2,633
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

‘Everything’ disappears … reflexive design and norm-critical intervention in the digitalization of cultural heritage

&
Pages 1361-1375 | Received 28 Oct 2016, Accepted 03 Jan 2018, Published online: 19 Jan 2018

References

  • Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology building society (pp. 205–224). Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Avison, D. E., Kendall, J. E., & DeGross, J. I. (Eds.). (1993). Human, organizational, and social dimensions of information systems development, Amsterdam.
  • Bardzell, J., & Bardzell, S. (2013). What is critical about critical design? Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 3297–3306). ACM.
  • Baskerville, R., Smithson, S., Ngwenyama, O., & DeGross, J. (1994). Transforming organizations with information technology: proceedings of the IFIP WG8.2 working conference on information technology and new emergent forms of organization, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 11-13 August, 1994 North Holland, Amsterdam, Holland. ISBN 9780444819451.
  • Calhoun, C. (1995). Critical social theory: Culture, history, and the challenge of difference. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2001). Doing critical IS research: The question of methodology. Qualitative Research in IS: Issues and Trends, 141–162.
  • Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., Klein, H. K., & Brooke, C. (2008). Exploring the critical agenda in information systems research. Information Systems Journal, 18(2), 123–135.
  • Cleaver, F. (2004). The social embeddedness of agency and decision-making. Participation ‒ from Tyranny to Transformation? Exploring New Approaches to Participation in Development, Zed Books.
  • Deuze, M. (2006). Participation, remediation, Bricolage: Considering principal components of a digital culture. The Information Society, 22(2), 63–75.
  • Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2001). Design noir: The secret life of electronic objects. Springer Science and Business Media.
  • Enhuber, M. (2015). Art, space and technology: How the digitisation and digitalisation of art space affect the consumption of art ‒ a critical approach. Digital Creativity, 26(2), 121–137.
  • Friedland, B., & Yamauchi, Y. (2011). Reflexive design thinking: Putting more human in human-centered practices. interactions, 18(2), 66–71.
  • Gidlund, K. L. (2015). Makers and Shapers or users and choosers participatory practices in digitalization of public sector. International Conference on Electronic Government (pp. 222–232). Springer International Publishing.
  • Grin, J., Felix, F., Bos, B., & Spoelstra, S. (2004). Practices for reflexive design: Lessons from a Dutch programme on sustainable agriculture. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1(1–2), 126–149.
  • Hallam, E., & Street, B. (Eds.). (2013). Cultural encounters: Representing otherness. Routledge.
  • Hansen, P. (1998). Schooling a European identity: Ethno-cultural exclusion and nationalist resonance within the EU policy of ‘The European dimension of education’. European Journal of Intercultural Studies, 9(1), 5–23.
  • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
  • Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28, 75–105.
  • Hirschheim, R., & Klein, H. K. (1989). Four paradigms of information systems development. Communications of the ACM, 32(10), 1199–1216.
  • Hirschheim, R., & Newman, M. (1991). Symbolism and information systems development: Myth, metaphor and magic. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 29–62.
  • Howcroft, D., & Trauth, E. M. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of critical information systems research: Theory and application. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
  • Iivari, J. (2007). A paradigmatic analysis of information systems as a design science. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 19(2), 39–63.
  • Kearney, R. (2005). Strangers, gods and monsters: Interpreting otherness. London: Routledge.
  • Löwgren, J., & Stolterman, E. (2004). Design av informationsteknik, materialet utan egenskaper. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Lundmark, S., & Normark, M. (2012). Reflections on norm-critical design efforts in online youth counselling. Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense through Design (pp. 438–447). ACM.
  • Lundmark, S., Normark, M., & Räsänen, M. (2011). Exploring norm-critical design in online youth counseling. 1st International Workshop on Values in Design–Building Bridges between RE, HCI and Ethics.
  • Lyytinen, K. (1992). Information systems and critical theory. In M. Alvesson & H. Willmott (Eds.), Critical management studies (pp. 159–180). London: Sage Publications.
  • Macdonald, S. (2006). Undesirable heritage: Fascist material culture and historical consciousness in Nuremberg. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 12(1), 9–28.
  • Macintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. In System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on (10 pp). IEEE.
  • Markus, M. L. (1983, June). Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Communications of the ACM, 26(6), 430–444.
  • McGrath, K. (2005). Doing critical research in information systems: A case of theory and practice not informing each other. Information Systems Journal, 15, 85–101.
  • Morley, D., & Robins, K. (2002). Spaces of identity: Global media, electronic landscapes and cultural boundaries. London: Routledge.
  • Myers, B. A. (1995, March). User interface software tools. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 2(1), 64–103.
  • Myers, M. D. (2004). Hermeneutics in information systems research. In J. Mingers & L. P. Willcocks (Eds.), Social theory and philosophy for information systems (pp. 103–128). Chichester: Wiley.
  • Myers, M. D., & Young, L. W. (1997). Hidden agendas, power, and managerial assumptions in information systems development: An ethnographic study. Information Technology and People, 10(3), 224–240.
  • Newman, M., & Robey, D. (1992). A social process model of user-analyst relationships. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 249–266.
  • Orlikowski, W. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.
  • Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying information technology in organisations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1–28.
  • Orlikowski, W. J., & Gash, D. C. (1994). Technological frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transaction on Information Systems, 12, 174–207.
  • Paskaleva-Shapira, K., Azorín, J., & Chiabai, A. (2008). Enhancing digital access to local cultural heritage through e-governance: Innovations in theory and practice from Genoa, Italy. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 21(4), 389–405. doi:10.1080/13511610802568031.
  • Sæbø, Ø, Rose, J., & Skiftenes Flak, L. (2008). The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 25(3), 400–428.
  • Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Sefyrin, J. (2012). From profession to practices in IT design. Science, Technology and Human Values, 37(6), 708–728.
  • Sefyrin, J., Danielsson Öberg, K., Ekelin, A., & Gidlund, K. L. (2013). Representational practices in demands driven development of public sector. International Conference on E-Government, the conference proceedings of Springer LNCS volume 7444, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
  • Shore, C. (2013). Building Europe: The cultural politics of European integration. London: Routledge.
  • Stolcke, V. (1995). Talking culture: New boundaries, new rhetorics of exclusion in Europe. Current Anthropology, 36, 1–24.
  • Stolterman, E. (2008). The nature of design practice and implications for interaction de-sign research. International Journal of Design, 2(1), 55–659.
  • Van Hooland, S. (2006). From spectator to annotator: Possibilities offered by user-generated metadata for digital cultural heritage collections. Immaculate Catalogues: Taxonomy, Metadata and Resource Discovery in the 21st Century, Proceedings of CILIP Conference.
  • Venable, J. (2006, February 24). The role of theory and theorising in design science research. In S. Chatterjee & A. Hevner (Eds), First International Conference on Design Science Re-search in Information Systems and Technology, Claremont, CA. Claremont, CA: Claremont Graduate University.
  • Vinthagen, R., & Zavalia, L. (2014). Normkreativ, Premiss Förlag, Halmstad.
  • Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting information systems in organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Walsham, G., & Waema, T. (1994, April). Information systems strategy and implementation: A case study of a building society. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12(2), 150–173.
  • Zuiderent-Jerak, T., & Bruun Jensen, C. (2007). Editorial introduction: Unpacking ‘intervention’ in science and technology studies. Science as Culture, 16(3), 227–235.