Affording choice: how website designs create and constrain ‘choice’

References

• Anderson, C. (2010). Free: How today’s smartest businesses profit by giving something for nothing. New York, NY: Hyperion.
   Google Scholar
• Blank, G. (2007). Critics, ratings, and society: The sociology of reviews. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Blank, G., & Reisdorf, B. (2012). The participatory web: A user perspective on Web 2.0. Information, Communication & Society, 15(4), 537–554. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.665935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. (2008a). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From production to produsage. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. (2008b). Reconfiguring television for a networked, produsage context. Media International Australia, Incorporating Culture & Policy, 126, 82–94. doi: 10.1177/1329878X0812600110
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A., & Schmidt, J. (2011). Produsage: A closer look at continuing developments. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 17(1), 3–7. doi: 10.1080/13614568.2011.563626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, L. (2011). Standards: Recipes for reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. (2010). Challenging choices: Ideology, consumerism and policy. Bristol: Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society (2nd ed.). California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. (2010). Between reason and experience: Essays in technology and modernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. In H. Dreyfus, & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Sussex: Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michele. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Brighton: Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2014). Digital prosumption labour on social media in the context of the capitalist regime of time. Time & Society, 23(1), 97–123. doi: 10.1177/0961463X13502117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, C. (1968). Do the poor pay more? Journal of Marketing, 32(1), 18–24. doi: 10.1177/002224296803200105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, Timothy. (2016). Technologies of choice: The shaping of choice on the World Wide Web. Brisbane, Australia: The University of Queensland. https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:409467
   Google Scholar
• Graham, Timothy. (2018). Platforms and hyper-choice on the World Wide Web. Big Data & Society, 5, 1. doi: 10.1177/2053951718765878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfield, K. (2011). The myth of choice: Personal responsibility in a world of limits. London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, L. (1986). Making up people. In T. Heller, D. Wellbery, & M. Sosna (Eds.), Reconstructing individualism (pp. 222–236). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hammon, L., & Hippner, H. (2012). Crowdsourcing. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 4(3), 163–166. doi: 10.1007/s12599-012-0215-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannak, A., Mislove, A., Soeller, G., Wilson, C., & Lazer, D. (2014). Measuring price discrimination and steering on e-commerce Web sites. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference. Paper presented at the Internet Measurement Conference 2014 (IMC ‘14), Vancouver, Canada (pp. 305–318). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).
   Google Scholar
• Henman, P. (1996). Constructing families and disciplining bodies: A socio-technical study of computers, policy and governance in Australia’s department of social security (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Queensland, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Henman, P. (2004). Targeted: Population segmentation, electronic surveillance and governing the unemployed in Australia. International Sociology, 19(2), 173–191. doi: 10.1177/0268580904042899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henman, P. (2007). Governing individuality. In C. Howard (Ed.), Contested individualization (pp. 171–185). New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Henman, P., & Dean, M. (2010). E-Government and the production of standardized individuality. In V. Higgins, S. Kitto, & W. Larner (Eds.), Calculating the social (pp. 77–93). Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Herlocker, J., Konstan, J., Terveen, L., & Riedl, J. (2004). Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 22(1), 5–53. doi: 10.1145/963770.963772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Introna, L. (2016). Algorithms, governance, and governmentality: On governing academic writing. Science Technology & Human Values, 41(1), 17–49. doi: 10.1177/0162243915587360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. (2011). The art of choosing. New York, NY: Twelve.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, T. (2011). Critique and experience in Foucault. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(4), 26–48. doi: 10.1177/0263276411404907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leotti, L., Iyengar, S., & Ochsner, K. (2010). Born to choose: The origins and value of the need for control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(10), 457–463. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luca, M., & Zervas, G. (2013). Fake it till you make it: Reputation, competition, and Yelp review fraud. Harvard Business School, Working Paper No. 14-006.
   Google Scholar
• PatientInfo. (2017). Pain (long-term and flare-up): Medication options. Retrieved from http://patient.info/decision-aids/pain-long-term-and-flare-up-medication-options
   Google Scholar
• Ritzer, G. (2015). Prosumer capitalism. The Sociological Quarterly, 56(3), 413–445. doi: 10.1111/tsq.12105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999a). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self (2nd ed.). London: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999b). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, E. (2005). The era of choice: The ability to choose and its transformation of contemporary life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salecl, R. (2011). The tyranny of choice. London: Profile.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B. (2005). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, S. V., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2012). Reconfiguring relations of accountability: Materialization of social media in the travel sector. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(1), 26–40. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2011.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations. New York, NY: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. Camberwell, Victoria: Penguin Group (Australia).
   Google Scholar
• Ziewitz, M. (2012). Evaluation as governance. The practical politics of reviewing, rating, and ranking on the web (Doctoral dissertation). University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Ziewitz, M. (2016). Governing algorithms: Myth, mess, and methods. Science Technology & Human Values, 41(1), 3–16. doi: 10.1177/0162243915608948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar