1,692
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Friendship and politics don’t mix? The role of sociability for online political talk

ORCID Icon
Pages 118-133 | Received 13 Feb 2019, Accepted 15 Jun 2019, Published online: 02 Jul 2019

References

  • Boczkowski, P. J., Matassi, M., & Mitchelstein, E. (2018). How young users deal with multiple platforms: The role of meaning-making in social media repertories. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(5), 245–259.
  • Dahlgren, P. (2002). In search of the talkative public: Media, deliberative democracy and civic culture. The Public, 9(3), 1–22.
  • Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. New York, NY: Holt.
  • Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ellison, N., & boyd, d. (2013). Sociality through social network sites. In W. H. Dutton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of internet studies (pp. 151–172). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Eveland, W. P., Morey, A. C., & Hutchens, M. J. (2011). Beyond deliberation: New directions for the study of informal political conversation from a communication perspective. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1082–1103.
  • Gastil, J. (2008). Political communication and deliberation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Graham, T. (2015). Everyday political talk in the internet-based public sphere. In S. Coleman & D. Freelon (Eds.), Handbook of digital politics (pp. 247–263). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
  • Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431.
  • Katz, E. (2006). Rediscovering Gabriel Tarde. Political Communication, 23(3), 263–270.
  • Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Tenenboim, O. (Forthcoming). Sustained journalist-audience reciprocity in a meso-newspace: The case of a journalistic WhatsApp group. New Media & Society.
  • Lane, D. S., Das, V., & Hiaeshutter-Rice, D. (2018). Civic laboratories: Youth political expression in anonymous, ephemeral, geo-bounded social media. Information, Communication & Society, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1477973
  • Mor, Y., Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Maoz, I. (2015). Political expression on Facebook in a context of conflict: Dilemmas and coping strategies of Jewish-Israeli youth. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 1–10.
  • Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Papacharissi, Z. (2004). Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media & Society, 6(2), 259–283.
  • Pew Research Center. (2018, November 5). More now say it’s ‘stressful’ to discuss politics with people they disagree with. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2018/11/05/more-now-say-its-stressful-to-discuss-politics-with-people-they-disagree-with/
  • Renninger, B. J. (2015). ‘Where I can be myself … where I can speak my mind’: Networked counterpublics in a polymedia environment. New Media & Society, 17(9), 1513–1529.
  • Schneider, T. (2015, January 5). My first WhatsApp group (Hebrew). The Plog: Tal Schneider’s Political Blog. Retrieved from http://www.talschneider.com/2015/01/05/theplogwhatsapp/
  • Schrock, A. R. (2015). Communicative affordances of mobile media: Portability, availability, locatability, and multimediality. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1229–1246.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Procedures and techniques for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Sunstein, C. (2012). The daily we: Is the internet really a blessing for democracy? In R. P. Yagelsi & R. K. Miller (Eds.), The informed argument (pp. 387–398). Belmont, MA: Wadsworth.
  • Thorson, K., Vraga, E., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2015). Don’t push your opinions on me: Young people and political etiquette on Facebook. In J. Hendricks & D. Schill (Eds.), Presidential campaigning and social media (pp. 74–93). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Toepfl, F., & Piwoni, E. (2015). Public spheres in interaction: Comment sections of news websites as counterpublic spaces. Journal of Communication, 65, 465–488.
  • Valeriani, A., & Vaccari, C. (2018). Political talk on mobile instant messaging services: A comparative analysis of Germany, Italy, and the UK. Information, Communication, & Society, 21(11), 1715–1731.
  • Van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2014). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1), 2–14.
  • Vidal, E., Ziv, A., & Orpaz, I. (2015, December 29). Tech nation: WhatsApp top Israeli mobile app, poll finds. Haaretz.com. Retrieved from http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/business/.premium-1.694289
  • Vraga, E. K., Thorson, K., Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Gee, E. (2015). How individual sensitivities to disagreement shape youth political expression on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 281–289.
  • Vromen, A., Loader, B. D., Xenos, M. A., & Bailo, F. (2016). Everyday making through Facebook engagement: Young citizens’ political interactions in Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States. Political Studies, 64(3), 513–533.
  • Walsh, K. C. (2004). Talking about politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Wojcieszak, M. E., & Mutz, D. C. (2009). Online groups and political discourse: Do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement? Journal of Communication, 59(1), 40–56.
  • Wright, S. (2012). From “third place” to “third space”: Everyday political talk in non-political online spaces. Javnost – The Public, 19(3), 5–20.
  • Wyatt, R. O., Katz, E., & Kim, J. (2000). Bridging the spheres: Political and personal conversation in public and private spaces. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 71–92.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.