Ethnography’s future in the big data era

References

• Adar, E. (2015). The two cultures and big data research. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 10(3), 765–781.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders. Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. (2013). What about mozart? What about murder? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beuving, J. (2017). The anthropologist as jester; anthropology as jest? Social Anthropology, 25(3), 353–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beuving, J., & de Vries, G. (2015). Doing qualitative research. The craft of naturalistic inquiry. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borgman, C. (2015). Big data, little data, no data. Scholarship in the networked world. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data. Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Community & Society, 15(5), 662–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrows, R., & Savage, M. (2014). After the crisis? Big data and the methodological challenges of empirical sociology. Big Data & Society, 1(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714540280
   Google Scholar
• Bush, L. (2014). A dozen ways to get lost in translation: Inherent challenges in large-scale data sets. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1727–1744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., Stepner, M., Abrahams, S., Lin, S., Scuderi, B., Turner, N., … Cutler, D. (2016). The association between income and life expectancy in the United States, 2001–2014. Journal of the American Medical Association, 315(16), 1750–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, P. (2007). The bottom billion. Why poor countries are failing and what can be done about it. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, D., Miltner, K., & Gray, M. (2014). Critiquing big data: Politics, ethnics, epistemology. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1663–1672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, J. (2016). Big data or ‘big ethnographic data’? Positioning big data within the ethnographic space. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference, unnumbered (pp. 62–73).
   Google Scholar
• Cyert, R., & March, J. (1992). [1963] A behavioural theory of the firm. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, M. (2016). Close reading big data. The echo nest and the production of (rotten) music metadata. First Monday, 21(7).
   Google Scholar
• Erlandson, D., Harris, E., Skipper, B., & Allen, S. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry. A guide to methods. London & New York: Sage Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, H. (2014). Big data and small. Collaborations between ethnographers and data scientists. Big Data & Society, 1(2), 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2017). From digital positivism and administrative big data analytics towards critical digital and social media research. European Journal of Communication, 32(1), 37–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebru, T., Krause, J., Wang, Y., Chen, D., Deng, J., Lieberman Aiden, E., & Fei-Fei, L. (2017). Using deep learning and google street view to estimate the demographic makeup of neighbourhoods across the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(50), 13108–13113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (2017). [1973] The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point. How little things can make a big difference. New York/Boston: Back Bay Books.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (2012). [1967] The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. London: Aldine Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gobo, G. (2014). Sampling, representativeness and generalizability. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 405–425). London & New York: Sage Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Graslegger, H., & Krogerus, M. (2017). The data that turned the world upside down. Retrieved from https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/mg9vvn/how-our-likes-helped-trump-win
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action, vol. 1: Reason and rationalisation of society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halford, S., & Savage, M. (2017). Speaking sociologically with big data: Symphonic social science and the future for big data research. Sociology, 51(6), 1132–48.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. (2002). [1992] Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A., Jurgens, P., & Schoen, H. (2012). Why the pirate party won the German election of 2009 or the trouble with predictions: A response to Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sander, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. Predicting elections with twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. Social Science Computer Review, 30(2), 229–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanai, R., Feilden, T., Firth, C., & Rees, G. (2011). Political orientations are correlated with brain structure in young adults. Current Biology, 21(8), 677–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry. Methodology for behavioural science. San Francisco: Chandler.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, R. (2004). Nigger. The strange career of a troublesome word. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. (2014). Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 1(1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Köbben, A. (1952). New ways of presenting an old idea: The statistical method in social anthropology. Man/JRAI, 82(2), 129–146.
   Google Scholar
• Korngiebel, D., Taualii, M., Forquera, R., Harris, R., & Buchwald, D. (2015). Addressing the challenges of research with small populations. American Journal of Public Health, 105(9), 1744–1747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosinski, M., Matz, S., Gosling, S., Popov, V., & Stillwell, D. (2015). Facebook as a research tool for the social sciences. Opportunities, challenges, ethical considerations, and practical guidelines. American Psychologist, 70(6), 543–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. (2010). Netnography. Doing ethnographic research online. New York: Sage Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kung, K., Greco, K., Sobolevsky, S., Ratti, C., & Ramasco, J. J (2014). Exploring universal patterns in human home-work commuting from mobile phone data. PLOS-One, 9(6), e96180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Kraus, G. (2016, January 12). The trials of Alice Goffman. New York Times Magazine.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2015). Digital sociology. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. London: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction. How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Pepi, M. (2013, December 30). The postmodernity of big data, The New Inquiry. Retrieved from https://thenewinquiry.com/the-postmodernity-of-big-data/
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital ethnography. Principles and practice. New York: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S., Ruckenstein, M., Willim, R., & Duque, M. (2018). Broken data: Conceptualising data in an emerging world. Big Data & Society, 5(1), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yanow, Y. (2012). Interpretive research design. Concepts and processes. New York & London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens-Davidowitz, S. (2014). The cost of racial animus on a black candidate: Evidence using Google search data. Journal of Public Economics, 118, 26–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens-Davidowitz, S. (2017). Everybody lies. Big data, new data, and what the internet can tell us about who we really are. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. (2016). Before theory comes theorizing or how to make social science more interesting. The British Journal of Sociology, 67(1), 5–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taleb, N. (2012). Anti-fragile. Things that gain from disorder. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Taleb, N. (2013). Beware the big errors of ‘big data’. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2013/02/big-data-means-big-errors-people
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. (2011). Alone, together. Why we expect more from technology and less from ourselves. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, T. (2013, May 13). Big data needs thick data. Ethnography Matters. Retrieved from http://ethnographymatters.net/2013/05/13/big-data-needs-thick-data/
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. New York: Allen Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, P. (2000). The ethnographic imagination. London: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, J. (1990). The fly on the wall of the inner sanctum: Observing company directors at work. In G. Moyser & M. Wagstaffe (Eds.), Research methods for elite studies (pp. 129–146). London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Wright-Mills, C. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar