Where ‘fake news’ flourishes: a comparison across four Western democracies

References

• Aalberg, T., & Curran, J. (2012). How media inform democracy. A comparative approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aalberg, T., Papathanassopoulos, S., Soroka, S., Curran, J., Hayashi, K., Iyengar, S., & Tiffen, R. (2013). International TV news, foreign affairs interest and public knowledge. Journalism Studies, 14(3), 387–406. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2013.765636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aalberg, T., van Aelst, P., & Curran, J. (2010). Media systems and the political information environment: A cross-national comparison. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 15(3), 255–271. doi: 10.1177/1940161210367422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. doi: 10.1257/jep.31.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. (2014). The media insight project. Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Barthel, M., Mitchell, A., & Holcomb, J. (2017). Many Americans believe fake news is sowing confusion. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, M. A., & Groeling, T. (2008). New media and the polarization of American political discourse. Political Communication, 25(4), 345–365. doi: 10.1080/10584600802426965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandtzaeg, P. B., & Følstad, A. (2017). Trust and distrust in online fact-checking services. Communications of the ACM, 60(9), 65–71. doi: 10.1145/3122803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brüggemann, M., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Humprecht, E., & Castro, L. (2014). Hallin and Mancini revisited: Four empirical types of Western media systems. Journal of Communication, 64(6), 1037–1065. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceron, A. (2015). Internet, news, and political trust: The difference between social media and online media outlets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(5), 487–503. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, C. J., Nam, Y., & Stefanone, M. A. (2012). Exploring online news credibility: The relative influence of traditional and technological factors. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(2), 171–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01565.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, J. I., Suman, M., Schramm, P., Zhou, L., & Reyes-Sepulveda, E. (2013). World internet project: International report. Los Angeles, CA. Retrieved from http://www.worldinternetproject.net/_files/_//307_2013worldinternetreport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Crepaz, M. M. L., & Lijphart, A. (2008). Trust beyond Borders. University of Michigan Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3998/mpub.133495
   Google Scholar
• de Vreese, C. H., Esser, F., & Hopmann, D. N. (2017). Comparing political journalism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Esser, F. (1999). ‘Tabloidization’ of news. A comparative analysis of Anglo-American and German press journalism. European Journal of Communication, 14(3), 291–324. doi: 10.1177/0267323199014003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esser, F., & Pfetsch, B. (2017). Comparing political communication : An update. In D. Caramani (Ed.), Comparative politics ( 4th updated ed., pp. 327–346). Oxford: Oxford University Press. .
   Google Scholar
• Esser, F., Stepinska, A., & Hopmann, D. N. (2017). Populism and the media: Cross-national findings and perspectives. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, & C. H. de Vreese (Eds.), Populist political communication in Europe (pp. 365–380). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Esser, F., & Umbricht, A. (2013). Competing models of journalism? Political affairs coverage in US, British, German, Swiss, French and Italian newspapers. Journalism, 14(8), 989–1007. doi: 10.1177/1464884913482551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., Cornia, A., Graves, L., & Nielsen, R. K. (2018). Measuring the reach of ‘fake news’ and online disinformation in Europe. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Zurich. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2018-01/Measuring the reach of fake news and online disinformation in Europe FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fridkin, K. L., & Kenney, P. J. (2012). The impact of negative campaigning on citizens’ actions and attitudes. In The SAGE handbook of political communication (pp. 174–185). doi: 10.4135/9781446201015.n15
   Google Scholar
• Gottfried, B. Y. J., & Shearer, E. (2016). News use across social media platforms 2016. Retrieved from http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2016/05/PJ_2016.05.26_social-media-and-news_FINAL-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Graves, L., & Cherubini, F. (2016). The rise of fact-checking sites in Europe. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, L., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2016). Understanding innovations in journalistic practice: A field experiment examining motivations for fact-checking. Journal of Communication, 66(1), 102–138. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenacre, M. (2017). Correspondence analysis in practice (3rd ed.). London: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems. Three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press.
   Google Scholar
• High Level Group on Fake News and Online Disinformation. (2018). A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation. Brussels. doi: 10.2759/0156
   Google Scholar
• Humprecht, E. (2016). Shaping online news performance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Humprecht, E., & Esser, F. (2017). Diversity in online news. Journalism Studies, 61(0), 1–23. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2017.1308229
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfs038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenssen, T. A., Aalberg, T., & Aarts, K. (2012). Informed citizens, media use, and public knowledge of parties policy positions. In J. Aalberg & T. Curran (Eds.), How media inform democracy: A comparative approach (pp. 138–158). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. A. (2004). Why Americans don’t trust the media: A preliminary analysis. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 9(2), 60–75. doi: 10.1177/1081180X04263461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladd, J. M. (2010). The role of media distrust in partisan voting. Political Behavior, 32(4), 567–585. doi: 10.1007/s11109-010-9123-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladd, J. M. (2011). Why Americans hate the media and how it matters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond misinformation : understanding and coping with the ‘post-truth’ era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muddiman, A., & Stroud, N. J. (2017). News values, cognitive biases, and partisan incivility in comment sections. Journal of Communication, 67, 586–609. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munzert, S., & Bauer, P. C. (2013). Political depolarization in German public opinion, 1980–2010. Political Science Research and Methods, 1(1), 67–89. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2013.7
   Google Scholar
• Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D. A. L., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017. Oxford. doi:10.1080/21670811.2012.744561
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
   Google Scholar
• Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2015). The effect of fact-checking on elites: A field experiment on U.S. state legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 628–640. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2017). Government at a glance 2017. Paris. doi: 10.1787/gov_glance-2011-en
   Google Scholar
• Pfetsch, B., & Esser, F. (2012). Comparing political communication. In F. Esser & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The handbook of comparative communication research (pp. 25–47). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, M., Sood, G., & Khanna, K. (2015). You cannot be serious: The impact of accuracy incentives on partisan bias in reports of economic perceptions. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10(4), 489–518. doi: 10.1561/100.00014127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robison, J., & Mullinix, K. J. (2015). Elite polarization and public opinion: How polarization is communicated and its effects. Political Communication, 4609, 1–22. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2015.1055526
   Google Scholar
• Ross, L., & Ward, A. (1996). Naive realism in everyday life: Implications for social confilct and misunderstanding. In E. S. Reed, E. Turiel, & T. Brown (Eds.), Values and Knowledge (pp. 103–135). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Schweiger, W. (2017). Der (des) informierte Bürger im Netz: Wie soziale Medien die Meinungsbildung verändern. doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-16058-6
   Google Scholar
• Scriber, B. (2016, September 8). Who decides what’s true in politics? A history of the rise of political fact-checking (pp. 1–7). Poynter. Retrieved from http://www.poynter.org/2016/who-decides-whats-true-in-politics-a-hist
   Google Scholar
• Shin, J., Jian, L., Driscoll, K., & Bar, F. (2016). Political rumoring on twitter during the 2012 US presidential election: Rumor diffusion and correction. New Media & Society, 19, 1–22. doi:10.1177/1461444816634054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, J., & Thorson, K. (2017). Partisan selective sharing: The biased diffusion of fact-checking messages on social media. Journal of Communication, 2012, 1–23. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12284
   Google Scholar
• Swire, B., Berinsky, A. J., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2017). Processing political misinformation: Comprehending the trump phenomenon. Royal Society Open Science, 4(3), 1–21. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandoc, E. C. J., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2017). Defining ‘fake news’. A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 811, 1–17. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
   Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2003). Do people watch what they do not trust? Exploring the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Communication Research, 30(5), 504–529. doi: 10.1177/0093650203253371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turcotte, J., York, C., Irving, J., Scholl, R. M., & Pingree, R. J. (2015). News recommendations from social media opinion leaders: Effects on media trust and information seeking. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(5), 520–535. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umbricht, A., & Esser, F. (2014). Changing political news? Long-term trends in American, British, French, Italian, German, and Swiss print media reporting. In R. Kuhn & R. K. Nielsen (Eds.), Political journalism in transition (pp. 195–218). London: I.B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Umbricht, A., & Esser, F. (2016). The push to popularize politics. Journalism Studies, 17(1), 100–121. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2014.963369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargo, C. J., Guo, L., & Amazeen, M. A. (2017). The agenda-setting power of fake news: A big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016. New Media & Society, 20, 2028–2049. doi: 10.1177/1461444817712086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making (Council of Europe Report No. DGI(2017)09). Strasbourg: Council of Europe Report.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J., Rojas, H., Wojcieszak, M., Coen, S., Curran, J., Iyengar, S., & Tiffen, R. (2016). Why are ‘others’ so polarized?: Perceived political polarization and media Use in 10 countries. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 21(5), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar