Data witnessing: attending to injustice with data in Amnesty International’s Decoders project

References

• Allan, S. (2013). Citizen witnessing: Revisioning journalism in times of crisis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty Decoders. (2018). Become an Amnesty Decoder. Retrieved from https://decoders.amnesty.org
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. (2011). Nigeria: The true ‘tragedy’: Delays and failures in tackling oil spills in the Niger Delta. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. (2013). Nigeria: Bad information: Oil spill investigations in the Niger Delta. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. (2015). Nigeria: Clean it up: Shell’s false claims about oil spill response in the Niger Delta. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. (2018a). Negligence in the Niger Delta: Decoding Shell and Eni’s poor record on oil spills. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. (2018b). Toxic Twitter - a toxic place for women. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. (2018c). Troll Patrol findings. London: Amnesty International. Retrieved from https://decoders.amnesty.org/projects/troll-patrol/findings
   Google Scholar
• Aradau, C., & Hill, A. (2013). The politics of drawing: Children, evidence, and the Darfur conflict. International Political Sociology, 7, 368–387. doi: 10.1111/ips.12029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. (1990). On revolution. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, U. (2005). Spectral evidence: The photography of trauma. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, A. (2012). Political situations: Knowledge controversies in transnational governance. Critical Policy Studies, 6, 324–336. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2012.699234
   Google Scholar
• Barry, A. (2013a). Material politics: Disputes along the pipeline. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, A. (2013b). Transparency as a political device. In M. Akrich, Y. Barthe, F. Muniesa, & P. Mustar (Eds.), Débordements : mélanges offerts à Michel Callon (pp. 21–39). Paris: Presses des Mines.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S. (2007). Telling about society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L. (1999). Distant suffering: Morality, media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, I., Didier, E., & Vitale, T. (2014). Statactivism: Forms of action between Disclosure and Affirmation. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 7, 198–220.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, T. (2002). ‘The Truth will Set You free’: The making of Amnesty International. Journal of Contemporary History, 37, 575–597. doi: 10.1177/00220094020370040501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candler, G. G. (2001). Transformations and legitimacy in nonprofit organizations — the case of Amnesty International and the brutalization thesis. Public Organization Review, 1, 355–370. doi: 10.1023/A:1012288930985
   Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, L. (2010). Post-humanitarianism: Humanitarian communication beyond a politics of pity. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 13, 107–126. doi: 10.1177/1367877909356720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, L. (2015a). Digital witnessing in conflict zones: The politics of remediation. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 1362–1377. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1070890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, L. (2015b). Digital witnessing in war journalism: The case of post-Arab Spring conflicts. Popular Communication, 13, 105–119. doi: 10.1080/15405702.2015.1021467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, H., & Kusch, M. (1999). The shape of actions: What humans and machines can do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cornebise, J. (2017). Descriptive statistics on Decoders data. Unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Cornebise, J., Worrall, D., Farfour, M., & Marin, M. (2018). Witnessing atrocities: Quantifying villages destruction in Darfur with crowdsourcing and transfer learning. Presented at the AI for Social Good NIPS2018 Workshop, Montréal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Dencik, L., Hintz, A., & Cable, J. (2016). Towards data justice? The ambiguity of anti-surveillance resistance in political activism. Big Data & Society, 3, 1–12. doi: 10.1177/2053951716679678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhrodia, A. (2017). Unsocial media: Tracking Twitter abuse against women MPs. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@AmnestyInsights/unsocial-media-tracking-twitter-abuse-against-women-mps-fc28aeca498a
   Google Scholar
• D’Souza, R. (2017). What’s wrong with rights?: Social movements, law and liberal imaginations. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Engine Room, & Amnesty International. (2016). Microtasking. Retrieved from https://library.theengineroom.org/microtasking/
   Google Scholar
• Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (1998). Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 313–343. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felman, S., & Laub, D. (1992). Testimony: Crises of witnessing in literature, psychoanalysis, and history. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forensic Architecture. (2014). Forensis: The architecture of public truth. Berlin: Sternberg Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frosh, P. (2009). Telling presences: Witnessing, mass media, and the imagined lives of strangers. In A. Pinchevski & P. Frosh (Eds.), Media witnessing: Testimony in the age of mass communication (pp. 49–72). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Frosh, P., & Pinchevski, A. (eds.). (2009). Media witnessing: Testimony in the age of mass communication. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Geuss, R. (2001). History and illusion in politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geuss, R., & Hamilton, L. (2013). Human rights: A very bad idea. Theoria, 60, 83–103. doi: 10.3167/th.2013.6013505
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606–633. doi: 10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, J. (2014). Alt-Click: A new generation of human rights activists (Unpublished). London: Amnesty International.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (2018). Three aspects of data worlds. Krisis: Journal for Contemporary Philosophy, 1, 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J., Gerlitz, C., & Bounegru, L. (2018). Data infrastructure literacy. Big Data & Society, 5, 1–13. doi: 10.1177/2053951718786316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, S. (2015). Ubiquitous witnesses: Who creates the evidence and the live(d) experience of human rights violations? Information, Communication & Society, 18, 1378–1392. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1070891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosser, B. (2014). What do metrics want? How quantification prescribes social interaction on Facebook. Computational Culture, 4. Retrieved from http://computationalculture.net/what-do-metrics-want/.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (2018). Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouse™: feminism and technoscience (Second edition). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heckner, E. (2008). Whose trauma is it? Identification and secondary witnessing in the age of postmemory. In D. Bathrick, B. Prager, & M. D. Richardson (Eds.), Visualizing the Holocaust: Documents, aesthetics, memory (pp. 63–85). Rochester, NY: Camden House.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, D. W. (2018). Bearing witness, moral responsibility and distant suffering. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(1), 27–45. doi: 10.1177/0263276418776366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, M. (2008). The Generation of postmemory. Poetics Today, 29, 103–128. doi: 10.1215/03335372-2007-019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopgood, S. (2006). Keepers of the flame: Understanding Amnesty International. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2017). Virtual, visible, and actionable: Data assemblages and the sightlines of justice. Big Data & Society, 4, 1–15. doi: 10.1177/2053951717724477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahler, M. (2015). Networked politics: Agency, power, and governance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keats, P. A. (2005). Vicarious witnessing in European concentration camps: Imagining the trauma of another. Traumatology, 11, 171–187. doi: 10.1177/153476560501100303
   Google Scholar
• Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, H., & Engebretsen, M. (eds.). (2019). Data visualization in society. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, H., & Hill, R. L. (2017). The feeling of numbers: Emotions in everyday engagements with data and their visualisation. Sociology, 52(4), 830–848. doi: 10.1177/0038038516674675
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., & Lauriault, T. (2018). Towards critical data studies: Charting and unpacking data assemblages and their work. In J. Thatcher, A. Shears, & J. Eckert (Eds.), Thinking big data in geography: New regimes, new research (pp. 3–20). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2011). Computing Krippendorff’s Alpha-reliability (p. 12). Philadelphia, PA: Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakidou, M. (2015). Media witnessing: Exploring the audience of distant suffering. Media, Culture & Society, 37, 215–231. doi: 10.1177/0163443714557981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land, M. B. (2009). Networked activism. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 22, 205–243.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. (C. Porter, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, J. (2009). Scientific witness, testimony, and mediation. In P. Frosh & A. Pinchevski (Eds.), Media witnessing: Testimony in the age of mass communication (pp. 182–197). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Liss, A. (1998). Distant witnessing. Afterimage: The Journal of Media Arts and Cultural Criticism, 26(3), 3.
   Google Scholar
• Liss, A. (2000). Artifactual testimonies and the stagings of Holocaust memory. In R. I. Simon, S. Rosenberg, & C. Eppert (Eds.), Between hope and despair: Pedagogy and the remembrance of historical trauma (pp. 117–133). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D., & Williamson, B. (2017). The datafied child: The dataveillance of children and implications for their rights. New Media & Society, 19, 780–794. doi: 10.1177/1461444816686328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, A. (2017). Machine learners: Archaeology of a data practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. (2012). Material participation: Technology, the environment and everyday publics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. (2017). Digital sociology: The reinvention of social research. London: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martini, M. (2018). Online distant witnessing and live-streaming activism: Emerging differences in the activation of networked publics. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4035–4055. doi: 10.1177/1461444818766703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattern, S. (forthcoming). Small, moving parts: A century of fiches, fairs, and fantasies.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, E. (2012). Digital human rights reporting by civilian witnesses: Surmounting the verification barrier. In R. A. Lind (Ed.), Produsing theory in a digital world 2.0: The intersection of audiences and production in contemporary theory (pp. 193–209). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Milan, S., & Velden, L. v. d. (2016). The alternative epistemologies of data activism. Digital Culture & Society, 2, 57–74. doi: 10.14361/dcs-2016-0205
   Google Scholar
• Moats, D. (2017). From media technologies to mediated events: A different settlement between media studies and science and technology studies. Information, Communication & Society, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1410205
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen, M. (2015). Connective witnessing: Reconfiguring the relationship between the individual and the collective. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 1393–1406. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1061574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyn, S. (2012). The last utopia: Human rights in history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moyn, S. (2014). Human rights and the uses of history. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Parks, L. (2009). Digging into Google Earth: An analysis of ‘Crisis in Darfur.’ Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 40, 535–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, J. D. (2001). Witnessing. Media, Culture & Society, 23, 707–723. doi: 10.1177/016344301023006002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, J. (1981). Amnesty International: The human rights story. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ron, J., Ramos, H., & Rodgers, K. (2005). Transnational information politics: NGO human rights reporting, 1986–2000. International Studies Quarterly, 49, 557–587. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2005.00377.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppert, E., Isin, E., & Bigo, D. (2017). Data politics. Big Data & Society, 4, 1–7. doi: 10.1177/2053951717717749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz, T. (2012). Digital labor. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schuppli, S. (2014). Material witness [Video]. Retrieved from http://susanschuppli.com/exhibition/material-witness-2/
   Google Scholar
• Selander, L., & Jarvenpaa, S. (2016). Digital action repertories and transforming a social movement organization. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 40, 331–352. doi: 10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.2.03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seltzer, W., & Anderson, M. (2001). The dark side of numbers: The role of population data systems in human rights abuses. Social Research, 68, 481–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (2011). Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stambolieva, E. (2017). Methodology: Detecting online abuse against women MPs on Twitter. London: Amnesty International.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7, 111–134. doi: 10.1287/isre.7.1.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verran, H. (2015). Enumerated entities in public policy and governance. In E. Davis, & P. J. Davis (Eds.), Mathematics, Substance and Surmise (pp. 365–379). New York: Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Vestergaard, A. (2008). Humanitarian branding and the media: The case of Amnesty International. Journal of Language and Politics, 7, 471–493. doi: 10.1075/jlp.7.3.07ves
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner-Pacifici, R. (2005). The art of surrender: Decomposing sovereignty at conflict's end. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Weizman, E. (2017). Forensic architecture: Violence at the threshold of detectability. New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Weizman, E., & Weizman, I. (2014). Before and after: Documenting the architecture of disaster. Moscow: Strelka Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, W. H. (2012). Internal affairs: How the structure of NGOs transforms human rights. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S. (1990). Configuring the user: The case of usability trials. The Sociological Review, 38, 58–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03349.x
   Google Scholar
• Zeitlin, F. I. (1998). The vicarious witness: Belated memory and authorial presence in recent Holocaust literature. History and Memory, 10, 5–42.
   Google Scholar