Civic laboratories: youth political expression in anonymous, ephemeral, geo-bounded social media

References

• Allen, D., & Light, J. S. (2015). From voice to influence: Understanding citizenship in a digital age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bayer, J. B., Ellison, N. B., Schoenebeck, S. Y., & Falk, E. B. (2015). Sharing the small moments: Ephemeral social interaction on Snapchat. Information, Communication & Society, 1–22. doi: 10.1080/1369118x.2015.1084349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., Wells, C., & Freelon, D. (2011). Communicating civic engagement: Contrasting models of citizenship in the youth Web sphere. Journal of Communication, 61, 835–856. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01588.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, E. W., Mezzina, K., & Thompson, L. A. (2016). Anonymous social media – understanding the content and context of Yik Yak. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 17–22. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleich, E., & Pekkanen, R. J. (2015). Data access, research transparency, and interviews: The interview methods appendix. Qualitative and Multi-Method Research: Newsletter of the American Political Science Association’s QMMR Section, 13, 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d., & Ellison, N. B. (2007).  Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D. (2008). Youth, identity, and digital media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, C. J., & Kahne, J. (2012). Participatory politics. New media and youth political action. Chicago, IL: MacArthur Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ekström, M. (2016). Young people’s everyday political talk: A social achievement of democratic engagement. Journal of Youth Studies, 19, 1–19. doi: 10.1080/13676261.2015.1048207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Blackwell, L., Lampe, C., & Trieu, P. (2016). ‘The question exists, but you don’t exist with it’: Strategic anonymity in the social lives of adolescents. Social Media+Society, 2. doi: 10.1177/2056305116670673
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22, 35–52. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• France, A. (2007). Understanding youth in late modernity. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Dallas, TX: Houghtom Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartocollis, A. (2016, December 8). On campus, Trump fans say they need ‘safe spaces.’ The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/08/us/politics/political-divide-on-campuses-hardens-after-trumps-victory.html
   Google Scholar
• Hemsley, J., & Eckert, J. (2014). Examining the role of ‘place’ in twitter networks through the lens of contentious politics. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 1844–1853). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/hicss.2014.233
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-C., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (2006). Civic engagement from a communication infrastructure perspective. Communication Theory, 16, 173–197. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00267.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2017). Alternative citizenship models: Contextualizing new media and the new ‘good citizen’. New Media & Society. doi: 10.1177/1461444817713742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koratana, A., Dredze, M., Chisolm, M. S., Johnson, M. W., & Paul, M. J. (2016). Studying anonymous health issues and substance use on college campuses with Yik Yak. In AAAI Workshop: WWW and population health intelligence. Palo Alto, California.
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E., & boyd, d. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13, 114–133. doi: 10.1177/1461444810365313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence a theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, I. (2015). Civility 2.0: A comparative analysis of incivility in online political discussion. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 121–138. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.940365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, A., Chandrasekharan, E., Masden, C. A., Bruckman, A. S., Edwards, W. K., & Grinter, R. E. (2017). Situated anonymity: Impacts of anonymity, ephemerality, and hyper-locality on social media. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 6912–6924). ACM. doi: 10.1145/3025453.3025682
   Google Scholar
• Smerch, H. (2014, October 5). An interview with the founders of Yik Yak. Retrieved from http://theodysseyonline.com/illinois/interview-founders-yik-yak/67942
   Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J., Bryant, L., & Bimber, B. (2015). Context and medium matter: Expressing disagreements online and face-to-face in political deliberations. Journal of Public Deliberation, 11, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 321–326. doi: 10.1089/1094931041291295
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanis, M., & Postmes, T. (2007). Two faces of anonymity: Paradoxical effects of cues to identity in CMC. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 955–970. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2005.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson, K. (2013). Facing an uncertain reception: Young citizens and political interaction on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 203–216. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.862563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson, K. (2014). Sampling from the civic buffet: Youth, new media, and do-it-yourself citizenship. In H. Gil de Zuniga (Ed.), New technologies & civic engagement: New agendas in communication series (pp. 3–22). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thorson, K., Vraga, E. K., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2014). Don’t push your opinions on me: Young citizens and political etiquette on Facebook. In J. A. Hendricks & D. Schill (Eds.), Presidential campaigning and social media: An analysis of the 2012 campaign (pp. 74–93). Boulder, CO: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thorson, K., Xu, Y., & Edgerly, S. (2017). Political inequalities start at home: Parents, children, and the socialization of civic infrastructure Online. Political Communication, 0, 1–18. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2017.1333550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripodi, F. (2016). Yakking about college life: Examining the role of anonymous forums on community identity formation. In Digital sociologies. doi: 10.2307/j.ctt1t89cfr.22
   Google Scholar
• Waddell, T. F. (2016). The allure of privacy or the desire for self-expression? Identifying users’ gratifications for ephemeral, photograph-based communication. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19, 441–445. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2015.0677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. (1996). What should we expect from more democracy? Radically democratic responses to politics. Political Theory, 24, 241–270. doi: 10.1177/0090591796024002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, E. C. (2014). The personal is political on social media: Online civic expression patterns and pathways among civically engaged youth. International Journal of Communication, 8(24), 210–233.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, C. (2015). The civic organization and the digital citizen: Communicating engagement in a networked age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. (2012). From ‘third place’ to ‘third space’: Everyday political talk in non-political online spaces. Javnost – The Public, 19(3), 5–20. doi: 10.1080/13183222.2012.11009088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S., Graham, T., & Jackson, D. (2016). Third space, social media and everyday political talk. The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 74–88). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S., & Street, J. (2007). Democracy, deliberation and design: The case of online discussion forums. New Media & Society, 9, 849–869. doi: 10.1177/1461444807081230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xenos, M., Vromen, A., & Loader, B. D. (2014). The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 151–167. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.871318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, B., Chang, P., Welker, C. L., Bazarova, N. N., & Cosley, D. (2016). Automatic archiving versus default deletion: What Snapchat tells us about ephemerality in design. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 1662–1675). New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2818048.2819948
   Google Scholar
• Yik Yak | Crunchbase. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.crunchbase.com/organization/yik-yak#section-overview
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, E. (2014). New media, new civics? Policy and Internet, 6(2), 151–168. doi: 10.1002/1944-2866.POI360
   Google Scholar