Political talk on mobile instant messaging services: a comparative analysis of Germany, Italy, and the UK

References

• Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts, P. (2010). Within walls: private life in the German Democratic Republic . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d. (2011). Social network sites as networked publics. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self. Identity, community and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bytzek, E., & Bieber, I. E. (2016). Does survey mode matter for studying electoral behaviour? Evidence from the 2009 German longitudinal election study. Electoral Studies, 43, 41–51. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2016.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caiani, M., & Wagemann, C. (2009). Online networks of the Italian and German extreme right: An explorative study with social network analysis. Information, Communication & Society, 12(1), 66–109. doi: 10.1080/13691180802158482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. W. (2013). Mobile media and communication: A new field, or just a new journal? Mobile Media & Communication, 1(1), 8–13. doi: 10.1177/2050157912459495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. W., & Kwak, N. (2010). Mobile communication and civic life: Linking patterns of use to civic and political engagement. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 536–555. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01496.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. Y., Bentley, F., Holz, C., & Xu, C. (2015 August). Sharing (and discussing) the moment: The conversations that occur around shared mobile media. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services (pp. 264–273). Copenhagen, Denmark: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, J., Gil De Zuñiga, H., Rojas, H., & Shah, D. V. (2003). Beyond access: The digital divide and internet uses and gratifications. It & Society, 1, 46–72.
   Google Scholar
• Church, K., & de Oliveira, R. (2013). What’s up with WhatsApp? Comparing mobile instant messaging behaviors with traditional SMS. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services (pp. 352–361). Munich, Germany: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, L. S. (2016). Participants on the margins: #BlackLivesMatter and the role that shared artifacts of engagement played among minoritized political newcomers on Snapchat, Facebook, and Twitter. International Journal of Communication, 10(26), 235–253.
   Google Scholar
• Das, S., & Kramer, A. D. (2013). Self-censorship on Facebook. In Proceedings of the seventh international AAAI conference on weblogs and social Media (pp. 120–127). Washington, DC: AAAI.
   Google Scholar
• Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Exploring the relationship between college students’ use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New media & Society, 13(6), 873–892. doi: 10.1177/1461444810385389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaines, B. J., & Mondak, J. J. (2009). Typing together? Clustering of ideological types in online social networks. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 6(3–4), 216–231. doi: 10.1080/19331680903031531
   Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Valenzuela, S. (2011). The mediating path to a stronger citizenship: Online and offline networks, weak ties, and civic engagement. Communication Research, 38(3), 397–421. doi: 10.1177/0093650210384984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goggin, G. (2009). Adapting the mobile phone: The iPhone and its consumption. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 23(2), 231–244. doi: 10.1080/10304310802710546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., Glynn, C. J., & Shanahan, J. (2005). Willingness to self-censor: A construct and measurement tool for public opinion research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(3), 298–323. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edh073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helles, R. (2013). Mobile communication and intermediality. Mobile Media & Communication, 1(1), 14–19. doi: 10.1177/2050157912459496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, J. (2006). Staunching emigration from East Germany: Age and the determinants of migration. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4(5), 1014–1037. doi: 10.1162/JEEA.2006.4.5.1014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, M., & Tyrell, M. (2010). The legacy of surveillance: An explanation for social capital erosion and the persistent economic disparity between East and West Germany. Available at SSRN 1554604.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523. doi: 10.1086/268109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, R. (2011). China’s “networked authoritarianism”. Journal of Democracy, 22(2), 32–46. doi: 10.1353/jod.2011.0033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. A. (2015). Mobile news use and participation in elections: A bridge for the democratic divide? Mobile Media & Communication, 3(2), 230–249. doi: 10.1177/2050157914550664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E., & boyd, d. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. doi: 10.1177/1461444810365313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min, S. J. (2010). From the digital divide to the democratic divide: Internet skills, political interest, and the second-level digital divide in political internet use. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7(1), 22–35. doi: 10.1080/19331680903109402
   Google Scholar
• Neumayer, C., & Stald, G. (2014). The mobile phone in street protest: Texting, tweeting, tracking, and tracing. Mobile Media & Communication, 2(2), 117–133. doi: 10.1177/2050157913513255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noelle-Neumann, E. (1984). The spiral of silence: Public opinion, our social skin. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hara, K. P., Massimi, M., Harper, R., Rubens, S., & Morris, J. (2014). Everyday dwelling with WhatsApp. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 1131–1143). Baltimore, MD: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2011). Conclusion. A networked self. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self. Identity, community and culture on social network sites (pp. 304–317). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pasek, J. (2016). When will nonprobability surveys mirror probability surveys? Considering types of inference and weighting strategies as criteria for correspondence. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 28(2), 269–291. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edv016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quan-Haase, A., & Young, A. L. (2010). Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 350–361. doi: 10.1177/0270467610380009
   Google Scholar
• Rainie, H., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, D., Clarke, H. D., Stewart, M. C., & Whiteley, P. (2007). Does mode matter for modeling political choice? Evidence from the 2005 British election study. Political Analysis, 15(3), 257–285. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpl010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (2000). Twenty-five years of the spiral of silence: A conceptual review and empirical outlook. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12(1), 3–28. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/12.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schudson, M. (1997). Why conversation is not the soul of democracy. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 14(4), 297–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleeper, M., Balebako, R., Das, S., McConahy, A. L., Wiese, J., & Cranor, L. F. (2013). The post that wasn’t: Exploring self-censorship on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 793–802). San Antonio, TX: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Song, F. W. (2010). Theorizing web 2.0: A cultural perspective. Information, Communication & Society, 13(2), 249–275. doi: 10.1080/13691180902914610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utz, S., Muscanell, N., & Khalid, C. (2015). Snapchat elicits more jealousy than Facebook: A comparison of Snapchat and Facebook use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(3), 141–146. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C., Valeriani, A., Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2016). Of echo chambers and contrarian clubs: Exposure to political disagreement among German and Italian users of twitter. Social Media + Society. doi: 10.1177/2056305116664221
   Google Scholar
• Vaterlaus, J. M., Barnett, K., Roche, C., & Young, J. A. (2016). “Snapchat is more personal”: An exploratory study on Snapchat behaviors and young adult interpersonal relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 594–60. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellman, B. (2002). Little boxes, glocalization, and networked individualism. In M. Tanabe, P. van denBesselaar, & T. Ishida (Eds.), Digital cities II: Computational and sociological approaches (pp. 10–25). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M. (2010). ‘Don’t talk to me’: Effects of ideologically homogeneous online groups and politically dissimilar offline ties on extremism. New Media & Society, 12(4), 637–655. doi: 10.1177/1461444809342775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar