The social academic: a social capital approach to academic relationship management on social media

References

• Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Barjak, F. (2006). The role of the internet in informal scholarly communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(10), 1350–1367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1999). World risk society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (1999). Measuring impression management in organizations: A scale development based on the Jones and Pittman taxonomy. Organizational Research Methods, 2(2), 187–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, second life, and beyond. From production to produsage. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, E. M., & Marmo, J. (2009). Relational maintenance strategies on Facebook. The Kentucky Journal of Communication, 28(2), 129–150.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 339–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, S. W., & Blackburn, R. T. (1981). Sponsorship and academic career success. The Journal of Higher Education, 52(4), 369–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donath, J. S., & Boyd, D. (2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastin, M., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(1). doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00110.x
   Google Scholar
• Ebersbach, A., Glaser, M., & Heigl, R. (2008). Social Web. Konstanz: UVK/UTB.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13(6), 873–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, G. R., & Judge, T. A. (1991). Personnel/human resources management: A political influence perspective. Journal of Management, 17(2), 447–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forret, M. L., & Dougherty, T. W. (2001). Correlates of networking behavior for managerial and professional employees. Group & Organization Management, 26(3), 283–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedkin, N. E. (1982). Information flow through strong and weak ties in intraorganizational social networks. Social Networks, 3(4), 273–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gläser, J. (2001). Macrostructures, careers and knowledge production: A neoinstitutionalist approach. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(7/8), 689–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, S., & Penley, L. E. (1984). Career strategies and salary progression: A study of their relationships in a municipal bureaucracy. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34(2), 244–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhow, C., & Gleason, B. (2014). Social scholarship: Reconsidering scholarly practices in the age of social media. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 392–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruzd, A., Staves, K., & Wilk, A. (2012). Connected scholars: Examining the role of social media in research practices of faculty using the UTAUT model. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2340–2350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C. (2002). Strong, weak, and latent ties and the impact of new media. The Information Society, 18(5), 385–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg, K., & Thelwall, M. (2014). Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1027–1042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 146–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamali, H. R., Nicholas, D., & Herman, E. (2016). Scholarly reputation in the digital age and the role of emerging platforms and mechanisms. Research Evaluation, 25(1), 37–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, K., & Weller, M. (2018). Academics and social networking sites: Benefits, problems and tensions in professional engagement with online networking. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(1), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kieslinger, B. (2015). Academic peer pressure in social media: Experiences from the heavy, the targeted and the restricted user. First Monday, 20(6). doi: 10.5210/fm.v20i6.5854
   Google Scholar
• Krämer, N. C., & Winter, S. (2008). Impression management 2.0. Journal of Media Psychology, 20(3), 106–116.
   Google Scholar
• Lasorsa, D. L., Lewis, S. C., & Holton, A. (2012). Normalizing Twitter: Journalism practice in an emerging communication space. Journalism Studies, 13(1), 19–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, N. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28–51.
   Google Scholar
• Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2017). Exploring digital scholarship. A study on use of social media for scholarly communication among Italian academics. In A. Esposito (Ed.), Research 2.0 and the impact of digital technologies on scholarly inquiry (pp. 116–141). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matzat, U. (2004). Academic communication and internet discussion groups: Transfer of information or creation of social contacts? Social Networks, 26(3), 221–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meishar-Tal, H., & Pieterse, E. (2017). Why do academics use academic social networking sites? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Münch, R. (2014). Academic capitalism. Universities in the global struggle for excellence. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Muscanell, N., & Utz, S. (2017). Social networking for scientists: An analysis on how and why academics use ResearchGate. Online Information Review, 41(5), 744–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nández, G., & Borrego, A. (2013). Use of social networks for academic purposes: A case study. The Electronic Library, 31(6), 781–791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas, D., Herman, E., Jamali, H., Rodriguez-Bravo, B., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Dobrowolski, T., & Pouchot, S. (2015). New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation. Learned Publishing, 28(3), 169–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas, D., & Rowlands, I. (2011). Social media use in the research workflow. Information Services & Use, 31(1/2), 61–83.
   Google Scholar
• Nuernbergk, C., & Conrad, J. (2016). Conversations and campaign dynamics in a hybrid media environment: Use of Twitter by members of the German Bundestag. Social Media+Society, 2(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brian, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality and Quantity, 41(5), 673–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponte, D., & Simon, J. (2011). Scholarly communication 2.0: Exploring researcher’s opinions on web 2.0 for scientific knowledge creation, evaluation and dissemination. Serials Review, 37(3), 149–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, D. J. de S. (1971). Some remarks on elitism in information and the invisible college phenomenon in science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 22(2), 74–75.
   Google Scholar
• Pscheida, D., Minet, C., Herbst, S., Albrecht, S., & Köhler, T. (2014). Nutzung von Social Media und onlinebasierten Anwendungen in der Wissenschaft Ergebnisse des Science 2.0-Survey 2014. Retrieved from https://d-nb.info/1069096679/34
   Google Scholar
• Radovanovic, D., & Ragnedda, M. (2012). Small talk in the digital age: Making sense of phatic posts. In M. Rowe, M. Stankovic, & A.-S. Dadzie (Eds.), Proceedings of the WWW’12 workshop on making sense of microposts (Vol. 838, pp. 10–13). Lyon, France: CEUR Workshop Proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• Rajagopal, L., Brinke, D. J., Van Bruggen, J., & Sloep, P. B. (2012). Understanding personal learning networks: Their structure, content and the networking skills needed to optimally use them. First Monday, 17(1). doi: 10.5210/fm.v17i1.3559
   Google Scholar
• Skeels, M. M., & Grudin, J. (2009). When social networks cross boundaries: A case study of workplace use of Facebook and LinkedIn. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on supporting group work (pp. 95–104). New York, NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32(11), 1492–1512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistisches Bundesamt. (2015). Bildung und Kultur. Personal an Hochschulen - Vorläufige Ergebnisse. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanone, M. A., Lackaff, D., & Rosen, D. (2010). The relationship between traditional mass media and ‘social media’: Reality television as a model for SNS behavior. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 54(3), 508–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinfield, C., DiMicco, J. M., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2009). Bowling online: Social networking and social capital within the organization. In C&T ‘09 Proceedings of the fourth international conference on communities and technologies (pp. 245–254). University Park, PA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, B. E. (2015). In abundance: Networked participatory practices as scholarship. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 318–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2015). Researchgate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring scholarship? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(5), 876–889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Noorden, R. (2014). Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network. Nature, 512, 126–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2012). Networked participatory scholarship: Emergent techno-cultural pressures toward open and digital scholarship in online networks. Computers & Education, 58(2), 766–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., & Ramirez, A. Jr. (2010). New technologies and new directions in online relating. In S. W. Smith & S. R. Wilson (Eds.), New directions in interpersonal communication research (pp. 264–284). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wirth, W., Matthes, J., Mögerle, U., & Prommer, E. (2005). Traumberuf oder Verlegenheitslösung?. Publizistik, 50(3), 320–343.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, H.-G., & Moser, K. (2006). Entwicklung und Validierung einer Networkingskala. Diagnostica, 52, 161–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J. (2009, April 10). 10 high-fliers on Twitter. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/10-High-Fliers-on-Twitter/16488/
   Google Scholar