Symposium on political communication and social movements: ships passing in the nightFootnote^*

* A draft of this paper was presented at the 2018 American Sociological Association Meeting.

References

• Ackland, R., & O’Neil, M. (2011). Online collective identity: The case of the environmental movement. Social Networks, 33(3), 177–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker-Plummer, B., & Barker-Plummer, D. (2018). Twitter as a feminist resource: #YESALLWOMEN, digital platforms, and discursive social change. Studies in Media and Communication, 14, 91–118.
   Google Scholar
• Bastos, M. T., & Mercea, D. (2017). The Brexit botnet and user-generated hyperpartisan news. Social Science Computer Review, 37, 38–54. doi: 10.1177/0894439317734157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, L. (2003). Communicating global activism. Information, Communication & Society, 6(2), 143–168.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707–731. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessi, A., & Ferrara, E. (2016). Social bots distort the 2016 U.S. presidential election online discussion. First Monday, 21(11), doi: 10.5210/fm.v21i11.7090
   Google Scholar
• Beyerlein, K., & Hipp, J. (2006). A two-stage model for a two-stage process: How biographical availability matters for social movement mobilization. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 11(3), 299–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binns, A. (2012). Don’t feed the trolls! Journalism Practice, 6(4), 547–562. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2011.648988
   Google Scholar
• Blee, K. (2002). Inside organized racism: Women in the hate movement. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Block, J., Haan, N., & Smith, M. B. (1972). Socialization correlates of student activism. In A. Orum (Ed.), The seeds of politics: Youth and politics in America (pp. 215–231). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Blom, R., Carpenter, S., Bowe, B. J., & Lange, R. (2014). Frequent contributors within U.S. newspaper comment forums. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(10), 1314–1328. doi: 10.1177/0002764214527094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burstein, P. (2014). American public opinion, advocacy, and policy in congress: What the public wants and what it gets. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, K. K. (2015). “It’s like she’s eager to be verbally abused”: Twitter, trolls, and (En)Gendering disciplinary rhetoric. Feminist Media Studies, 15(2), 356–358. doi: 10.1080/14680777.2015.1008750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreier, P., & Martin, C. (2010). How acorn was framed: Political controversy and media agenda setting. Perspectives on Politics, 8(3), 761–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, J. (2003). Tanks, tear gas and taxes: Toward a theory of movement repression. Sociological Theory, 21, 44–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, J. (2014). Something old and something new: A comment on “new media, new civics”. Policy & Internet, 6(2), 169–175.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Spence, P. R., & Shelton, A. K. (2014). Is that a bot running the social media feed? Testing the differences in perceptions of communication quality for a human agent and a bot agent on Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 372–376. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.08.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fillieule, O. (2010). Some elements of an interactionist approach to political disengagement. Social Movement Studies, 9(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., & McInerney, P. B. (2012). The limits of networks in social movement retention: On canvassers and their careers. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 17(2), 109–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, H., Dubois, E., & Puschmann, C. (2010). Keeping ottawa honest – One tweet at a time? Politicians, Journalists, Wikipedians, and their Twitter bots. International Journal of Communication, 10(2016), 4891–4914.
   Google Scholar
• Futrell, R., & Simi, P. (2004). Free spaces, collective identity, and the persistence of U.S. white power activism. Social Problems, 51(1), 16–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. (1992). Talking politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2015). Protest avatars as memetic signifiers: Political profile pictures and the construction of collective identity on social media in the 2011 protest wave. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 916–929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, J. (1997). The libidinal constitution of a high-risk social movement: Affectual ties and solidarity in the Huk rebellion, 1946 to 1954. American Sociological Review, 62(1), 53–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, J., Jasper, J., & Polletta, F. (2001). Why emotions matter. In J. Goodwin, J. Jasper, & F. Polletta (Eds.), Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements (pp. 1–24). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S., Job-Sluder, K., Scheckler, R., & Barab, S. (2002). Searching for safety online: Managing “trolling” in a feminist forum. The Information Society, 18(5), 371–384. doi: 10.1080/01972240290108186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, E. (1990). Sacrifice for the cause: Group processes, recruitment, and Commitment in a student social movement. American Sociological Review, 55(2), 243–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyman, H. (1959). Political socialization. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. J., & Foucault Welles, B. (2016). #Ferguson is everywhere: Initiators in emerging counterpublic networks. Information, Communication & Society, 19(3), 397–418. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1106571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, Carrie, & Lee, Ashley. (2017). Speaking up online: Civic identity and expression in the digital age. In Jennifer Earl & Deana A. Rohlinger (Eds.), Social Movements and Media (Studies in Media and Communications) (Vol. 14, pp. 119–146). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. (1997). The art of moral protest: Culture, biography, and creativity in social movements. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. (1998). The emotions of protest: Affective and reactive emotions in and around social movements. Sociological Forum, 13(3), 397–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. M., & Poulsen, J. D. (1995). Recruiting strangers and friends: Moral shocks and social networks in animal rights and anti-nuclear protests. Social Problems, 42(4), 493–512. doi: 10.2307/3097043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Schneer, B., & White, A. (2017). How the news media activate public expression and influence national agendas. Science, 358(6364), 776–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitts, J. (2000). Mobilizing in black boxes: Social networks and participation in social movement organizations. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 5(2), 241–257. doi: 10.17813/maiq.5.2.5408016w34215787
   Google Scholar
• Kollanyi, B., Howard, P., & Wooley, S. (2016). Bots and automation over Twitter during the U.S. election. Project on Computational Propaganda. Retrieved from http://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/working-papers/bots-and-automation-over-twitter-during-the-u-s-election/
   Google Scholar
• Lichterman, P. (1996). The search for political community: American activists reinventing commitment Cambridge University Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Llewellyn, C., Cram, L., Favero, A., & Hill, R. (2018). For whom the bell trolls: Troll behaviour in the Twitter Brexit Debate. Arxiv. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.08754
   Google Scholar
• Margetts, H., John, P., Hale, S., & Yasseri, T. (2016). Political Turbulence: How social media shape collective action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D. (1988). Freedom summer. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D. (1989). The biographical consequences of activism. American Sociological Review, 54(5), 744–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, S. C., Mourão, R. R., & Molyneux, L. (2017). Twitter as a tool for and object of political and electoral activity: Considering electoral context and variance among actors. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 14(2), 154–167. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2017.1308289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mill, S. J. (1884). A system of logic: Ratiocinative and inductive. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Monterde, A., Calleja-López, A., Aguilera, M., Barandiaran, X. E., & Postill, J. (2015). Multitudinous identities: A qualitative and network analysis of the 15M collective identity. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 930–950. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murthy, D., Powell, A., Tinati, R., Anstead, N., Carr, L., Halford, S., & Weal, M. (2010). Bots and political influence: A sociotechnical investigation of social network capital. International Journal of Communication, 10(2016), 4952–4971.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlheiser, A. (2017, October 19). Meet the woman who coinced ‘me too’ 10 years ago - To help women of color. The Washington Post.
   Google Scholar
• Passy, F., & Giugni, M. (2001). Social networks and individual perceptions: Explaining the differential participation in social movements. Sociological Forum, 16(1), 123–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, W. (2015). This is why we can’t have nice things: Mapping the relationship between online trolling and mainstream Culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F., & Jasper, J. (2001). Collective identity and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 283–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohlinger, D., & Earl, J. (2018). The past, present, and future of media and social movement studies: Introduction to the special issue on media and social movements. Studies in Media and Communication, 14, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Rohlinger, D. A., Vaccaro, C., Naiman-Sessions, M., & Mauney, H. (2015). Individual claims-making in the Terri Schiavo case. Social Currents, 2(4), 361–376.
   Google Scholar
• Rohlinger, D., & Williams, C. (2019). Crises and civility: Twitter discourse after school shootings. In R. Boatright, T. Shaffer, S. Sobieraj, & D. Goldthwaite Young (Eds.), A crisis of civility? Political discourse and its discontents (pp. Chapter 6). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rojecki, A., & Meraz, S. (2016). Rumors and factitious informational blends: The role of the web in speculative politics. New Media & Society, 18(1), 25–43. doi: 10.1177/1461444814535724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57, 9–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social Psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, D., Soule, S., & Kriesi, H. (2004). Mapping the terrain. In D. Snow, S. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 3–16). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D., Zurcher, L., & Peters, R. (1981). Victory celebrations as theater: A dramaturgical approach to crowd behavior. Symbolic Interaction, 4(1), 21–42.
   Google Scholar
• Sobieraj, S. (2017). Bitch, slut, skank, cunt: Patterned resistance to women’s visibility in digital publics. Information, Communication & Society, 1–15. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1348535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stryker, S. (2000). Identity competition: Key to differential social movement participation? In S. Stryker, T. Owens, & R. White (Eds.), Self, identity, and social movements (pp. 21–40). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., de Vreese, C., Matthes, J., … Stanyer, J. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27. doi: 10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, I., & Walker, K. N. (1969). Student politics and political Systems: Toward a typology. American Journal of Sociology, 75(1), 77–96. doi: 10.1086/224746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woehrle, L., Coy, P., & Maney, G. (2008). Contesting patriotism: Culture, power, and strategy in the peace movement. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S. (1985). Why not a sociology of machines? The case of sociology and artificial intelligence. Sociology, 19(4), 557–572. doi: 10.1177/0038038585019004005
   Google Scholar
• Woolley, S. (2016). Automating power: Social bot interference in global politics. First Monday, 21(4). doi: 10.5210/fm.v21i4.6161
   Google Scholar