#IAmNotAfraidToSayIt: stories of sexual violence as everyday political speech on Facebook

References

• Bagguley, P. (2002). Contemporary British feminism: A social movement in abeyance? Social Movement Studies, 1(2), 169–185.
   Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohdanova, T. (2014). Unexpected revolution: The role of social media in Ukraine’s Euromaidan uprising. European View, 13(1), 133–142.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), Networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. (2016). ‘Hope in a hashtag’: The discursive activism of #WhyIStayed. Feminist Media Studies, 16(5), 788–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (1998). Fighting words: Black women and the search for justice (Vol. 7). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 19(6), 418–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. L., & Chouinard, J. B. (2017). Theorizing affordances: From request to refuse. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, doi: 10.1177/0270467617714944
   Google Scholar
• Dude, A. (2007). Intimate partner violence and increased lifetime risk of sexually transmitted infection among women in Ukraine. Studies in Family Planning, 38(2), 89–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, J, & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the internet age. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fãbiãn, K. (2010). Introduction: The Politics of Domestic Violence in Postcommunist Europe and Eurasia. In K. Fãbiãn (Ed.), Domestic violence in postcommunist states: Local activism, national policies, and global forces. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faraj, S., & Azad, B. (2012). The materiality of technology: An affordance perspective. In P. M. Leonardi, B. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 237–258). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fossato, F., Lloyd, J., & Verkhovsky, A. (2008). The web that failed: How opposition politics and independent initiatives are failing on the internet in Russia. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from http://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/fileadmin/documents/Publications/The_Web_that_Failed.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 56–80.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, M., Meese, J., Arnold, M., Nansen, B., & Carter, M. (2015). #Funeral and Instagram: Death, social media, and platform vernacular. Information, Communication & Society, 18(3), 255–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Highfield, T. (2016). Social media and everyday politics. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• hooks, b. (1989). Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black. Boston: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hrycak, A. (2010). Transnational advocacy campaigns and domestic violence prevention in Ukraine. In K. Fãbiãn (Ed.), Domestic violence in postcommunist states: Local activism, national policies, and global forces (pp. 45–77). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuntsman, A. (2012). Introduction: Affective Fabrics of Digital Cultures. In A. Karatzogianni & A. Kuntsman (Eds.), Digital cultures and the politics of emotion: Feelings, affect and technological change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Leurs, K. (2017). Feminist data studies: Using digital methods for ethical, reflexive and situated socio-cultural research. Feminist Review, 115(1), 130–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lokot, T. (2016a). Augmented dissent: The affordances of ICTs for citizen protest (a case study of the Ukraine Euromaidan protest of 2013-2014) (Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Lokot, T. (2016b, July 5). #IAmNotAfraidToSayIt: Ukrainian social media users break the silence on sexual violence. Global Voices. Retrieved from https://globalvoices.org/2016/07/05/iamnotafraidtosayit-ukrainian-social-media-users-break-the-silence-on-sexual-violence/
   Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A., Faraj, S., Kane, G. C., & Azad, B. (2013). The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(1), 38–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.2013.19.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martsenyuk, T., Volosevych, I., Konoplytska, T., Kostyuchenko, T., & Mikhanchuk, D. (2015, September 11). Дослідження поширеності насильства щодо дівчат та жінок [A study of the prevalence of violence towards girls and women]. eKMAIR. Retrieved from http://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/handle/123456789/6310
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212–1241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melnychenko, N. (2016, July 4). Untitled [Facebook status update]. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/nastya.melnychenko/posts/10209108320800151
   Google Scholar
• Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oates, S. (2013). Revolution stalled: The political limits of the internet in the post-soviet sphere. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Onuch, O. (2015). Euromaidan protests in Ukraine: Social media versus social networks. Problems of Post-Communism, 62(4), 217–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onuch, O., & Martsenyuk, T. (2014). Mothers and daughters of the Maidan: Gender, repertoires of violence, and the division of labour in Ukrainian protests. Social, Health, and Communication Studies Journal, 1(1), 105–126.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2016). Affective publics and structures of storytelling: Sentiment, events and mediality. Information, Communication & Society, 19(3), 307–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyatnitskaya, S. (2010, January 23). Yanukovych: A woman’s place is in the kitchen. Komsomolskaya Pravda. Retrieved from https://www.stav.kp.ru/online/news/606059/
   Google Scholar
• Rentschler, C. A. (2014). Rape culture and the feminist politics of social media. Girlhood Studies, 7(1), 65–82.
   Google Scholar
• Rentschler, C. A., & Thrift, S. C. (2015). Doing feminism in the network: Networked laughter and the ‘binders full of women’ meme. Feminist Theory, 16(3), 329–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodino­Colocino, M. (2014). # YesAllWomen: Intersectional mobilization against sexual assault is radical (again). Feminist Media Studies, 14(6), 1113–1115.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, F. (2012a). ‘HOTTEST 100 WOMEN’ cross-platform discursive activism in feminist blogging networks. Australian Feminist Studies, 27(74), 373–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, F. (2012b). The politics of blogs: Theories of discursive activism online. Media International Australia, 142(1), 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Siapera, E., & Veikou, M. (2013). Social media affordances and migrant political practices. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 12(4), 100–119.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1(1), 197–217.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Jr, Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2017, August 2). Database of names in the Ukrainian state census. Retrieved from http://database.ukrcensus.gov.ua/dw_name/find.asp
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1994). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, V. (1989). Social movement continuity: The women’s movement in abeyance. American Sociological Review, 54(5), 761–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrift, S. C. (2014). # YesAllWomen as feminist meme event. Feminist Media Studies, 14(6), 1090–1092.
   Google Scholar
• Turbine, V. (2013). Women’s political activism in contemporary Russia: Some reflections from the online sphere. Feminist and Women’s Studies Association Newsletter, 61, 10–11.
   Google Scholar
• UNFPA Ukraine. (2016, July 6). ЯНеБоюсьСказати (IAmNotAfraidToSayIt) [Facebook status update]. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/UNFPA.Ukraine/posts/1211053095585497
   Google Scholar
• Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2015, December 28). Law of Ukraine ‘On prevention of violence in the family’ #2789-III from November 15, 2001 (last amended in December 2015). Retrieved from http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2789-14
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. (2002). Publics and counterpublics. Public Culture, 14(1), 49–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Boase, J., Chen, W., Hampton, K., Díaz, I., & Miyata, K. (2003). The social affordances of the internet for networked individualism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(3). doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00216.x
   Google Scholar
• Young, S. (1997). Changing the wor(l)d: Discourse, politics and the feminist movement. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, H. (2016). Searchable talk as discourse practice on the internet: The case of ‘#bindersfullofwomen’. Discourse, Context & Media, 12, 87–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar