Interactionism in the age of ubiquitous telecommunication

References

• Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. (2012). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (Anniversary ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. E., & Law, J. (1992). Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1984). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review, 32, 196–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos-Castillo, C., & Hitlin, S. (2013). Copresence: Revisiting a building block for social interaction theories. Sociological Theory, 31(2), 168–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerulo, K. A. (1997). Reframing sociological concepts for a brave new (virtual?) world. Sociological Inquiry, 67(1), 48–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682x.1997.tb00428.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, G., King, A., & Rettie, R. (2009). Sociological objects: Reconfigurations of social theory. London: Ashgate Publishing. Retrieved from http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/754892/
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, N. (2001). The social body: Habit, identity and desire. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. L. (2015). Theorizing affordances. Retrieved from https://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2015/02/16/theorizing-affordances/
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. L., & Chouinard, J. B. (2016). Theorizing affordances: From request to refuse. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 36(4), 241–248. doi: 10.1177/0270467617714944
   Google Scholar
• Erofeeva, M. (2017). Actor-network theory: An object-oriented sociology without objects? Logos (Russian Federation, 27(3), 83–112. doi: 10.22394/0869-5377-2017-3-83-109
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2016). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farman, J. (2013). Mobile interface theory: Embodied space and locative media. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, S. M. (2011). Reconceptualizing the public/private distinction in the age of information technology. Information, Communication & Society, 14(4), 550–567. doi: 10.1080/1369118x.2011.562220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (2015). The ecological approach to visual perception: Classic edition. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday anchor books, A174. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order: American sociological association, 1982 presidential address. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 1–17. doi: 10.2307/2095141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1986). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience (Rev ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotved, S. (2014). Privacy with public access: Digital memorials on quick response codes. Information, Communication & Society, 18(3), 269–280. doi: 10.1080/1369118x.2014.989250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardey, M. (2008). The formation of social rules for digital interactions. Information, Communication & Society, 11(8), 1111–1131. doi: 10.1080/13691180802109048
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. (2009). Prince of networks: Bruno Latour and metaphysics. Melbourne: re.press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, N. K. (2008). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, M. H. (Ed.). (2010). The contemporary Goffman. Routledge studies in social and political thought. Vol. 68. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski, P., & Pinch, T. (2013). Sociomateriality is ‘the new black’: Accomplishing repurposing, reinscripting and repairing in context. Management (France, 16(5), 579–592.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. (1988). Mixing humans and nonhumans together: The sociology of a door-closer. Social Problems, 35(3), 298–310. doi: 10.2307/800624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina, K. (2009). The Synthetic situation: Interactionism for a global world. Symbolic Interaction, 32(1), 61–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lageson, S. E., & Maruna, S. (2017). Digital degradation: Stigma management in the internet age. Punishment & Society, 20(1), 113–133. doi: 10.1177/1462474517737050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, R., & Kling, R. (2003). Reconceptualizing users as social actors in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 197–236. doi:10.2307/30036529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1988). The pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1994). On technical mediation: Philosophy, sociology, genealogy. Common Knowledge, 3(2), 29–64.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1996). On interobjectivity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(4), 228–245.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2002). Gabriel tarde and the end of the social. In P. Joyce (Ed.), The social in question. New bearings in history and the social sciences (pp. 117–132). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Clarendon lectures in management studies. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martey, R. M., Stromer-Galley, J., Banks, J., Wu, J., & Consalvo, M. (2014). The strategic female: Gender-switching and player behavior in online games. Information, Communication & Society, 17(3), 286–300. doi: 10.1080/1369118x.2013.874493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, G. T. (1999). What’s in a name? Some Reflections on the Sociology of Anonymity. The Information Society, 15(2), 99–112. doi: 10.1080/019722499128565
   Google Scholar
• Miller, B., & Mundey, P. (2014). Follow the rules and no one will get hurt: Performing boundary work to avoid negative interactions when using social network sites. Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 187–201. doi: 10.1080/1369118x.2014.946433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2016). Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(3), 336–366. doi: 10.1111/josl.1_12177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevile, M. (2015). The embodied turn in research on language and social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(2), 121–151. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2015.1025499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinch, T. (2010). The invisible technologies of Goffman’s sociology: From the Merry-go-round to the internet. Technology and Culture, 51(2), 409–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinch, T., & Bijker, W. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399–441. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/285355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rettie, R. (2005). Presence and embodiment in mobile phone communication. PsychNology Journal, 3(1), 16–34.
   Google Scholar
• Rettie, R. (2009). Mobile phone communication: Extending Goffman to mediated interaction. Sociology, 43(3), 421–438. doi: 10.1177/0038038509103197
   Google Scholar
• Rey, P. J., & Boesel, W. E. (2014). The web, digital prostheses, and augmented subjectivity. In P. J. Rey & W. E. Boesel (Eds.), Routledge handbook of science, technology, and society (pp. 173–188). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, L. (2017). The identity curation game: Digital inequality, identity work, and emotion management. Information, Communication & Society, 21(5), 661–680. doi: 10.1080/1369118x.2017.1411521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandywell, B. (2004). The myth of everyday life: Toward a heterology of the ordinary. Cultural Studies, 18(2–3), 160–180. doi: 10.1080/0950238042000201464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayes, E. (2014). Actor–network theory and methodology: Just what does it mean to say that nonhumans have agency? Social Studies of Science, 44(1), 134–149. doi: 10.1177/0306312713511867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schau, H. J., & Gilly, M. C. (2003). We are what we post? Self-presentation in personal web space. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 385–404. doi: 10.1086/378616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraube, E. (2009). Technology as materialized action and its ambivalences. Theory & Psychology, 19(2), 296–312. doi: 10.1177/0959354309103543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutz, A. (1932). Der Sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt: Eine Einleitung in die verstehende Soziologie. Wien: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2009). Faceworking: Exploring students’ education-related use of Facebook. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 157–174. doi: 10.1080/17439880902923622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shilling, C. (2012). The body and social theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z. (2008). Grooming, gossip, Facebook and Myspace. Information, Communication & Society, 11(4), 544–564. doi: 10.1080/13691180801999050
   Google Scholar
• Vakhshtain, V. (2011). Sociologiya povsednevnosti i teoriya frejmov [Sociology of everyday life and frame theory]. Saint Petersburg: European University at Saint Petersburg.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43. doi: 10.1177/009365096023001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, S. (2003). Toward a taxonomy of copresence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(5), 445–455. doi: 10.1162/105474603322761261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, S. (2004). Consociated contemporaries as an emergent realm of the lifeworld: Extending Schutz’s phenomenological analysis to cyberspace. Human Studies, 27(1), 91–105. doi: 10.1023/B:HUMA.0000012246.33089.68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, S. (2006). The internet and the transformation of the reality of everyday life: Toward a new analytic stance in sociology. Sociological Inquiry, 76(4), 458–474. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682x.2006.00166.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, S. (2015). Constitution of mutual knowledge in telecopresence: Updating Schutz’s phenomenological theory of the lifeworld. Journal of Creative Communications, 10(2), 105–127. doi: 10.1177/0973258615597376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S., & Martin, J. (2008). Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1816–1836. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar