Location, location, location: how digital platforms reinforce the importance of spatial proximity

References

• Bakker, P. (2014). Mr. Gates returns. Journalism Studies, 15(5), 596–606. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2014.901783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzilai-Nahon, K. (2009). Gatekeeping: A critical review. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 43(1), 1–79.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2014). Local area personal income, 2014. Retrieved from http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/regional/lapi/lapi_newsrelease.htm
   Google Scholar
• Cairncross, F. (1997). The death of distance: How the communications revolution is changing our lives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, J. W. (1989). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, M. W. (2006). Creative commons and the new intermediaries. Michigan State Law Review, 1, 45–65.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Currid, E. (2007). The Warhol economy: How fashion, art, and music drive New York City. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, R., & Poor, N. (2015). The barriers facing artists’ use of crowdfunding platforms: Personality, emotional labor, and going to the well one too many times. New Media & Society, 17(2), 289–307. doi: 10.1177/1461444814558916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, R., & Poor, N. (2016). Factors for success in repeat crowdfunding: Why sugar daddies are only good for Bar-Mitzvahs. Information, Communication & Society, 19(1), 127–139. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1093533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, R. (2012). The rise of the creative class, revisited. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Frydrych, D., Bock, A. J., Kinder, T., &Koeck, B. (2014). Exploring entrepreneurial legitimacy in reward-based crowdfunding. Venture Capital, 16(3), 247–269. doi: 10.1080/13691066.2014.916512
   Google Scholar
• Galuszka, P., & Brzozowska, B. (2016). Crowdfunding and the democratization of the music market. Media, Culture & Society. doi: 10.1177/0163443716674364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, R. (2002). Cool, creative and egalitarian? Exploring gender in project-based new media work in Europe. Information, Communication & Society, 5(1), 70–89. doi: 10.1080/13691180110117668
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364. doi: 10.1177/1461444809342738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, A., & Robins, K. (1989). Geographical inequalities: The spatial bias of the new communications technologies. Journal of Communication, 39(3), 7–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1989.tb01037.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, M. A. (2000). When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organization Science, 11(3), 285–298. doi: 10.1287/orsc.11.3.285.12496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, C., & Zarro, M. (2012). Social curation on the website Pinterest.com. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(1), 1–9. doi: 10.1002/meet.14504901189
   Google Scholar
• Hepworth, M., & Robins, K. (1988). Whose information society? A view from the periphery. Media, Culture & Society, 10(3), 323–343. doi: 10.1177/016344388010003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesmondhalgh, D., & Baker, S. (2009). A very complicated version of freedom”: Conditions and experiences of creative labour in three cultural industries. Poetics, 38(1), 4–20. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2009.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, P. M. (1972). Processing fads and fashions: An organization-set analysis of cultural industry systems. American Journal of Sociology, 77(1), 639–659.
   Google Scholar
• Hui, J. S., Greenberg, M. D., & Gerber, E. M. (2014). Understanding the role of community in crowdfunding work. Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work &social computing. Baltimore, MA, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/2531602.2531715
   Google Scholar
• Internet Archive. (n.d.) https://www.kickstarter.com/help/stats Saved 605 times between June 21, 2012 and October 17, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kickstarter. (2016a). Curated pages. Retrieved from https://www.kickstarter.com/discover/curated-pages
   Google Scholar
• Kickstarter. (2016b). Introducing badges for projects we love. Retrieved from https://www.kickstarter.com/blog/introducing-projects-we-love-badges
   Google Scholar
• Kickstarter. (2016c). Our rules. Retrieved from https://www.kickstarter.com/rules
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. (2012). The institutionalization of YouTube: From user-generated content to professionally generated content. Media, Culture & Society, 34(1), 53–67. doi: 10.1177/0163443711427199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, B. (2013). The politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42(1), 327–343. doi: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton, K., & Marom, D. (2012). The crowdfunding revolution: How to raise venture capital using social media. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lessig, L. (1999). Code and other laws of cyberspace. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Macleod, G. (2014). Urban and regional horizons. Regional Studies, 48(4), 583–586. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.903717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosco, V. (2004). The digital sublime: Myth, power, and cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, R. K., & Ganter, S. A. (2017). Dealing with digital intermediaries: A case study of the relations between publishers and platforms. New Media & Society. doi: 10.1177/1461444817701318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petronzio, Matt. (2014). The top 10 countries by money pledged on Kickstarter. Mashable. Retrieved from http://mashable.com/2014/03/04/kickstarter-countries/#BGRK9Cvxziqo
   Google Scholar
• Poor, N. (2006). Playing internet curveball with traditional media gatekeepers: Pitcher Curt Schilling and Boston Red Sox fans. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 12(1), 41–53. doi: 10.1177/1354856506061553
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., … Stern, M. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 569–582. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochelandet, F. (2011). The internet: Economics. In R. Towse (Ed.), A handbook of cultural economics (2nd ed., pp. 254–260). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schejter, A. M., & Tirosh, N. (2015). ‘Seek the meek, seek the just’: social media and social justice. Telecommunications Policy, 39(9), 796–803. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2015.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schradie, J. (2011). The digital production gap: The digital divide and Web 2.0 collide. Poetics, 39(2), 145–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J. (2010). Cultural economy and the creative field of the city. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 92(2), 115–130. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0467.2010.00337.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J. (2011). Emerging cities of the third wave. City, 15(3–4), 289–321. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2011.595569
   Google Scholar
• Standage, T. (1998). The Victorian internet: The remarkable story of the telegraph and the nineteenth century’s on-line pioneers. New York, NY: Walker and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, B., Chen, W., & Butler, J. S. (2016). Bubbling up the good ideas: A two-mode network analysis of an intra-organizational idea challenge. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(3), 210–229. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strickler, Y. (2009). Why Kickstarter? Retrieved from https://www.kickstarter.com/blog/why-kickstarter
   Google Scholar
• Strickler, Y. (2011). Introducing curated pages. Retrieved from https://www.kickstarter.com/blog/introducing-curated-pages
   Google Scholar
• Strickler, Y., Chen, P., & Adler, C. (2015). Kickstarter is now a benefit corporation. Retrieved from https://www.kickstarter.com/blog/kickstarter-is-now-a-benefit-corporation
   Google Scholar
• Strover, S. (2014). The US digital divide: A call for a new philosophy. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 31(2), 114–122. doi: 10.1080/15295036.2014.922207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takhteyev, Y., Gruzd, A., & Wellman, B. (2012). Geography of Twitter networks. Social Networks, 34(1), 73–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verboord, M., & van Noord, S. (2016). The online place of popular music: Exploring the impact of geography and social media on pop artists’ mainstream media attention. Popular Communication, 14(2), 59–72. doi: 10.1080/15405702.2015.1019073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojan, T., & McGranahan, D. (2014). Number and percent employed in creative class occupations for all counties, 2007–11. Retrieved from http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/creative-class-county-codes.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, L., & Lerman, K. (2016). Attention inequality in social media. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.07200
   Google Scholar