Extreme parties and populism: an analysis of Facebook and Twitter across six countries

References

• Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Reinemann, C., Strömbäck, J., & de Vreese, C. (Eds.). (2017). Populist political communication in Europe. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Abts, K., & Rummens, S. (2007). Populism versus democracy. Political Studies, 55(2), 405–424. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00657.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, T., de Lange, S. L., & Rooduijn, M. (2016). Inclusion and mainstreaming: Radical right-wing populist parties in the new millennium. In T. Akkerman, S. de Lange, & L. Rooduijn (Eds.), Radical right-wing populist parties in Western Europe: Into the mainstream? (pp. 1–28). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Albertazzi, D., & McDonnell, D. (2008). Introduction: A New spectre for Western Europe. In D. Albertazzi & D. McDonnell (Eds.), Twenty-first century populism: The spectre of Western European democracy (pp. 1–11). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, R., de Vries, C., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Marks, G., … Vachudova, M. A. (2014). Measuring party positions in Europe: The chapel hill expert survey trend file, 1999-2010. Party Politics, 21(1), 143–152. doi: 10.1177/1354068812462931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, J. (2014). Populism, social media and democratic strain. In G. Lodge & G. Gottfried (Eds.), Democracy in Britain: Essays in honour of James Cornford (pp. 91–96). London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W., & Manheim, J. (2006). The one-step flow of communication. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 608(1), 213–232. doi: 10.1177/0002716206292266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhard, L. (2016). Left or Right? Populist communication of political parties in recent Western European elections (pp. 1–12) (Working Paper No. 92). Zürich: NCCR Democracy.
   Google Scholar
• Bimber, B. (1998). The internet and political transformation: Populism, community, and accelerated pluralism. Polity, 31(1), 133–160. doi: 10.2307/3235370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, L., van der Brug, W., & de Vreese, C. (2011). How the media shape perceptions of right-wing populist leaders. Political Communication, 28(2), 182–206. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2011.564605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, R. L., & Prediger, D. J. (1981). Coefficient Kappa: Some uses, misuses, and alternatives. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41(3), 687–699. doi: 10.1177/001316448104100307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2–16. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casero-Ripolles, A., Feenstra, R. A., & Tormey, S. (2016). Old and New media logics in an electoral campaign: The case of podemos and the two-way street mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 378–397. doi: 10.1177/1940161216645340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cranmer, M. (2011). Populist communication and publicity: An empirical study of contextual differences in Switzerland. Swiss Political Science Review, 17(3), 286–307. doi: 10.1111/j.1662-6370.2011.02019.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos, A., Riefler, P., & Roth, K. P. (2008). Advancing formative measurement models. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1203–1218. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan, M., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2015). Demographics of key social networking platforms. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Technology. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/09/demographics-of-key-social-networking-platforms-2/
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014). Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 855–870. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1109–1126. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esser, F., Stępińska, A., & Hopmann, D. N. (2017). Populism and the media: Cross-national findings and perspectives. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, & C. de Vreese (Eds.), Populist political communication in Europe (pp. 365–380). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2015). Populism 2.0. In D. Trottier & C. Fuchs (Eds.), Social media, politics and the state. Protests, revolutions, riots, crime and policing in the age of Facebook, Twitter and YouTube (pp. 16–67). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Golbeck, J., Grimes, J. M., & Rogers, A. (2010). Twitter use by the U.S. Congress. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(8), 1612–1621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groshek, J., & Engelbert, J. (2013). Double differentiation in a cross-national comparison of populist political movements and online media uses in the United States and the Netherlands. New Media & Society, 15(2), 183–202. doi: 10.1177/1461444812450685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K. A. (2009). Is Chávez populist? Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 42(8), 1040–1067. doi: 10.1177/0010414009331721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinisch, R. (2003). Success in opposition – failure in government: Explaining the performance of right-wing populist parties in public office. West European Politics, 26(3), 91–130. doi: 10.1080/01402380312331280608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermida, A. (2010). From TV to Twitter: How ambient news became ambient journalism. M/C Journal, 13(2), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K., & Spierings, N. (2016). Social media, parties, and political inequalities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, R. S. (2011). Populist mobilization: A New theoretical approach to populism. Sociological Theory, 29(2), 75–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2011.01388.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsen, R., & Enjolras, B. (2016). Styles of social media campaigning and influence in a hybrid political communication system: Linking candidate survey data with Twitter data. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 338–357. doi: 10.1177/1940161216645335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsen, R. (2015). Followers are opinion leaders: The role of people in the flow of political communication on and beyond social networking sites. European Journal of Communication, 30(3), 301–318. doi: 10.1177/0267323115577305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communication. Glencoe: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Kessel, S., & Castelein, R. (2016). Shifting the blame: Populist politicians’ use of Twitter as a tool of opposition. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 12(2), 594–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyling, T. & Jünger, J. (2013). Facepager (Version, f.e. 3.3). Retrieved from https://github.com/strohne/Facepager
   Google Scholar
• Klinger, U., & Svensson, J. (2015). The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approach. New Media & Society, 17(8), 1241–1257. doi: 10.1177/1461444814522952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinger, U. (2013). Mastering the art of social media: Swiss parties, the 2011 national election and digital challenges. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 717–736. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.782329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. (2014). The populist challenge. West European Politics, 37(2), 361–378. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2014.887879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruikemeier, S., van Noort, G., Vliegenthart, R., & de Vreese, C. (2013). Getting closer: The effects of personalized and interactive online political communication. European Journal of Communication, 28(1), 53–66. doi: 10.1177/0267323112464837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landerer, N. (2014). Opposing the government but governing the audience? Journalism Studies, 15(3), 304–320. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2014.889466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. O. (2015). Comparing to prepare: Suggesting ways to study social media today – and tomorrow. Social Media + Society, 1(1), 1–2. doi: 10.1177/2056305115578680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mény, Y., & Surel, Y. (2002). The constitutive ambiguity of populism. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 1–21). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. Stanford, CA: Standford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 542–563. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2013). Populism. In M. Freeden & M. Stears (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political ideologies (pp. 493–512). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Levy, D. A. L., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Reuters institute digital news report 2016. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Quarfoot, D., & Levine, R. A. (2016). How robust are multirater interrater reliability indices to changes in frequency distribution? The American Statistician, 70(4), 373–384. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2016.1141708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., & Akkerman, T. (2015). Flank attacks: Populism and left-right radicalism in Western Europe. Party Politics, 23(3), 193–204. doi: 10.1177/1354068815596514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, A., Müller, P., Schemer, C., Wirz, D. S., Wettstein, M., & Wirth, W. (2017). Measuring populist attitudes on three dimensions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edw037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. N., Fischer, E., & Yongjian, C. (2012). How does brand-related user-generated content differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 102–111. doi: 10.1016/j.intmar.2012.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanyer, J., Salgado, S., & Strömbäck, J. (2017). Populist actors as communicators or political actors as populist communicators: Cross-national findings and perspectives. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, & C. de Vreese (Eds.), Populist political communication in Europe (pp. 353–364). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Steenbergen, M. & Weber, E. (2015). Populism, ideology, and party politics: Preliminary analyses in space and time (pp. 1–16). Conference paper. 8th NCCR Democracy Internal Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Social media and political communication: A social media analytics framework. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3(4), 1277–1291. doi: 10.1007/s13278-012-0079-3
   Google Scholar
• Swasy, A. (2016). A little birdie told Me: Factors that influence the diffusion of Twitter in newsrooms. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(4), 643–656. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2016.1234480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taggart, P. (2000). Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taggart, P. (2004). Populism and representative politics in contemporary Europe. Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(3), 269–288. doi: 10.1080/1356931042000263528
   Google Scholar
• Taguieff, P. A. (1997). Le populisme et la science politique: Du mirage conceptuel aux vrais problemes. Vingtieme Siècle: Revue D'Histoire, 56(1), 4–33. doi: 10.3406/xxs.1997.4489
   Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C., & Valeriani, A. (2015). Follow the leader! Direct and indirect flows of political communication during the 2013 Italian general election campaign. New Media & Society, 17(7), 1025–1042. doi: 10.1177/1461444813511038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vis, F. (2013). Twittter as a reporting tool for breaking news. Digital Journalism, 1(1), 27–47. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2012.741316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wettstein, M. (2014a). Angrist 1.2. Documentation and reference for the coder interface. Retrieved from http://www.ipmz.uzh.ch/de/Abteilungen/Medienpsychologie/Recource/Angrist.html
   Google Scholar
• Wettstein, M. (2014b) “Best of both worlds”: Die halbautomatische inhaltsanalyse. In K. Sommer, M. Wettstein, W. Wirth, & J. Matthes (Eds.), Automatisierung in der inhaltsanalyse (pp. 16–39). Köln: Halem.
   Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a contested concept – populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative Politics, 34(1), 1–22. doi: 10.2307/422412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth, W., Esser, F., Wettstein, M., Engesser, S., Wirz, D., Schulz, A.,. … Schemer, C. (2016). The appeal of populist ideas, strategies and styles: A theoretical model and research design for analyzing populist political communication (pp. 1–60). ( Working Paper No. 88). Zürich: NCCR Democracy . Retrieved from http://www.nccr-democracy.uzh.ch/publications/workingpaper/wp88
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, S. W., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2014). Connecting blog, Twitter and Facebook use with gaps in knowledge and participation. Communication & Society, 27(4), 33–48. doi: 10.15581/003.27.4.33-48
   Google Scholar