Ukrainian nationalist parties and connective action: an analysis of electoral campaigning and social media sentiments

References

• Bennett, W. L., Foot, K., & Xenos, M. A. (2011). Narratives and network organization: A comparison of fair trade systems in two nations. Journal of Communication, 61, 219–245. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01538.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, J. L. (2014). Expect us: Online communities and political mobilization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bimber, B., Flangin, A., & Stohl, C. (2012). Collective action in organizations: Interaction and engagement in an era of technological change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bunce, V. J., & Wolchik, S. L. (2012). Defeating authoritarian leaders in postcommunist countries. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chmiel, A., Sobkowicz, P., Sienkiewicz, J., Paltoglou, G., Buckley, K., Thelwall, M., & Holyst, J. A. (2011). Negative emotions boost user activity at BBC forum. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 390(16), 2936–2944. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2011.03.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, J. G., & Schilder, F. (2007). Opinion mining in legal blogs. Paper presented at the ICAIL01: The 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., Kifer, M. J., & Parkin, M. (2007). The technological development of congressional candidate web sites: How and why candidates use web innovations. Social Science Computer Review, 25, 425–442. doi: 10.1177/0894439307305623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2011). Ideological segregation online and offline. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 1799–1839. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjr044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Veenstra, A., Vraga, E., & & Shah, D. (2010). Digital democracy: Re-imagining pathways to political participation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7(1), 36–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x
   Google Scholar
• Gulati, J. G., & Williams, C. B. (2007). Closing the gap, raising the bar: Candidate web site communication in the 2006 campaigns for Congress. Social Science Computer Review, 25, 443–464. doi: 10.1177/0894439307305624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton, K., Lee, R., Lu, W., Dwyer, M., Shin, I., & Purcell, K. (2014, August 26). Social media and the ‘spiral of silence’. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/08/26/social-media-and-the-spiral-of-silence/
   Google Scholar
• Himelboim, I., McCreery, S., & Smith, M. (2013). Birds of a feather tweet together: Integrating network and content analyses to examine cross-ideology exposure on Twitter. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(2), 40–60. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D. J., & King, G. (2010). A method of automated nonparametric content analysis for social science. American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 229–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology, 25, 65–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00357.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huszka, B. (2014). Framing national identity in independence campaigns: Secessionist rhetoric and ethnic conflict. Nationalism and Ethnic Policies, 20(2), 153–173. doi: 10.1080/13537113.2014.909153
   Google Scholar
• Karpf, D. (2012). The MoveOn effect: The unexpected transformation of American political advocacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press..
   Google Scholar
• King, A. (2001). Affective dimensions of internet culture. Social Science Computer Review, 19(4), 414–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, N., Shulman, S. W., & Hovy, E. (2006). Multidimensional text analysis for eRulemaking. Paper presented at the 7th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Li, N., Akin, H., Su, L. Y.-F., Brossard, D., Xenos, M., & Scheufele, D. (2016). Tweeting disaster: An analysis of online discourse about nuclear power in the wake of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident. Journal of Science Communication, 15(5), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCully, A. (2006). Practitioner perceptions of their role in facilitating the handling of controversial issues in contested societies: A Northern Irish experience. Educational Review, 58(1), 51–65. doi: 10.1080/00131910500352671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meraz, S., & Papacharissi, Z. (2013). Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 1–29. doi: 10.1177/1940161212474472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mole, R. (2007). The impact of political discourse on group beliefs and outgroup antipathy among Latvian youth. Journal of Baltic Studies, 38(3), 273–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mungiu-Pippidi, A., & Munteanu, I. (2009). Moldova’s ‘Twitter revolution’. Journal of Democracy, 20(3), 136–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1–2), 1–135.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2004). Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media & Society, 6(2), 259–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 101–127. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shekhovtsev, A., & Umland, A. (2014). Ukraine’s radical right. Journal of Democracy, 25(3), 58–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shklovski, I., & Valtysson, B. (2012). Secretly political: Civic engagement in online publics in Kazakhstan. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(3), 417–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17, 281–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556–576. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, L. Y.-F., Cacciatore, M. A., Liang, X., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., & Xenos, M. A. (2016). Analyzing public sentiments online: Combining human- and computer-based content analysis. Information, Communication & Society, 20(3), 406–427. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1182197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z. (2014). The medium and the movement: Digital tools, social movement policies, and the end of the free rider problem. Policy and Internet, 6(2), 202–208.
   Google Scholar
• Umland, A., & Shekhovtsov, A. (2013). Ultraright party politics in post-Soviet Ukraine and the puzzle of electoral marginalism of Ukrainian ultranationalists in 1994-2009. Russian Politics and Law, 51(5), 33–58. doi: 10.2753/RUP1061-1940510502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M., & Mutz, D. (2009). Online groups and political discourse: Do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement? Journal of Communication, 59(1), 40–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01403.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M., & Smith, B. (2014). Will politics be tweeted? New media use by Iranian youth in 2011. New Media & Society, 16(1), 91–109. doi: 10.1177/1461444813479594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, L. J. (2012). Direct action, deliberation, and diffusion: Collective action after the WTO protests in Seattle. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yardi, S., & boyd, d. (2010). Dynamic debates: An analysis of group polarization over time on Twitter. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 30(5), 316–327. doi: 10.117/027046710380011
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, E. (2014). New media, new civics? Policy and Internet, 6(2), 151–168.
   Google Scholar