Queer information literacies: social and technological circulation in the rural Midwestern United States

References

• Birnholtz, J., Fitzpatrick, C., Handel, M., & Brubaker, J. (2014). Identity, identification and identifiability: The language of self-presentation on a location-based mobile dating app. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices & services (pp. 3–12). Toronto, ON, Canada: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell, C., Birnholtz, J., & Abbott, C. (2015). Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app. New Media and Society, 17(7), 1117–1136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwell, L., Hardy, J., Ammari, T., Veinot, T., Lampe, C., & Schoenebeck, S. (2016). LGBT parents and social media: Advocacy, privacy, and disclosure during shifting social movements. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 610–622). San Jose, California, USA: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Boso, L. A. (2012). Urban bias, rural sexual minorities, and courts’ role in addressing discrimination. The Williams Institute. Retrieved from http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Boso-Urban-Bias-Rural-Sexual-Minorities-05.09.12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brubaker, J., Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2016). Departing glances: A sociotechnical account of ‘leaving’ Grindr. New Media & Society, 18(3), 373–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crooks, R. (2013). The rainbow flag and the green carnation: Grindr in the gay village. First Monday, 18(11).
   Google Scholar
• Dame, A. (2016). Making a name for yourself: Tagging as transgender ontological practice on Tumblr. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 33(1), 23–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhoest, A., & Szulc, L. (2016). Navigating online selves: Social, cultural, and material contexts of social media use by diasporic gay men. Social Media & Society, 2(4), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dourish, P. (2006). Implications for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 541–550). Montréal, Québec, Canada: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Elmborg, J. (2006). Critical information literacy: Implications for instructional practice. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(2), 192–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. S. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, C., Birnholtz, J., & Brubaker, J. (2015). Social and personal disclosure in a location-based real time dating app. In Proceedings of the 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1983–1992). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, G. J. (2014). LGBT demographics: Comparisons among population-based surveys. The Williams Institute. Retrieved from http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/LGBT-demogs-sep-2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gates, G. J., & Cooke, A. (2010). United States census snapshot. The Williams Institute. Retrieved from http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Census2010Snapshot-US-v2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, E., Karahalios, K., & Sandvig, C. (2008). The network in the garden: An empirical analysis of social media in rural life. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1603–1612). Florence, Italy: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, M. L. (2009). Out in the country: Youth, media, and queer visibility in rural America. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gudelunas, D. (2012). There’s an app for that: The uses and gratifications of online social networks for gay men. Sexuality & Culture, 16, 347–365.
   Google Scholar
• Haimson, O., Brubaker, J., Dombrowski, L., & Hayes, G. (2015). Disclosure, stress, and support during gender transition on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 1176–1190). Vancouver, BC, Canada: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, J., & Lindtner, S. (2017). Constructing a desiring user: Discourse, rurality, and design in location-based social networks. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 13–25). Portland, OR, USA: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, J. (1999). Men like that: A southern queer history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kazyak, E. (2011). Disrupting cultural selves: Constructing gay and lesbian identities in rural locales. Qualitative Sociology, 34, 561–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingel, J., & Golub, A. (2015). In face on Facebook: Brooklyn’s drag community and sociotechnical practices of online communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 536–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, A. (2010). Framing information literacy as information practice: Site ontology and practice theory. Journal of Documentation, 66(2), 245–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2011). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Montiel-Overall, P. (2007). Information literacy: Toward a cultural model. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 31(1), 43–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, S., & Ankerson, M. S. (2016). Lez takes time: Designing lesbian contact in geosocial networking apps. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 33(1), 53–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin, A., & Duggan, M. (2015). Americans’ internet access: 2000–2015. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2013). A survey of LGBT Americans: Attitudes, experiences and values in changing times.
   Google Scholar
• Renninger, B. (2015). “Where I can be myself … where I can speak my mind”: Networked counterpublics in a polymedia environment. New Media & Society, 17(9), 1513–1529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, M. J., & Thomas, R. J. (2012). Searching for a mate: The rise of the internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77(4), 523–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, Y. (2014). Locating the “scruff guy”: Theorizing body and space in gay geosocial media. International Journal of Communication, 8, 2113–2133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salemink, K., Strijker, D., & Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 360–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuominen, K., Savolainen, R., & Talja, S. (2005). Information literacy as a sociotechnical practice. The Library Quarterly, 75(3), 329–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van De Wiele, C., & Tong, S. (2014). Breaking boundaries: The uses & gratifications of Grindr. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 619–630). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar