Extra-activism: counter-mapping and data justice

References

• Borrows, J. (1999). Sovereignty’s alchemy: An analysis of Delgamuukw v. British Columbia. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 39, 537–596.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, I., Didier, E., & Vitale, T. (2014). Statactivism: Forms of action between disclosure and affirmation. Partecipazione e Conflitto: The Open Journal of Sociopolitical Studies. PACO, Issue, 7(2), 198–220.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, J., & Wood, D. (2015). Weaponizing maps: Indigenous peoples and counterinsurgency in the Americas. New York: The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cardinal, H. (1969). The unjust society. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chapin, M., Lamb, Z., & Threlkeld, B. (2005). Mapping indigenous lands. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 619–638. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane, D. T. (2019). Corporations don’t seem to understand Indigenous jurisdiction. The Conversation. January 16.
   Google Scholar
• Concepción, C. (2014). The use of computerized GIS mapping systems in the struggle for environmental justice. In R. Eglash, J. Croissant, G. Di Chiro, & R. Fouché (Eds.), Appropriating technology: Vernacular science and social power (pp. 253–264). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza-Chock, S. (2014). Out of the shadows into the streets: Transmedia organizing and the immigrant rights movement. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza-Chock, S. (2018). Data and discrimination. Plenary presentation, data justice conference: Exploring social justice in an age of datafication. University of Cardiff.
   Google Scholar
• Coulthard, G. (2014). Red skin, white masks: Rejecting the colonial politics of recognition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, C., & Stallman, T. (2018). Counter-mapping data science. The Canadian Geographer/Le Geographe Canadien, 62(1), 95–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collective, Counter Cartographies , Dalton, C., & Mason-Deese, L. (2012). Counter (mapping) actions: Mapping As militant research. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 11(3), 439–466.
   Google Scholar
• DeRogatis, A. (2003). Moral geography: Maps, missionaries and the American frontier. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• di Chiro, G. (2004). Local actions, global visions: Remaking environmental expertise. In R. Eglash, J. Croissant, G. di Chiro, & R. Fouche (Eds.), Appropriating technology: vernacular science and social power (pp. 225–252). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte, M. (2017). Connected activism: Indigenous uses of social media for shaping political change. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 21, 1–12. doi: 10.3127/ajis.v21i0.1525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer-Witheford, N. (2008). For a compositional analysis of the multitude. In W. Bonefeld (Ed.), Subverting the present, imagining the future, class struggle, commons (pp. 247–266). Brooklyn, NY: Autonomedia.
   Google Scholar
• Eades, G. (2015). Maps and memes: Redrawing culture, place and identity in indigenous communities. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, A. (2015). The colonialism of the present: An interview with Glen Coulthard. Jacobin. 2015: 1. Retrieved https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/01/indigenous-left-glen-coulthard-interview/
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, M. (2011). Looking back – and looking ahead – 35 years after the Inuit land use and occupancy project. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien, 55(1), 20–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0064.2010.00341.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, C. (2004). How did colonialism dispossess? Comments from an edge of empire. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(1), 165–182. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09401009.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, G. (2012). Stop the BC treaty process. Vancouver: Warrior Publications. Retrieved from WarriorPublications.wordpress.com
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, D. (2015). we can live without gold, but we can’t live without water. In M. Huff, & A. Roth (Eds.), Project censored 2015: Inspiring we the people (pp. 223–243). New York: Seven Stories Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, M. (2015). Debriefing elsipogtog: The anatomy of a struggle. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, D. (2016). Extra-activism. Peace Review, 28(1), 1–9. doi: 10.1080/10402659.2016.1130365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, N. (2013). Dancing the world into being: A conversation with idle no more’s leanne Simpson. Yes Magazine. March 5. Retrieved. http://www.yesmagazine.org/peace-justice/dancing-the-world-into-being-a-conversation-with-idle-no-more-leanne-simpson
   Google Scholar
• Manuel, A. (2015). Unsettling Canada: A national wake-up call. Toronto: Between the Lines Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCall, S. (2011). First person plural: Aboriginal storytelling and the ethics of collaborative authorship. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milan, S., & van der Velden, L. (2016). The alternative epistemologies of data activism. Digital Culture & Society, 2(2), 57–74. doi:10.14361/dcs-2016-0205
   Google Scholar
• Monet, D., & Skanu’u, (Wilson, A.). (1992). Colonialism on trial: Indigenous land rights and the Gitksan and wet’suwet’en sovereignty case. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, B. (2017). Activists in B.C. gear up for ‘the next standing rock’ with tiny house protest. CBC News. Sept. 7. Retrieved https://www.cbc.ca/news/indigenous/kinder-morgan-pipeline-activists-tiny-houses-1.4279740
   Google Scholar
• Nahanni, P. (1977). The mapping project. In M. Watkins (Ed.), Dene nation: The colony within (pp. 21–27). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, L., & Young, L. (2014). Generating rights for communities harmed by mining: legal and other action. Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue canadienne d'études du développement, 34(1), 96–110. doi: 10.1080/02255189.2013.761954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuttall, M. (2008). Aboriginal participation, consultation, and Canada’s Mackenzie gas project. Energy & Environment, 19(5), 617–634. doi: 10.1260/095830508784815900
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, B. (2018, December 2). The ongoing fight to shut down the enbridge Line 9 pipeline. Rabble. Retrieved http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/brent-patterson/2018/12/ongoing-fight-shut-down-enbridge-line-9-pipeline
   Google Scholar
• Peluso, N. (1995). Whose woods are these? counter-mapping forest territories in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Antipode, 27(4), 383–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.1995.tb00286.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piper, L. (2007). Subterranean bodies: Mining the large lakes of North-west Canada, 1921-1960. Environment and History, 13(2), 155–186. doi: 10.3197/096734007780473500
   Google Scholar
• Renzi, R., & Langlois, G. (2015). Data activism. In G. Elmer, G. Langlois, & J. Redden (Eds.), Compromised data: New paradigms in social media theory and methods (pp. 202–225). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Scobie, W., & Rodgers, K. (2013). Contestations of resource extraction projects via digital media in two Nunavutcommunities. Études/Inuit/Studies, 37(2), 83–101. doi: 10.7202/1025711ar
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, L. B. (2017). As we have always done: Indigenous freedom through radical resistance. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sluyter, A. (2001). Colonialism and landscape in the Americas: Material/conceptual transformations and continuing consequences. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(2), 410–429. doi: 10.1111/0004-5608.00251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. (2016). Governing data and data for governance: The everyday practice of Indigenous sovereignty. In T. Kukutai, & J. Taylor (Eds.), Indigenous data sovereignty. Canberra: Australian National University Press. Retrieved https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1q1crgf.14
   Google Scholar
• Sub-Media. (2017, December 6). Mi’kmaq resistance: Defend the sacred. Retrieved https://vimeo.com/submediatv.
   Google Scholar
• Svampa, M. (2015). The ‘commodities consensus’ and valuation languages in Latin America. Alternautas, 2(1), 49.
   Google Scholar
• Tesar, A. (2016). Treaty 11. The Canadian encyclopedia. Retrieved https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/treaty-11/
   Google Scholar
• Usher, P. (2003). Environment, race and nation reconsidered: reflections on Aboriginal land claims in Canada. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe canadien, 47(4), 365–382.
   Google Scholar
• West Coast Environmental Law Association. (2017). Brief on legal risks for Trans Mountain.
   Google Scholar
• Willow, A. (2013). Doing sovereignty in native North America: Anishinaabe counter-mapping and the struggle for land-based self-determination. Human Ecology, 41, 871–884. doi: 10.1007/s10745-013-9593-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willow, A. (2016). Indigenous ExtrACTIVISM in Boreal Canada: Colonial legacies, contemporary struggles and sovereign futures. Humanities, 5(55), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Wilt, J. (2018). Canada’s mining giants pay billions less in taxes in Canada than abroad. The Narwhal, July 16.
   Google Scholar
• Zoe-Chocolate, C. (2016). Dene mapping project. A paper presented to borders in the North, Yukon College. Retrieved http://biglobalization.org/sites/default/files/uploads/files/dene_mapping.pdf
   Google Scholar