Online censorship and digital surveillance: the relationship between suppression technologies and democratization across countries

References

• Åström, J., Karlsson, M., Linde, J., & Pirannejad, A. (2012). Understanding the rise of e-participation in non-democracies: Domestic and international factors. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 142–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailard, C. S. (2012). Testing the internet’s effect on democratic satisfaction: A multi-methodological, cross-national approach. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9(2), 185–204.
   Google Scholar
• Balkin, J. M. (2008). The constitution in the national surveillance state. Minnesota Law Review, 93(1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrouzian, G., Nisbet, E. C., Dal, A., & Carkoglu, A. (2016). Resisting censorship: How citizens navigate closed media environments. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4345–4367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal, P. (2016). Data gathering, surveillance and human rights: Recasting the debate. Journal of Cyber Policy, 1(2), 243–264.
   Google Scholar
• Best, M. L., & Wade, K. W. (2009). The internet and democracy: Global catalyst or democratic dud? Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 29(4), 255–271.
   Google Scholar
• Bimber, B. (2017). Three prompts for collective action in the context of digital media. Political Communication, 34(1), 6–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botsman, R. (2017, October 21). Big data meets Big Brother as China moves to rate its citizens. Wired. Retrieved from: http://www.wired.co.uk/article/chinese-government-social-credit-score-privacy-invasion
   Google Scholar
• Boulianne, S. (2009). Does internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26(2), 193–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulianne, S. (2011). Stimulating or reinforcing political interest: Using panel data to examine reciprocal effects between news media and political interest. Political Communication, 28(2), 147–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breuer, A., & Groshek, J. (2014). Online media and offline empowerment in post-rebellion Tunisia: An analysis of internet use during democratic transition. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(1), 25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Burkhart, R. E., & Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1994). Comparative democracy: The economic development thesis. American Political Science Review, 88(4), 903–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, A., Theiner, P., & Breindl, Y. (2017). Internet censorship in liberal democracies: Learning from autocracies? In J. Schwanholz, T. Graham, & P. T. Stoll (Eds.), Managing democracy in the digital age (pp. 11–28). Cambridge, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. (2010). Liberation technology. Journal of Democracy, 21(3), 69–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinev, T., Bellotto, M., Hart, P., Russo, V., & Serra, I. (2006). Internet users’ privacy concerns and beliefs about government surveillance: An exploratory study of differences between Italy and the United States. Journal of Global Information Management, 14(4), 57–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djankov, S., Nenova, T., McLiesh, C., & Shleifer, A. (2003). Who owns the media? Journal of Law and Economics, 46, 341–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, L. E. (2012). The psychology of collective action. In K. Deaux, & M. Snyder (Eds.), Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 781–803). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faris, R., & Villeneuve, N. (2008). Measuring global internet filtering. In R. Deibert, J. Palfrey, R. Rohozinski, & J. Zittrain (Eds.), Access denied: The practice and policy of global internet filtering (information revolution and global politics) (pp. 5–28). Cambridge, MA: The President and Fellow of Harvard College.
   Google Scholar
• Freedom House. (2015). Freedom on the Net 2015: Privatizing censorship, eroding privacy. Retrieved from: https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/FOTN20201520Full%20Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gainutdinov, D. (2017, November 27). Surveillance in Russia. Intersection Project. Retrieved from http://intersectionproject.eu/article/politics/surveillance-russia
   Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Puig-i-Abril, E., & Rojas, H. (2009). Weblogs, traditional sources online and political participation: An assessment of how the Internet is changing the political environment. New Media & Society, 11(4), 553–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Google Transparency Report. (2017). Retrieved from https://transparencyreport.google.com/
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, G. (2014). No place to hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. surveillance state. New York: Metropolitan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Groshek, J. (2009). The democratic effects of the internet, 1994–2003: A cross-national inquiry of 152 countries. International Communication Gazette, 71(3), 115–136.
   Google Scholar
• Groshek, J. (2010). A time-series, multinational analysis of democratic forecasts and internet diffusion. International Journal of Communication, 4, 142–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, T. M., & Sayogo, D. S. (2014). Transparency, participation, and accountability practices in open government: A comparative study. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 513–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinnebusch, R. (2006). Authoritarian persistence, democratization theory and the Middle East: An overview and critique. Democratization, 13(3), 373–395.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, P. N., Agarwal, S. D., & Hussain, M. M. (2011). When do states disconnect their digital networks? Regime responses to the political uses of social media. The Communication Review, 14(3), 216–232.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, R., & Sun, X. (2014). Weibo network, information diffusion and implications for collective action in China. Information, Communication & Society, 17(1), 86–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, E., Rueschemeyer, D., & Stephens, J. D. (1993). The impact of economic development on democracy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(3), 71–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch. (2017). Human rights watch world report: Events of 2016. Retrieved from https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/world_report_download/wr2017-web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jho, W., & Song, K. J. (2015). Institutional and technological determinants of civil e-Participation: Solo or duet? Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 488–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanaugh, A., Kim, B. J., Perez-Quinones, M. A., Schmitz, J., & Isenhour, P. (2008). Net gains in political participation: Secondary effects of Internet on community. Information, Communication & Society, 11(7), 933–963.
   Google Scholar
• King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. (2013). How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review, 107(2), 326–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. (2014). Reverse-engineering censorship in China: Randomized experimentation and participant observation. Science, 345(6199), 1251722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, R. (2011). China’s “networked authoritarianism”. Journal of Democracy, 22(2), 32–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, R. (2012). Consent of the networked: The worldwide struggle for internet freedom. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Malsin, J. (2018, May 7). Egyptian bill on ride-hailing data prompts privacy concerns. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/egyptian-bill-on-ride-hailing-data-prompts-privacy-concerns-1525721830
   Google Scholar
• Marder, B., Joinson, A., Shankar, A., & Houghton, D. (2016). The extended ‘chilling’ effect of Facebook: The cold reality of ubiquitous social networking. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 582–592. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mays, K., & Groshek, J. (2017). A time-series multinational analysis of democratic forecasts and emerging media diffusion, 1994–2014. International Journal of Communication, 11, 429–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meserve, S. A., & Pemstein, D. (2018). Google politics: The political determinants of internet censorship in democracies. Political Science Research and Methods, 6(2), 245–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2007). Digital citizenship: The internet, society, and participation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mou, Y., Atkin, D., & Fu, H. (2011). Predicting political discussion in a censored virtual environment. Political Communication, 28(3), 341–356. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2011.572466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, T. (2012). Dual effects of the internet on political activism: Reinforcing and mobilizing. Government Information Quarterly, 29, S90–S97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, E. C., Kamenchuk, O., & Dal, A. (2017). A psychological firewall? Risk perceptions and public support for online censorship in Russia. Social Science Quarterly, 98(3), 958–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, E. C., Stoycheff, E., & Pearce, K. E. (2012). Internet use and democratic demands: A multinational, multilevel model of internet use and citizen attitudes about democracy. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 249–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2008). Driving democracy: Do power-sharing institutions work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society, 4(1), 9–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2004). Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media & Society, 6(2), 259–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penney, J. W. (2016). Chilling effects: Online surveillance and Wikipedia use. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 31(1), 117–182.
   Google Scholar
• Penney, J. W. (2017). Internet surveillance, regulation, and chilling effects online: A comparative case study. Internet Policy Review, 6(2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, B., Strömberg, D., & Wu, Y. (2017). Why does China allow freer social media? Protests versus surveillance and propaganda. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(1), 117–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, S., & Henschke, A. (2017). The value of transparency: Bulk data and authoritarianism. Surveillance & Society, 15(3–4), 582–589.
   Google Scholar
• Rød, E. G., & Weidmann, N. B. (2015). Empowering activists or autocrats? The internet in authoritarian regimes. Journal of Peace Research, 52(3), 338–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schauer, F. (1978). Fear, risk, and the First Amendment: Unraveling the “chilling effect”. Boston University Law Review, 58, 685–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneier, B. (2015). Data and goliath: The hidden battles to collect your data and control your world. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Shahin, S., & Zheng, P. (2018). Big data and the illusion of choice: Comparing the evolution of India’s Aadhaar and China’s social credit system as technosocial discourses. Social Science Computer Review.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, F. (2017). Internet use, freedom supply, and demand for internet freedom: A cross-national study of 20 countries. International Journal of Communication, 11, 2093–2114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirazi, F., Ngwenyama, O., & Morawczynski, O. (2010). ICT expansion and the digital divide in democratic freedoms: An analysis of the impact of ICT expansion, education and ICT filtering on democracy. Telematics and Informatics, 27, 21–31.
   Google Scholar
• Soldatov, A., & Borogan, I. (2011). Russia’s very secret services. World Policy Journal, 28(1), 83–91.
   Google Scholar
• Stoycheff, E. (2016). Under surveillance: Examining Facebook’s spiral of silence effects in the wake of NSA internet monitoring. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(2), 296–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoycheff, E., Liu, J., Xu, K., & Wibowo, K. (2018). Privacy and the panopticon: Online mass surveillance’s deterrence and chilling effects. New Media & Society. doi: 10.1177/1461444818801317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoycheff, E., & Nisbet, E. C. (2014). What’s the bandwidth for democracy? Deconstructing internet penetration and citizen attitudes about governance. Political Communication, 31(4), 628–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoycheff, E., Nisbet, E. C., & Epstein, D. (2016). Differential effects of capital-enhancing and recreational internet use on citizens’ demand for democracy. Communication Research.
   Google Scholar
• Stoycheff, E., Wibowo, K. A., Liu, J., & Xu, K. (2017). Online surveillance’s effect on support for other extraordinary measures to prevent terrorism. Mass Communication and Society, 20(6), 784–799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timm, T., & York, J. C. (2012, March 6). Surveillance Inc: How Western tech firms are helping Arab dictators. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/03/surveillance-inc-how-western-tech-firms-are-helping-arab-dictators/254008/
   Google Scholar
• Toepfl, F. (2018). From connective to collective action: Internet elections as a digital tool to centralize and formalize protest in Russia. Information, Communication & Society, 21(4), 531–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2003). Unraveling the effects of the Internet on political participation? Political Research Quarterly, 56(2), 175–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z., & Wilson, C. (2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication, 62, 363–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C. (2017). Online mobilization in comparative perspective: Digital appeals and political engagement in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. Political Communication, 34, 69–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Laer, J., & Van Aelst, P. (2010). Internet and social movement action repertoires: Opportunities and limitations. Information, Communication & Society, 13(8), 1146–1171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas-Leon, P. (2016). Tracking internet shutdown practices: Democracies and hybrid regimes. In F. Musiani, D. L. Cogburn, L. DeNardis, & N. S. Levinson (Eds.), The turn to infrastructure in internet governance. Information technology and global governance (pp. 167–188). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Vegh, S. (2003). Classifying forms of online activism: The case of cyberprotests against the World Bank. In Martha McCaughey, & Michael D. Ayers (Eds.), Cyberactivism: Online activism and theory and practice (pp. 71–95). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Warf, B. (2011). Geographies of global internet censorship. GeoJournal, 76, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Weidmann, N. B., Benitez-Baleato, S., Hunziker, P., Glatz, E., & Dimitropoulos, X. (2016). Digital discrimination: Political bias in internet service provision across ethnic groups. Science, 353(6304), 1151–1155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woltman, H., Feldstain, A., MacKay, J. C., & Rocchi, M. (2012). An introduction to hierarchical linear modeling. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 52–69.
   Google Scholar