How does immersion work in augmented reality games? A user-centric view of immersion and engagement

References

• Andre, C. R., Corteel, E., Embrechts, J.-J., Verly, J. G., & Katz, B. F. G. (2014). Subjective evaluation of the audiovisual spatial congruence in the case of stereoscopic-3D video and wave field synthesis. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 72(1), 23–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, C. G., & Fairclough, S. H. (2015). Use of auditory event-related potentials to measure immersion during a computer game. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 73(1), 107–114. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Cairns, P., Cox, A. L., Day, M., Martin, H., & Perryman, T. (2013). Who but not where: The effect of social play on immersion in digital games. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71(11), 1069–1077. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caruana, A., La Rocca, A., & Snehota, I. (2016). Learner satisfaction in marketing simulation games. Journal of Marketing Education, 38(2), 107–118. doi: 10.1177/0273475316652442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christou, G. (2014). The interplay between immersion and appeal in video games. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 92–100. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, J. J., & Bailenson, J. N. (2016). How immersive is enough? A meta-analysis of the effect of immersive technology on user presence Media Psychology, 19(2), 272–309. doi: 10.1080/15213269.2015.1015740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumic, E., Grgic, S., & Grgic, M. (2010). Comparison of HDTV formats using objective video quality measures. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 49(3), 409–424. doi: 10.1007/s11042-009-0441-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elson, M., Breuer, J., Ivory, J. D., & Quandt, T. (2014). More than stories with buttons: Narrative, mechanics, and context as determinants of player experience in digital games. Journal of Communication, 64, 521–542. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felnhofer, A., Kothgassner, O. D., Schmidt, M., Heinzle, A.-K., Beutl, L., Hlavacs, H., & Kryspin-Exner, I. (2015). Is virtual reality emotionally arousing? Investigating five emotion inducing virtual park scenarios International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 82(1), 48–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.05.004
   Google Scholar
• Grinberg, A. M., Careaga, J. S., Mehl, M. R., & O’Connor, M.-F. (2014). Social engagement and user immersion in a socially based virtual world. Computers in Human Behavior, 36(6), 479–486. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.008
   Google Scholar
• Hou, J., Nam, Y., Peng, W., & Lee, K. M. (2012). Effects of screen size, viewing angle, and players’ immersion tendencies on game experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 617–623. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, T., & Liao, S. (2015). A model of acceptance of augmented-reality interactive technology: The moderating role of cognitive innovativeness. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2), 269–295. doi: 10.1007/s10660-014-9163-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, Y. (2011). Understanding the role of sense of presence and perceived autonomy in users’ continued use of social virtual worlds. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communications, 16(4), 492–510. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01540.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Song, H., & Luo, W. (2016). Broadening the understanding of social presence. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 570–577. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kounavis, C. D., Kasimati, A. E., & Zamani, E. D. (2012). Enhancing the tourism experience through mobile augmented reality. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 4(10), 1–6. doi: 10.5772/51644
   Google Scholar
• Laffana, D. A., Greaneya, J., Bartona, H., & Kayeb, L. K. (2016). The relationships between the structural video game characteristics, video game engagement and happiness among individuals who play video games. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 544–549. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine, T. H., & Suk, H. J. (2016). Designing mobile augmented reality exergames. Games and Culture, 11(5), 548–580. doi: 10.1177/1555412015572006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I.-J., Chen, C.-H., & Chang, K.-P. (2016). Augmented reality technology combined with three-dimensional holography to train the mental rotation ability of older adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 488–500. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majorek, M., & du Vall, M. (2016). Ingress: An example of a new dimension in entertainment. Games and Culture, 11(7), 667–689. doi: 10.1177/1555412015575833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreery, M. P., Vallett, D. B., & Clark, C. (2015). Social interaction in a virtual environment: Examining socio-spatial interactivity and social presence using behavioral analytics. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 203–206. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGloin, R., Farrar, K. M., & Fishlock, J. (2015). Triple whammy! Violent games and violent controllers: Investigating the use of realistic gun controllers on perceptions of realism, immersion, and outcome aggression. Journal of Communication, 65, 280–299. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, S. J. (2000). Exploring models of interactivity from multiple research traditions. In L. A. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs (pp. 163–181). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, H. L., & Bugnariu, N. L. (2016). Level of immersion in virtual environments impacts the ability to assess and teach social skills in autism spectrum disorder. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(4), 246–256. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morschheuser, B., Riar, M., Hamari, J., & Maedche, A. (2017). How games induce cooperation? A study on the relationship between game features and we-intentions in an augmented reality game. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 169–183. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, C. D., Fox, J., & Pettifer, S. (2007). Absorption, dissociation, locus of control and presence in virtual reality. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1347–1354. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newhagen, J. E. (2004). Interactivity, dynamic symbol processing, and the emergence of content in human communication. The Information Society, 20(5), 395–400. doi: 10.1080/01972240490508108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oleksy, T., & Wnuk, A. (2017). Catch them all and increase your place attachment! The role of location-based augmented reality games in changing people – place relation. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 3–8. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauschnabel, P. A., Rossmann, A., & tom Dieck, M. C. (2017). An adoption framework for mobile augmented reality games: The case of Pokémon Go. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 276–286. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, J. C. A., & Bohr, I. (2014). User experience while viewing stereoscopic 3D television. Ergonomics, 57(8), 1140–1153. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.914581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D. (2018). Empathy and embodied experience in virtual environment: To what extent can virtual reality stimulate empathy and embodied experience? Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 64–73. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D. (2011). Understanding e-book users: Uses and gratificationexpectancy model. New Media and Society, 13(2), 260–278. doi: 10.1177/1461444810372163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D. (2018). Empathy and embodied experience in virtualenvironment: To what extent can virtual reality stimulate empathy and embodied experience? Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 64–73. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D.-H. (2011). Understanding e-book users: Uses and gratification expectancy model. New Media and Society, 13(2), 260–278. doi: 10.1177/1461444810372163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D.-H. (2016). Do users experience real sociability through social TV? Analyzing parasocial behavior in relation to social TV. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(1), 140–159. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2015.1127247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D.-H., & Biocca, F. (2017). Explicating user behavior toward multi-screen adoption and diffusion. Internet Research, 27(2), 338–361. doi: 10.1108/IntR-12-2015-0334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D.-H., & Shin, Y. J. (2011). Why do people play social network games? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 852–861. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 72–100). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tabacchi, M. E., Caci, B., Cardaci, M., & Perticone, V. (2017). Early usage of Pokémon Go and its personality correlates. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 163–169. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, C.-I. (2010). Customization, immersion satisfaction, and online game loyalty. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1547–1554. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornson, C. A., Goldiez, B. F., & Le, H. (2009). Predicting presence: Constructing the tendency toward presence inventory. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(1), 62–78. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weibel, D., Wissmath, B., & Mast, F. W. (2010). Immersion in mediated environments: The role of personality traits. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 13, 251–256. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth, W., Hartmann, T., Böcking, S., Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C., Schramm, H., … Jäncke, P. (2007). A process model of the formation of spatial presence experiences. Media Psychology, 9(3), 493–525. doi: 10.1080/15213260701283079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y., Heynderickx, I., & Redi, J. A. (2015). Understanding the role of social context and user factors in video quality of experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 49(2), 412–426. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.054
   Google Scholar