Shifting the blame: Populist politicians’ use of Twitter as a tool of opposition. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 12(2), 594–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative Politics, 34(1), 1–22. doi: 10.2307/422412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, B. A., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2011). After broadcast news: Media regimes, democracy, and the new information environment. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wirth, W., Esser, F., Wettstein, M., Engesser, S., Wirz, D., Schulz, A., …, Schemer, C. (2016). The appeal of populist ideas, strategies and styles: A theoretical model and research design for analyzing populist political communication. Working Paper 88 of the NCCR Democracy at the University of Zurich. Retrieved from http://www.nccr-democracy.uzh.ch/publications/workingpaper/wp88
   Google Scholar
• Xenos, M., Vromen, A., & Loader, B. D. (2014). The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 151–167. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.871318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar