Framing Smart Nation: A moderated mediation analysis of frame-focus effects

References

• Acquisti, A., John, L. K., & Loewenstein, G. (2012). The impact of relative standards on the propensity to disclose. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 160–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acquisti, A., Taylor, C., & Wagman, L. (2016). The economics of privacy. Journal of Economic Literature, 54(2), 442–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja, A. (2017). Commentary: Smart cities might not be such a bright idea. Channel News Asia. Retrieved from https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asiapacific/commentary-smart-cities-might-not-be-such-a-bright-idea-9474258
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Saqer, N. S., & Seliaman, M. E. (2016). The impact of privacy concerns and perceived vulnerability to risks on users’ privacy protection behaviors on SNS: A structural equation. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 7(5), 142–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek, Y. M., Bae, Y., Jeong, I., Kim, E., & Rhee, J. W. (2014). Changing the default setting for information privacy protection: What and whose personal information can be better protected? The Social Science Journal, 51, 523–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, T. (n.d). Singapore: A smart living laboratory. Retrieved from https://www.scientificamerican.com/products/singapore-a-smart-nation/singapore-a-smart-living-laboratory/
   Google Scholar
• Binder, M., Childers, M., & Johnson, N. (2015). Campaigns and the mitigation of framing effects on voting behavior: A natural and field experiment. Political Behavior, 37(3), 703–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, L. G., & Keller, P. A. (1995). When to accentuate the negative: The effects of perceived efficacy and message framing on intentions to perform a health-related behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 192–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cesario, J., Corker, K. S., & Jelinek, S. (2013). A self-regulatory framework for message framing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 238–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry, T. L., Kallbekken, S., & Kroll, S. (2012). The acceptability of efficiency-enhancing environmental taxes, subsidies and regulation: An experimental investigation. Environmental Science & Policy, 16, 90–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 637–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, M. A., & Richeson, J. A. (2014). Not in my backyard! Authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and support for strict immigration policies at home and abroad. Political Psychology, 35(3), 417–429. doi: 10.1111/pops.12078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dienlin, T., & Metzger, M. J. (2016). An extended privacy calculus model for SNSs: Analyzing self-disclosure and self-withdrawal in a representative US sample. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(5), 368–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2004). Internet privacy concerns and their antecedents - measurement validity and a regression model. Behaviour and Information Technology, 23(6), 413–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N. (2004). Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir) relevance of framing effects. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 671–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (2010). Framing Media Power. In P D'Angelo & J.A Kuypers (Eds.), Doing News Framing Analysis: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 331–355). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1987). The changing culture of affirmative action. In R. G. Braungart (Ed.), Research in political sociology (Vol. 3, pp. 137–177). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (2011). What is motivation? Beyond pleasure and pain: How motivation works. United States: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, C.-L., & Chen, M.-C. (2014). Explaining consumer attitudes and purchase intentions toward organic food: Contributions from regulatory fit and consumer characteristics. Food Quality and Preference, 35, 6–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. J., Bellman, S., & Lohse, G. L. (2002). Defaults, framing and privacy: Why opting in-opting out. Marketing Letters, 13(1), 5–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. (2018). Multiple latent variable models: Confirmatory factor analysis. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/cm/mfactor.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kobsa, A., Cho, H., & Knijnenburg, B. P. (2016). The effect of personalization provider characteristics on privacy attitudes and behaviors: An Elaboration Likelihood model approach. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(11), 2587–2606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasnova, H., Spiekermann, S., Koroleva, K., & Hildebrand, T. (2010). Online social networks: Why we disclose. Journal of Information Technology, 25(2), 109–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwang, K. (2015). Smart Nation an opportunity to ‘shift tone of society’: Vivian Balakrishnan. Channel News Asia. Retrieved from http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/smart-nation-an/1760886.html
   Google Scholar
• Latimer, A. E., Salovey, P., & Rothman, A. J. (2007). The effectiveness of gain-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behavior: Is all hope lost? Journal of Health Communication, 12, 645–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecheler, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2012). News framing and public opinion: A mediation analysis of framing effects on political attitudes. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(2), 185–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 205–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Sarathy, R., & Xu, H. (2010). Understanding situational online information disclosure as a privacy calculus. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 51(1), 62–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luttig, M. D., & Lavine, H. (2016). Issue frames, personality, and political persuasion. American Politics Research, 44(3), 448–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheswaran, D., & Meyers-Levy, J. (1990). The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 361–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet users’ information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 336–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maule, J., & Villejoubert, G. (2007). What lies beneath: Reframing framing effects. Thinking & Reasoning, 13(1), 25–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinsey Global Institute. (2018). Smart cities: Digital solutions for more livable future. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/capital-projects-and-infrastructure/our-insights/smart-cities-digital-solutions-for-a-more-livable-future
   Google Scholar
• Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 500–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayar, P. K. (2015). Vulnerability, safety, surveillance citizenship and identity in the age of surveillance. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A., & Oxley, Z. M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91(3), 567–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pleger, L. E., Lutz, P., & Sager, F. (2018). Public acceptance of incentive-based spatial planning policies: A framing experiment. Land Use Policy, 73, 225–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenstock, I. M. (1974). Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Education Monographs, 2(4), 328–335.
   Google Scholar
• Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rule, J. B. (2007). The making of an issue. Privacy in peril: How we are sacrificing a fundamental right in exchange for security and convenience. United States: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shao, W. (2012). Framing and efficacy: The effect of regulatory fit on skin cancer prevention and detection. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 24, 161–180.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. J., Milberg, S. J., & Burke, S. J. (1996). Information privacy: Measuring individuals’ concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quarterly, 20(2), 167–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiegel, S., Grant-Pillow, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). How regulatory fit enhances motivational strength during goal pursuit. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 39–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, D., Scheufele, D. A., Bryant, J., & Oliver, M. B. (2009). News framing theory and research. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 17–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Tham, I. (2017). Untangling the way to a Smart Nation. The Straits Times. Retrieved from http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/untangling-the-way-to-a-smart-nation
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2014). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352). Retrieved from https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/publications/files/wup2014-highlights.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vanolo, A. (2014). Smartmentality: The smart city as disciplinary strategy. Urban Studies Journal, 51(5), 883–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaquero-García, A., Álvarez-García, J., & Peris-Ortiz, M. (2016). Urban models of sustainable development from the economic perspective: Smart cities. In M. Peris-Ortiz, D. R. Bennett, & D. P.-B. Yábar (Eds.), Sustainable smart cities, innovation, technology, and Knowledge Management (pp. 15–29). Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, G., & Pechmann, C. (2007). The impact of regulatory focus on adolescents’ response to antismoking advertising campaigns. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(4), 671–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar