References
- Asur, S., & Huberman, B. (2010). Predicting the future with social media. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on web intelligence and intelligent agent technology – Volume 01 (pp. 492–499). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
- Backhouse, R., & Fontaine, P. ( Eds.). (2010). The history of the social sciences since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Blumenstock, J. E., Cadamuro, G., & On, R. (2015). Predicting poverty and wealth from mobile phone Metadata. Science, 350(6264), 1073–1076. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4420
- Bowker, G., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Cole, S. (1992). Making science: Between nature and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Collins, R. (1984). Statistics versus words. Sociological Theory, 2, 329–362. doi: 10.2307/223353
- Collins, R. (1998). The sociology of Philosophies: A Global theory of Intellectual change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
- Collins, R., & Sanderson, S. (2016). Conflict sociology: A sociological classic updated. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Deaton, A., & Cartwright, N. (2018). Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials. Social Science & Medicine, 210, 2–21. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.005
- Freeman, L. (2008). Going the Wrong Way on a One-Way Street: Centrality in physics and biology. Journal of Social Structure, 9(2).
- Fuchs, S. (1992). The Professional Quest for truth: A social theory of science and knowledge. Albany: State University of New York Press.
- Fuchs, S. (2001). Against essentialism: A theory of culture and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Gebru, T., Krause, J., Wang, Y., Chen, D., Deng, J., Aiden, E., & Fei-Fei, L. (2017). Using deep learning and Google Street view to estimate the demographic makeup of neighborhoods across the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(50), 13108–13113. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1700035114
- Gellner, E. (1974). Legitimation of belief. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Giddens, A. (1991). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Gigerenzer, G., et al. (1990). The empire of chance: How probability changed science and everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Gläser, J. (2006). Wissenschaftliche Produktionsgemeinschaften: Die Soziale Ordnung der Forschung. Frankfurt: Campus.
- Golder, S., & Macy, M. (2014). Digital footprints: Opportunities and challenges for online social research. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 129–152. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043145
- Hacking, I. (1992). Statistical language, statistical truth, and statistical reason. In E. McMullin (Ed.), The social dimensions of science (pp. 130–157). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
- Hacking, I. (2009). Scientific reason. Taipei: National Taiwan University Press.
- Hargittai, E. (2015). Is bigger always better? Potential biases of big data derived from social network sites. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 659(1), 63–76. doi: 10.1177/0002716215570866
- Jean, N., Burke, M., Xie, M., Davis, W. M., Lobell, D. B., & Ermon, S. (2016). Combining satellite imagery and machine learning to predict poverty. Science, 353(6301), 790–794. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf7894
- Jungherr, A. (2016). Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(1), 72–91. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401
- Kleinberg, J., Ludwig, J., Mullainathan, S., & Obermeyer, Z. (2015). Prediction policy problems. American Economic Review, 105(5), 491–495. doi: 10.1257/aer.p20151023
- Kwa, C. (2011). Styles of knowing: A new history of science from Ancient times to the present. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Mau, S. (2019). The metric society: On the quantification of the social. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Mestyán, M., Yasseri, T., & Kertész, J. (2013). Early prediction of movie box office success based on Wikipedia activity big data. PLOS ONE, 8(8), e71226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071226
- Meyer, E. T., & Schroeder, R. (2015). Knowledge machines: Digital transformations of the sciences and humanities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Morgan, S., & Winship, C. (2015). Counterfactuals and causal inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Pearl, J., & McKenzie, D. (2018). The book of why: The new science of cause and effect. London: Allen Lane.
- Poel, M., Meyer, E. T., & Schroeder, R. (2018). Big data for policymaking: Great expectations, but with limited progress? Policy & Internet, 10, 347–367. doi: 10.1002/poi3.176
- Porter, T. (2008). Statistics and statistical methods. In T. Porter & D. Ross (Eds.), The modern social sciences (pp. 238–250). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Rule, J. (1997). Theory and Progress in social science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Salganik, M. (2018). Bit by bit: Social research in the digital age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Schroeder, R. (2018). Social theory after the internet: Media, technology and globalization. London: UCL Press.
- Schroeder, R. (2014). Big Data and the brave new world of social media research. Big Data and Society, 1(2), 1–11. doi: 10.1177/2053951714563194
- Schroeder, R. (2017). Big Data and Communication Research, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. http://communication.oxfordre.com/
- Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. London: Allen Lane.
- Steele, J., Sundsøy, P., Pezzulo, C., Alegana, V., Bird, T., Blumenstock, J., … Bengtsson, L. (2017). Mapping poverty using mobile phone and satellite data. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 14(127), 20160690. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0690
- Turow, J. (2017). The aisles have eyes: How retailers track your shopping, strip your privacy, and define your power. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Watts, D. J. (2017). Should social science be more solution-oriented? Nature Human Behavior, 1(1), 0015. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0015
- Whitley, R. (2000). The Intellectual and social organization of the sciences (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.