The social shaping of media technologies’ multiple uses: the case of Mídia NINJA in Brazil

References

• Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In B. Wiebe, E. Bijker, & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society. Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205–224). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atton, C. (2002). Alternative media. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Barbrook, R., & Cameron, A. (1996). The Californian ideology. Science as Culture, 6(1), 44–72. doi: 10.1080/09505439609526455
   Google Scholar
• Becerra, M., & Mastrini, G. (2008). Los dueños del poder. Acceso, estructura y concentración de los medios en la América Latina del Siglo XXI [The owners of power. Access, structure and concentration of media in 21st Century Latin America]. Buenos Aires, AR: Prometeo Libros.
   Google Scholar
• Benevenuto Jr., Á. (2005). Comunitário: um peixe vivo, mas fora da rede [Community media: A live fish but out of the net]. In V. C. Brittos, & C. R. S. Bolaño (Eds.), Rede Globo. 40 anos de poder e hegemonia [Globo network: 40 years of power and hegemony] (pp. 225–242). São Paulo, BR: Paulus.
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. E. (1995). Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boczkowski, P., & Lievrouw, L. A. (2008). Bridging STS and communication studies_ scholarship on media and information technologies. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (3rd ed., pp. 951–977). London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boczkowski, P., & Siles, I. (2014). Steps toward cosmopolitanism in the study of media technologies. Information, Communication & Society, 17(5), 560–571. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.808358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolaño, C. R. S. (2007). Qual a lógica das políticas de comunicação no Brasil? [What is the logic of communication policies in Brazil?]. São Paulo, BR: Paulus.
   Google Scholar
• Carpentier, N. (2011). Media and participation. Bristol: Intellect Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Colbjørnsen, T. (2015). Digital divergence: Analysis strategy, interpretation and controversy in the case of the introduction of an ebook reader technology. Information, Communication & Society, 18(1), 32–47. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.924982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couldry, N. (2008). Actor network theory and media: Do they connect and on what terms? In A. Hepp, F. Krotz, S. Moores, & C. Winter (Eds.), Connectivity, networks and flows: Conceptualizing contemporary communications (pp. 93–110). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• De Lima, V. A. (2005). Globo e política: ‘tudo a ver’ [Globe and politics: Everything to see]. In V. C. Brittos & C. R. S. Bolaño (Eds.), Rede Globo. 40 anos de poder e hegemonia [Globo network: 40 years of power and hegemony] (pp. 103–129). São Paulo, BR: Paulus.
   Google Scholar
• Donos da Mídia. (2016, April 28). As redes de TV [TV networks]. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20160428160632/http://donosdamidia.com.br:80/redes/tv.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, T. (2010). Políticas para a cultura digital [Policies for digital culture]. In A. A. C. Rubim (Ed.), Políticas culturais no governo Lula [Cultural policies during Lula’s administration] (pp. 159–178). Salvador de Bahia, BR: EDUFBA.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrara, E., Varol, O., Davis, C., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2016). The rise of social bots. Communications of the ACM, 59(7), 96–104. doi: 10.1145/2818717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fora do Eixo. (2013). Glossário Fora do Eixês. Retrieved from http://foradoeixo.org.br/glossario-fora-do-eixes/
   Google Scholar
• Garland, S. (2012). ‘The space, the gear, and two big cans of beer’: Fora do Eixo and the debate over circulation, remuneration, and aesthetics in the Brazilian alternative market. Journal of Popular Music Studies, 24(4), 509–531. doi: 10.1111/jpms.12005
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, A. (2017). Radical technologies: The design of everyday life. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems. Three models of media and politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanitzsch, T., Hanusch, F., Mellado, C., Anikina, M., Berganza, R., Cangoz, I., … Yuen, E. K. W. (2011). Mapping journalism cultures across nations: A comparative study of 18 countries. Journalism Studies, 12(3), 273–293. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2010.512502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, P. N., & Hussain, M. (2011). The upheavals in Egypt and Tunisia: The role of digital media. Journal of Democracy, 22(3), 35–48. doi: 10.1353/jod.2011.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, R. (2013). Doing discourse research. An introduction for social scientists. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Klausen, J. (2015). Tweeting the Jihad: Social media networks of Western foreign fighters in Syria and Iraq. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 38(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1080/1057610X.2014.974948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R., & Pinch, T. (1996). Users as agents of technological change: The social construction of the automobile in the rural United States. Technology and Culture, 37(4), 763–795. doi: 10.2307/3107097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. E. Bijker, & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society. Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225–258). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. An introduction to Actor-Network Theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality. Information and Organization, 23(2), 59–76. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matos, C. (2012). Media democratization in Brazil: Achievements and future challenges. Critical Sociology, 38(6), 863–876. doi: 10.1177/0896920512441636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattos, S. (2005). As organizações globo na mídia impressa [Print media and Globo]. In Rede Globo. 40 anos de poder e hegemonia [Globo network: 40 years of power and hegemony] (pp. 267–286). São Paulo, BR: Paulus.
   Google Scholar
• McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail’s mass communication theory (6th ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Milan, S. (2015). From social movements to cloud protesting: The evolution of collective identity. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 887–900. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministério da Cultura. (2005). Cultura Viva. Programa Nacional de Arte, Educação, Cidadania e Economia Solidária [Living culture. National Program of Art, Education, Citizenship and Solidarity Economy] (p. 88). Brasília, BR: Ministério da Cultura.
   Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. (2011). The dark side of internet freedom. The net delusion. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448. doi: 10.1177/0170840607081138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. (2007). User-technology relationships: Some recent developments. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (3rd ed., pp. 541–566). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinch, T., & Bijker, W. E. (2012). The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other? In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems (Anniversary ed., pp. 11–44). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos, M. C. (2005). A força de um aparelho privado de hegemonia [The strength of a private apparatus of hegemony]. In V. C. Brittos, & C. R. S. Bolaño (Eds.), Rede Globo. 40 anos de poder e hegemonia [Globo network: 40 years of power and hegemony] (pp. 57–76). São Paulo, BR: Paulus.
   Google Scholar
• Saad-Filho, A. (2013). Mass protests under ‘left neoliberalism’: Brazil, June-July 2013. Critical Sociology, 39(5), 657–669. doi: 10.1177/0896920513501906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, R. (2018). Towards a theory of digital media. Information, Communication & Society, 21(3), 323–339. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1289231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siles, I., & Boczkowski, P. (2012). At the intersection of content and materiality: A texto-material perspective on the use of media technologies. Communication Theory, 22(3), 227–249. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01408.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sismondo, S. (2010). An introduction to science and technology studies (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Skidmore, T. E. (1999). Brazil: Five centuries of change. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Cuilenburg, J., & McQuail, D. (2003). Media policy paradigm shifts. Towards a new communications policy paradigm. European Journal of Communication, 18(2), 181–207. doi: 10.1177/0267323103018002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeek, P.-P. (2006). Materializing morality: Design ethics and technological mediation. Science, Technology & Human Values, 31(3), 361–380. doi: 10.1177/0162243905285847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vila Seoane, M. (2017). Cultura viva, a challenge to the creative economy policy discourse in Brazil. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 36(4), 424–439. doi: 10.1111/blar.12637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waisbord, S., & Mellado, C. (2014). De-westernizing communication studies: A reassessment. Communication Theory, 24(4), 361–372. doi: 10.1111/comt.12044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz, M. (2005). Alternative and activist media. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Youmans, W. L., & York, J. C. (2012). Social media and the activist toolkit: User agreements, corporate interests, and the information infrastructure of modern social movements. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 315–329. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01636.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar