Symposium on political communication and social movements: audience, persuasion, and influence

References

• Amenta, E., Caren, N., Chiarello, E., & Su, Y. (2010). The political consequences of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 287–307. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, K. T. (2001). Social movements and policy implementation: The Mississippi Civil Rights movement and the War on Poverty, 1965 to 1971. American Sociological Review, 66(1), 71–95. doi: 10.2307/2657394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthel, M. (2018). 5 Facts about the state of the news media in 2017. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, J., & Maher, T. V. (2017). Turning fans into heroes: How the Harry Potter alliance uses the power of story to facilitate fan activism and bloc recruitment. In J. Earl & D. Rohlinger (Eds.), Social movements and media (pp. 23–54). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Burstein, P. (1999). Social movements and public policy. In M. Giugni, D. McAdam, & C. Tilly (Eds.), How social movements matter (pp. 3–21). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cadena-Roa, J. (2002). Strategic framing, emotions and superbarrio ‒ Mexico city's masked crusader. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 7(2), 201–216.
   Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, X. M. (2014). The political effects of entertainment media. In K. Kenski & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication. New York: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199793471-e-009. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.009_update_001
   Google Scholar
• Earl, J. (2004). The cultural consequences of social movements. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 508–530). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, J. (2016). Protest online: Theorizing the consequences of online engagement. In L. Bosi, M. Giugni, & K. Uba (Eds.), The consequences of social movements (pp. 363–400). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, J., & Beyer, J. L. (2014). The dynamics of backlash online: Anonymous and the battle for WikiLeaks. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, 37, 207–233. doi: 10.1108/S0163-786X20140000037007
   Google Scholar
• Earl, J., & Garrett, R. K. (2017). The new information frontier: Toward a more nuanced view of social movement communication. Social Movement Studies, 16(4), 479–493. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2016.1192028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. (2014). The hostile media effect. In K. Kenski & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication. New York: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199793471-e-009. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.009_update_001
   Google Scholar
• Galli, A. M. (2016). How glitter bombing lost its sparkle: The emergence and decline of a novel social movement tactic. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 21(3), 259–281. doi: 10.17813/1086-671x-20-3-259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halfmann, D., & Young, M. (2010). War pictures: The grotesque as a mobilizing tactic. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 15(1), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindman, M. (2009). The myth of digital democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, L. (2010). Defenders of nature and the Comarca: Collective identity and frames in Panama. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 15(1), 63–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. (2004). A strategic approach to collective action: Looking for agency in social-movement choices. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 9(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• King, B. G., Bentele, K. G., & Soule, S. A. (2007). Protest and policymaking: Explaining fluctuation in congressional attention to rights issues, 1960–1986. Social Forces, 86(1), 137–163. doi: 10.1353/sof.2007.0101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas: A series of addresses (pp. 37–52). New York, NY: Institute for Religious and Social Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Linden, A., & Klandermans, B. (2006). Stigmatization and repression of extreme right activism in the Netherlands. Mobilization, 11(2), 213–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, T. V., & Earl, J. (2017). Pathways to contemporary youth protest: The continuing relevance of family, friends, and school for youth micromobilization. In J. Earl & D. Rohlinger (Eds.), Social movements and media (pp. 55–87). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• McCammon, H. J. (2014). The U.S. Women's jury movements and strategic Adaptation: A more just verdict. Oxford: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Munson, Z. W. (2009). The making of pro-life activists: How social movement mobilization works. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pryor, B., Mendez, J. M., & Herrick, R. (2014). Let’s be fair: Do polling locations prime votes? Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs, 2, 126. doi: 10.4172/2332-0761.1000126
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds-Stenson, H. (2018). Building a wall of resistance: Collective action and rationality in the anti-terror age (PhD Dissertation). University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Rohlinger, D. A. (2015). Abortion politics, mass media, and social movements in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rutchick, A. M. (2010). Deus Ex Machina: The influence of polling place on voting behavior. Political Psychology, 31(2), 209–225. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00749.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2014). The state of framing research: A call for new directions. In K. Kenski & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication. New York: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199793471-e-009. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.009_update_001
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51, 464–481. doi: 10.2307/2095581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobieraj, S. (2011). Soundbitten: The perils of media-centered political activism. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2014). Selective exposure theories. In K. Kenski & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication. New York: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199793471-e-009. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.009_update_001
   Google Scholar
• Swerts, T. (2015). Gaining a voice: Storytelling and undocumented youth activism in Chicago. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 20(3), 345–360. doi: 10.17813/1086-671x-20-3-345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M. (2011). Pulling toward or pulling away: Deliberation, disagreement, and opinion extremity in political participation. Social Science Quarterly, 92, 207–225. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00764.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, E. (2016). Rooftop solar, and the four levers of social change. Retrieved from http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2016/03/25/rooftop-solar-and-the-four-levers-of-social-change/
   Google Scholar