Audiences in social context: bridging the divides between political communications and social movements scholarshipFootnote^†

† Symposium on Political Communication and Social Movements.

References

• Amenta, E., Caren, N., Olasky, S. J., & Stobaugh, J. E. (2009). All the movements fit to print: Who, what, when, where, and why SMO families appeared in The New York Times in the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 74(4), 636–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, K. T., & Caren, N. (2010). Making the news: Movement organizations, media attention, and the public agenda. American Sociological Review, 75(6), 841–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bail, C. A., Argyle, L., Brown, T., Bumpus, J., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M. F., & Volfovsky, A. (under review). Exposure to opposing views can increase political polarization: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment on social media.
   Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blee, K., & McDowell, A. (2012). Social movement audiences. Sociological Forum, 27(1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brader, T. (2006). Campaigning for hearts and minds: How emotional appeals in political ads work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. J., & Geer, J. G. (2007). Beyond negativity: The effects of incivility on the electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. (Ed.). (2014). Methodological practices in social movement research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, J., & Garrett, R. K. (2017). The new information frontier: Toward a more nuanced view of social movement communication. Social Movement Studies, 16(4), 479–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasoph, N. (2001). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rohlinger, D. A. (2006). Friends and Foes: Media, Politics, and Tactics in the Abortion War. Social Problems, 53(4), 537–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A. (1994). Talking politics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., & Wolfsfeld, G. (1993). Movements and media as interacting systems. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528(1), 114–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, B. T. (2014). Following the news? Reception of uncivil partisan media and the use of incivility in political expression. Political Communication, 31(4), 564–583. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2013.852640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitlin, T. (1978). Media sociology. Theory and Society, 6(2), 205–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitlin, T. (2003). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karpf, D., Kreiss, D., Nielsen, R. K., & Powers, M. (2015). Qualitative political communication| introduction∼ The role of qualitative methods in political communication research: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Communication, 9, 19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D. (2017). The fragmenting of the civil sphere: How partisan identity shapes the moral evaluation of candidates and epistemology. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 5(3), 443–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levendusky, M., & Malhotra, N. (2016). Does media coverage of partisan polarization affect political attitudes? Political Communication, 33(2), 283–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moy, P., & Gastil, J. (2006). Predicting deliberative conversation: The impact of discussion networks, media use, and political cognitions. Political Communication, 23(4), 443–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2001). Facilitating communication across lines of political difference: The role of mass media. American Political Science Review, 95(1), 97–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2015). In-your-face politics: The consequences of uncivil media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C., & Mondak, J. J. (2006). The workplace as a context for cross-cutting political discourse. The Journal of Politics, 68(1), 140–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence a theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin, A. J. (2009). Citizen speak: The democratic imagination in American life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F. (2009). It was like a fever: Storytelling in protest and politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rohlinger, D. A. (2015). Abortion politics, mass media, and social movements in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sobieraj, S. (2010). Reporting Conventions: Journalists, Activists, and the Thorny Struggle for Political Visibility. Social Problems, 57(4), 505–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobieraj, S. (2011). Soundbitten: The perils of media-centered political activism. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sobieraj, S., Berry, J. M., & Connors, A. (2013). Outrageous political opinion and political anxiety in the US. Poetics, 41(5), 407–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news the politics of news choice. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J., & Muddiman, A. (2013). Selective exposure, tolerance, and satirical news. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(3), 271–290. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edt013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, K. C., & Cramer, K. J. (2004). Talking about politics: Informal groups and social identity in American life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt, R. O., Katz, E., & Kim, J. (2000). Bridging the spheres: Political and personal conversation in public and private spaces. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 71–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar