Micro-platformization for digital activism on social media

References

• Ackerman, S., Gleason, N., & Gonzales, R. (2015). Using rapid ethnography to support the design and implementation of health information technologies. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 215, 14–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bärtl, M. (2018). Youtube channels, uploads and views: A statistical analysis of the past 10 years. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 24(1), 16–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, S. (2018). Anxiety, panic and self- optimization: Inequalities and the YouTube algorithm. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 24(1), 69–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brighenti, A. (2007). Visibility: A category for the social sciences. Current Sociology, 55(3), 323–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, A., Moon, B., Münch, F., & Sadkowsky, T. (2017). The Australian Twittersphere in 2016: Mapping the follower/followee network. Social Media + Society, October-December, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, S., & Craig, D. (2016). Online entertainment: A New wave of media globalization? International Journal of Communication, 10(2016), 5409–5425.
   Google Scholar
• Dourish, P., & Gómez Cruz, E. G. (2018). Datafication and data fiction: Narrating data and narrating with data. Big Data & Society, 1–10. doi: 10.1177/2053951718784083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferdinands, B. (2016). Drink this tea and look like me. (Honours), University of Sydney, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, H. (2014). Big Data and Small: Collaboration between ethnographers and data scientists. Big Data & Society, 1(2), 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2017). From cyber-autonomism to cyber-populism: An ideological history of digital activism. Triple C: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 15(2), 478–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media and Society, 12(3), 347–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167–194). Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• González-Bailón, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., Rivero, A., & Moreno, Y. (2011). The dynamics of protest Recruitment through an online network. Scientific Reports, 1(197). doi: 10.1038/srep00197
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Helmond, A. (2015). The platformization of the web: Making web data platform ready. Social Media + Society. doi: 10.1177/2056305115603080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, J. (2017). Participation in media Organizations. In Cultural intermediaries: Audience participation and media organisations (pp. 87–106). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, J., Martin, F., & Sinpeng, A. (2017). Towards ethically responsible social media research. In M. Zimmer & K. Kinder-Kurlanda (Eds.), Internet research Ethics for the social Age: New cases and challenges (pp. 57–74). London: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, J. (2019). Digital First Personality: Automation and influence within evolving media ecologies. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. Accepted for publication 31 May 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatzogiani, A. (2015). Firebrand waves of digital activism 1994–2014. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. K. (2018). Understanding perception of algorithmic decisions: Fairness, trust, and emotion in response to algorithmic management. Big Data & Society. doi: 10.1177/2053951718756684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomas, Natasha. (2018). Unilever warns social media to clean up “toxic” content. TechCrunch. Retrieved from https://techcrunch.com/2018/02/12/unilever-warns-social-media-to-clean-up-toxic-content/.
   Google Scholar
• Meikle, G. (2016). Social media: Communication, sharing and visibility. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Millen, D. R. (2000). Rapid ethnography: time deepening strategies for HCI field research. Paper presented at the Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, New York City.
   Google Scholar
• Napoli, P. (1999). The marketplace of ideas metaphor in communications regulation. Journal of Communication, 49(4), 151–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neilsen, L. (2011). Personas – user focused design. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, B., Smith, K., & Warren, S. (2015). Revealing and Revaluing Cultural Intermediaries in the ‘Real’ Creative City: Insights from a dairy keeping exercise. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(6), 724–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, J., & Hutchinson, J. (2018). Algorithms and public service media. In G. Lowe, H. V. d. Bulck, & K. Donders (Eds.), RIPE@2017 (pp. 91–106). Göteborg: Nordicom.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2014). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1), 2–14.
   Google Scholar
• Vromen, A. (2017). Diffusion and sharing in the advocacy organisation sector. In Digital citizenship and political engagement: The challenge from online campaigning and advocacy organisations (pp. 191–223). London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfson, T. (2014). Digital rebellion: The birth of the cyber left. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar