1,675
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Political hashtag publics and counter-visuality: a case study of #fertilityday in Italy

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 1235-1254 | Received 12 Jul 2018, Accepted 23 Nov 2018, Published online: 11 Dec 2018

References

  • Abercrombie, N., & Longhurst, B. (1998). Audiences. A sociological theory of performance and imagination. London: Sage.
  • Barnidge, M. (2016). Exposure to political disagreement in social media versus face-to-face and anonymous online settings. Political Communication, 34(2), 302–321.
  • Bastos, M., Raimundo, R., & Travitzki, R. (2013). Gatekeeping Twitter: Message diffusion in political hashtags. Media, Culture & Society, 35, 260–270.
  • Bell, P. (2001). Content analysis of visual images. In T. van Leeuwen, & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 10–34). London: Sage.
  • Benkler, Y., Roberts, H., Faris, R., Solow-Niederman, A., & Etling, B. (2015). Social mobilization and the networked public sphere: Mapping the SOPA-PIPA debate. Political Communication, 32(4), 594–624.
  • Bennett, W. L. (2003). Communicating global activism: Strengths and vulnerabilities of networked politics. Information, Communication & Society, 6, 143–168.
  • Bennett, W. L., Segerberg, A., & Walker, S. (2014). Organization in the crowd: Peer production in large–scale networked protests. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 232–260.
  • boyd, d. ((2010)). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), Networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). London/NewYork: Routledge.
  • Bruns, A. (2005). Gatewatching: Collaborative online news production. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2011). The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. In Proceedings of the 6th European Consortium for political research (ECPR) general conference 2011. Reykjavik: University of Iceland. Retrieved from https://eprints.qut.edu.au/46515/1/The_Use_of_Twitter_Hashtags_in_the_Formation_of_Ad_Hoc_Publics_28final29.pdf
  • Bruns, A., & Highfield, T. (2016). Is Habermas on Twitter? Social media and the public sphere. In A. Bruns, G. Enli, E. Skogerbø, A. Larsson, & C. Christensen (Eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 56–73). New York: Routledge.
  • Bruns, A., Moon, B., Paul, A., & Münch, F. (2016). Towards a typology of hashtag publics: A large-scale comparative study of user engagement across trending topics. Communication Research and Practice, 2, 20–46.
  • Bruns, A., & Stieglitz, S. (2012). Quantitative approaches to comparing communication patterns on Twitter. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 30, 160–185.
  • Cammaerts, B. (2007). Jamming the political: Beyond counter-hegemonic practices. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 21, 71–90.
  • Carpentier, N. (2011). Media and participation: A site of ideological democratic struggle. Bristol: Intellect.
  • Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Coppolaro-Nowell. (2016, September 5). Italy’s fertility day posters aren’t just sexist – they’re echoes of a fascist past. The Guardian. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/sep/05/italys-fertility-day-posters-sexist-echoes-of-fascist-past
  • Dahlgren, P. (2006). The internet, public spheres, and political sommunication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147–162.
  • De Cock, B., & Pizarro Pedraza, A. (2018). From expressing solidarity to mocking on Twitter: Pragmatic functions of hashtags starting with #jesuis across languages. Language in Society, 47(2), 197–217.
  • Dery, M. (1993). Culture jamming: Hacking, slashing and sniping in the empire of signs. Westfield, NJ: Open Magazine pamphlet series (Vol. 25).
  • Deuze, M. (2010). Survival of the mediated. Journal of Cultural Science, 3, 1–11.
  • Fiske, J. (1992). Audiencing: A cultural studies approach to watching television. Poetics, 21(4), 345–359.
  • Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 56–80.
  • Frazer, R., & Carlson, B. (2017). Indigenous memes and the invention of a people. Social Media + Society, 3(4), 1–12.
  • Fuchs, C. (2014). Social media: A critical introduction. London: Sage.
  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self identity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Giglietto, F., & Lee, Y. (2017). A hashtag worth a thousand words: Discursive strategies around #JeNeSuisPasCharlie after the 2015 Charlie Hebdo shooting. Social Media + Society, 3(1), 1–15.
  • Gray, J. (2012). Of snowspeeders and imperial walkers: Fannish play at the Wisconsin protests. Transformative Works and Cultures, 10), Retrieved from https://journal.transformativeworks.org/index.php/twc/article/view/353/296
  • Habermas, J. (1962). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Hermida, A. (2015). Power plays on social media. Social Media + Society, 1(1), 1–2.
  • Iannelli, L. (2016). Hybrid politics. Media and participation. London: Sage.
  • Iannelli, L., & Giglietto, F. (2015). Hybrid spaces of politics: The 2013 general elections in Italy, between talk shows and Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 1006–1021.
  • Il Tempo. (2016, August 31). Il Fertility Day della Lorenzin fa esplodere la polemica [Lorenzin’s Fertility Day blows the debate].Retrieved from: http://www.iltempo.it/politica/2016/08/31/gallery/il-fertility-day-della-lorenzin-fa-esplodere-la-polemica-1018525/
  • Jackson, S. J., & Foucault Welles, B. (2015). Hijacking #myNYPD: Social media dissent and networked counterpublics. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 932–952.
  • Jackson, S. J., & Foucault Welles, B. (2016). #Ferguson is everywhere: Initiators in emerging counterpublic networks. Information, Communication & Society, 19(3), 397–418.
  • Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and poetics. In T. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
  • Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York: New York University Press.
  • Livingstone, S. (2005). On the relation between audiences and publics. In S. Livingstone (Ed.), Audience and publics: When cultural engagement matters for the public sphere (pp. 17–41). Bristol: Intellect.
  • Melucci, A. (1980). The new social movements: A theoretical approach. Social Science Information, 19, 199–226.
  • Meraz, S., & Papacharissi, Z. (2013). Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18, 138–166.
  • Miller, V. (2008). New media, networking and phatic culture. Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies, 14, 387–400.
  • Milner, R. (2013). Pop polyvocality: Internet memes, public participation, and the occupy wall street movement. International Journal of Communication, 7, 2357–2390.
  • Ministry of Health. (2015a, May 27). Fertilità, Ministro Lorenzin presenta piano nazionale [Fertility, Minister Lorenzin presents the national plan] [online news release]. Retrieved from http://www.salute.gov.it/portale/news/p3_2_1_1_1.jsp?lingua=italiano&menu=notizie&p=dalministero&id=2083
  • Ministry of Health. (2015b, May 27). Piano nazionale per la fertilità [National fertility plan]. [Ministerial National Plan]. Retrieved from: http://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_pubblicazioni_2367_allegato.pdf
  • Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A private sphere: Democracy in a digital age. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. New York: Viking.
  • Patterson, T. E. (1980). The mass media election: How americans choose their president. New York: Praeger Publishers.
  • Payton, M. (2016). Italy’s ‘Fertility Day’ campaign encouraging baby-making is provoking an angry response. The Independent. Retrieved from: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/italys-baby-making-campaign-fertility-day-birth-rate-an-angry-response-fertility-a7221321.html
  • Pearce, W., Holmberg, K., Hellsten, I., Nerlich, B., & Amblard F. (2014). Climate change on Twitter: Topics, communities and conversations about the 2013 IPCC Working Group 1 Report. PLoS ONE, 9(4), e94785. Retrieved from https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094785
  • Rambukkana, N. (2015). Hashtag publics: The power and politics of discursive networks. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Rose, G. (2001). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. London: Sage.
  • Shifman, L. (2013). Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(3), 362–377.
  • Shifman, L. (2014). The cultural logic of photo-based meme genres. Journal of Visual Culture, 13, 340–358.
  • Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Tay, G. (2014). Binders full of LOLitics: Political humour, internet memes, and play in the 2012 US presidential election (and beyond). European Journal of Humour Research, 2, 46–73.
  • Tremayne, M. (2014). Anatomy of protest in the digital Era: A network analysis of Twitter and occupy wall street. Social Movement Studies, 13, 110–126.
  • Vaccari, C., Valeriani, A., Barberá, P., Bonneau, R., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2015). Political expression and action on social media: Exploring the relationship between lower and higher-threshold political activities among Twitter users in Italy. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 221–239.
  • Vazzana, S. (2016, September 21). ‘Fertility Fake’, in piazza contro la giornata della fertilità [‘Fertility Fake’, on the street against fertility day]. La Stampa. Retrieved from: http://www.lastampa.it/2016/09/21/italia/fertility-fake-in-piazza-contro-la-giornata-della-fertilit-G0hsSulBUxECX0HisehB3J/pagina.html
  • Vicari, S. (2017). Twitter and non-elites: Interpreting power dynamics in the life story of the (#)BRCA Twitter stream. Social Media + Society, 3(3), 1–14.
  • Wikström, P. (2014). Srynotfunny: Communicative functions of hashtags on Twitter. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 27, 127–152.
  • Yardi, S., & boyd, d. (2010). Dynamic debates: An analysis of group polarization over time on Twitter. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30, 316–327.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.