A ‘Tripadvisor’ for disability? Social enterprise and ‘digital disruption’ in Australia

References

• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2012). Disability, ageing and carers, Australia: Summary of findings (cat no 4430.0). Canberra: Australian Commonwealth Government.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Productivity Commission. (2011). Disability care support (Productivity Commission Inquiry Report, 54 (1 & 2)). Canberra: Australian.
   Google Scholar
• Barraket, J. (2016). The state of social enterprise in Australia. Third Sector Review, 22(2), 71–79.
   Google Scholar
• Barraket, J., Mason, C., & Blain, B. (2016). June). finding Australia’s social enterprise sector. Hawthorn: Centre for Social Impact Swinburne, Swinburne University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonyhady, B. (2016, August 8). What will inclusion look like for people with disability in 10 years’ time?. Speech to the Griffith NDIS Symposium, Brisbane. Retrieved from https://www.ndis.gov.au/news/media/speeches/Bruce-Bonyhady-Speech-What-will-inclusion-look-like-for-people-with-disability-in-10-years
   Google Scholar
• Botsman, R. (2011). What's mine is yours: How collaborative consumption is changing the way we live. London: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Bria, F., Almirall, E., Gascó, M., Baeck, P., Halpin, H., & Kresin, F. (2014). Digital social innovation (Interim Report). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Castellas, E., Barraket, J., Hiruy, K., & Suchowerska, R. (2017, November). Map for impact: The Victorian social enterprise mapping project. Melbourne: Swinburne Centre for Social Impact, Swinburne University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M., Grossman, J. H., & Hwang, J. (2009). The innovator’s prescription: A disruptive solution for health care. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M., Hatkoff, C., & Kula, I. (2013). Disruptive innovation theory revisited: Toward quantum innovation. The Off-White Papers, p. 21. Available from: http://offwhitepapers.com/?p = 21
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M. E., & McDonald, R. (2015). What is disruptive innovation? Harvard Business Review, 93(12), 44–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Codagnone, C., Biagi, F., & Abadie, F. (2016). The passions and the interests: Unpacking the ‘sharing economy’ (JRC Science for Policy Report). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Competition and Markets Authority (CMA – UK). (2015, June). Online reviews and endorsements: Report on the CMA’s call for information (Report No. CMA41).
   Google Scholar
• Desouza, K. C., & Smith, K. L. (2013). Big Data for social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Summer, pp. 38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Einav, L., Farronato, C., & Levin, J. (2016). Peer-to-Peer markets. Annual Review of Economics, 8, 615–635. doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, B., & Plath, D. (2014). A national disability insurance scheme: What social work has to offer. British Journal of Social Work, 44, 747–762. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, K., Gleeson, R., Edwards, R., Purcel, C., Sitek, T., Dinning, B., … Thompson, D. (2010). Effectiveness of individual funding approaches for disability support. Canberra: Australian Government, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Fotaki, M., Roland, M., McDonald, R., Scheaf, R., Boyd, A., & Smith, L. (2008). What benefits will choice bring to patients? Literature review and assessment of implications. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 13(3), 178–184. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.007163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glucksmann, M. A. (1995). Why ‘work’? Gender and the ‘total social organization of labour’. Gender, Work & Organization, 2(2), 63–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.1995.tb00028.x
   Google Scholar
• Hira, A., & Reilly, K. (2017). The emergence of the sharing economy: Implications for development. Journal of Developing Societies, 33(2), 175–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, E. C. (1951). Mistakes at work. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 17(3), 320–327. doi: 10.2307/137687
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, K. (2016). Digital social innovation in Australia. Paper presented at the Social Enterprise Research Colloquium Australasia, Swinburne University, Hawthorn.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, J., & Christensen, C. M. (2012). Disruptive innovation in health care delivery: A framework for business model innovation’. Health Affairs, 27(5), 1329–1335. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.5.1329
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J., Nansen, B., Meese, J., Wilken, R., Kohn, T., & Arnold, M. (2017). Mapping the Melbourne sharing economy (University of Melbourne Networked Society Institute Research Paper, 5).
   Google Scholar
• Lepore, J. (2014, June 23). The disruption machine: What the gospel of innovation gets wrong. The New Yorker.
   Google Scholar
• Lober, W. B., & Flowers, J. L. (2011). Consumer empowerment in health care amid the internet and social media. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 27(3), 169–182. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2011.04.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mansell, J. (2015, April). Handing back the social commons (A report to the New Zealand Productivity Commission). Wellington.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, C., Barraket, J., Friel, S., O'Rourke, K., & Stenta, C.-P. (2015). Social innovation for the promotion of health equity. Health Promotion International, 30(S2), ii116–ii125. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dav076
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McLoughlin, I. P., Bayati-Bojakhi, S., Purushothaman, K., & Sohal, A. (2014). Informational requirements and client-centred disability care: Issues, problems and prospects in Australia. Social Policy and Society, 13(4), 609–621. doi: 10.1017/S1474746414000268
   Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, I. P., Garetty, K., & Wilson, R. (2017). The digitalization of healthcare: Electronic records and the disruption of moral orders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Disability Insurance Service. (2016, December). Choice and control. Geelong: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Disability Services. (2018, September). The state of the disability sector report. Canberra: NDS.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, A., & Murdock, A. (2012). The nature of social innovation. In A. Nicholls, & A. Murdock (Eds.), Social innovation: Blurring boundaries to reconfigure markets (pp. 1–30). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (1992). Changing the social relations of research production? Disability, Handicap & Society, 7(2), 101–114. doi: 10.1080/02674649266780141
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, S. (2016, October 6). How the disability sector is being uberised. Australian Financial Review. Retrieved from http://www.afr.com
   Google Scholar
• Probyn, A. (2017, September 21). NDIS’ virtual assistant Nadia, voiced by Cate Blanchett, stalls after recent census, robo-debt bungles. Australian Broadcasting Commission News. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au
   Google Scholar
• PwC. (2016, August). National Disability Insurance Scheme MyPlace portal implementation review (Final Report). Author.
   Google Scholar
• Sammut, J. (2017, March). Real choice for ageing Australians: Achieving the benefits of the consumer-directed Aged Care Reforms in the new economy (Research Report). The Centre for Independent Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Selloni, D. (2017). Codesign for public-interest services. Research for development series. Amsterdam: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. (2006). The social model of disability. The Disability Studies Reader, 2, 197–204.
   Google Scholar
• Slee, T. (2017). What’s yours is mine: Against the sharing economy. Brunswick: Scribe.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, E., & Priestley, M. (1996). Parasites, pawns and partners: Disability research and the role of non-disabled researchers. British Journal of Sociology, 47(4), 699–716. doi: 10.2307/591081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigg, L. (2014). Using online reviews in social care. Social Policy & Administration, 48(3), 361–378. doi: 10.1111/spol.12017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van De Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organisational and social researchers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warr, D., Dickinson, H., Olney, S., Hargrave, J., Karanikolas, A., Kasidis, V., … Wilcox, M. (2017). Choice, control and the NDIS: Service users’ perspectives on having choice and control in the new national disability insurance scheme. Carlton: University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Whalan, A., Acton, P., & Harmer, J. (2014). A review of the capabilities of the national disability insurance agency. Geelong: National Disability Insurance Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R., Baines, S., Martin, M., Richter, P., McLoughlin, I. P., & Maniatopoulos, G. (2017). Who is telecaring whom? Exploring the total social organisation of care work in an Italian municipality. New Technology Work and Employment, 32(3), 268–282. doi: 10.1111/ntwe.12101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R., Maniatopoulos, G., Martin, M., & McLoughlin, I. P. (2012). Innovating relationships: Taking a co-productive approach to the shaping of telecare services for older people. Information, Communication & Society, 15(7), 1136–1163. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.711845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojtak, A., & Stark, L. (2016). “Uberizing” home care in Ontario. Healthcare Management Forum, 29(4), 149–152. doi: 10.1177/0840470416642772
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wulff, M. (2017). Startup muster 2017 annual report. Startup Muster https://www.startupmuster.com/reports/Startup-Muster-2018-Report.pdf?key=b166de31b2c8140cf029e7e7d7449288a01d870eaffd48a0e40b146f788b5e60
   Google Scholar
• Yates, S., & Alford, J. (2016). The national disability insurance agency, case study no. 2016-188.1, ANZSOG case program. Melbourne: Australia and New Zealand School.
   Google Scholar