Live democracy and its tensions: making sense of livestreaming in the 15M and Occupy

References

• Andén-Papadopoulos, K. (2013). Media witnessing and the ‘crowd-sourced video revolution’. Visual Communication, 12(3), 341–357. doi: 10.1177/1470357213483055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askanius, T. (2013). Online video activism and political mash-up genres. JOMEC Journal: Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Barassi, V. (2015). Activism on the web: Everyday struggles against digital capitalism. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, B. R. (2013). Action! Livestreaming as means of civic engagement: A case study of citizen journalism in Egypt and Syria. Glocal Times, 19, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Birchall, C. (2011). Introduction to “secrecy and transparency”: The politics of opacity and openness. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(7-8), 7–25. doi: 10.1177/0263276411427744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpentier, N. (2011). Media and participation: A site of ideological-democratic struggle. Bristol and Chicago: Intellect. Kindle Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, G. (2014). Hacker, hoaxer, whistleblower, spy: The many faces of anonymous. London and New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza-Chock, S. (2012). Mic check! Media cultures and the Occupy movement. Social Movement Studies, 11(3-4), 375–385. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2012.710746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. (2015). Social movements in times of austerity: Bringing capitalism back into protest analysis. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., & Mattoni, A. (2013). Cultures of participation in social movements. In A. Delwiche & J. Jacobs Henderson (Eds.), The handbook of participatory cultures (pp. 171–182). London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dencik, L., & Cable, J. (2017). The advent of surveillance realism: Public opinion and activist responses to the Snowden leaks. International Journal of Communication, 11, 763–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flesher Fominaya, C. (2010). Collective identity in social movements: Central concepts and debates. Sociology Compass, 4(6), 393–404. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00287.x
   Google Scholar
• Fusch, P. I., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408–1416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2017a). The mask and the flag: Populism, citizenism and global protest. London: Hurst.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2017b). Feeds from the square: Live streaming, live tweeting and the self-representation of protest camps. In G. Brown, A. Feigenbaum, F. Frenzel, & P. McCurdy (Eds.), Protest camps in international context: Spaces, infrastructures and media of resistance (pp. 91–108). Bristol and Chicago: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, S. (2015). Ubiquitous witnesses: Who creates the evidence and the live(d) experience of human rights violations? Information, Communication & Society, 18(11), 1378–1392. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1070891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchby, I. (2001). Conversation and Technology: From the Telephone to the Internet. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. (1997). The art of moral protest: Culture, biography, and creativity in social movements. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Juris, J. S. (2008). Networking futures: The movements against corporate globalization. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaun, A. (2016). Crisis and critique: A brief history of media participation in times of crisis. London: Zed Books. Kindle Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Kavada, A. (2013). Internet cultures and protest movements: The cultural links between strategy, organizing and online communication. In B. Cammaerts, A. Mattoni, & P. McCurdy (Eds.), Mediation and social movements (pp. 75–94). Bristol: Intellect.
   Google Scholar
• Kelty, C. M. (2008). Two bits: The cultural significance of free software (experimental futures). Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Kindle Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Kumanyika, C. (2017). Livestreaming in the Black lives matter network. In A. Day (Ed.), DIY Utopia: Cultural imagination and the remaking of the possible (pp. 169–188). Lanham, Boulder, New York and London: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lenzner, B. (2014). The emergence of Occupy Wall Street and digital video practices: Tim Pool, live streaming and experimentations in citizen journalism. Studies in Documentary Film, 8(3), 251–266. doi: 10.1080/17503280.2014.961634
   Google Scholar
• Martini, M. (2018). Online distant witnessing and live-streaming activism: Emerging differences in the activation of networked publics. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4035–4055. doi: 10.1177/1461444818766703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattoni, A. (2012). Media practices and protest politics: How precarious workers mobilse. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Mattoni, A. (2019). I post, you rally, she tweets … and we all occupy: The challenges of hybrid spatiality in the Occupy Wall Street mobilizations. In M. Mortensen, C. Neumayer, & T. Poell (Eds.), Social media materialities and protest: Critical reflections (pp. 17–27). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCurdy, P. (2011). Theorizing “lay theories of media”: A case study of the dissent! Network at the 2005 Gleneagles G8 Summit. International Journal of Communication, 5, 619–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, K. (2004). Oneself as another: From social movement to experience movement. Current Sociology, 52(4), 575–593. doi: 10.1177/0011392104043492
   Google Scholar
• Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montero Sánchez, D., & Candón Mena, J. (2015). Sobre las imágenes del 15M. El videoactivismo como experimentación cultural y política. In F. Sierra Caballero & D. Montero Sánchez (Eds.), Videoactivismo y movimientos sociales: teoría y praxis de las multitudes conectadas (pp. 331–356). Barcelona: Gedisa.
   Google Scholar
• Occupy Wall Street. (2011a). Declaration of the occupation of New York City. Retrieved from http://occupywallstreet.net/learn
   Google Scholar
• Occupy Wall Street. (2011b). Principles of solidarity. Retrieved from http://occupywallstreet.net/learn
   Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poell, T., Rajagopalan, S., & Kavada, A. (2018). Publicness on platforms: Tracing the mutual articulation of platform architectures and user practices. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Platforms, stories, connections (pp. 43–58). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Poepsel, M. A., & Painter, C. (2016). Alternative media and normative theory: A case of Ferguson, Missouri. Communication and Media, XI(36), 89–114.
   Google Scholar
• Postill, J. (2016). Freedom technologists and the future of global justice. In N. Buxton & D. Eade (Eds.), State of power: Democracy, sovereignty and resistance (pp. 147–163). Amsterdam: The Transnational Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, W. H. Jr. (2005). Logics of history: Social theory and social transformation. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streamer Journalist Code of Ethics. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nwX_bLxV1hZU93YGtwx-6ijU1B7Ojq36ZVwZHBuPvn4/edit
   Google Scholar
• Thorburn, E. D. (2014). Social media, subjectivity, and surveillance: Moving on from occupy, the rise of live streaming video. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 11(1), 52–63. doi: 10.1080/14791420.2013.827356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorburn, E. D. (2017). Social reproduction in the live stream. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 15(2), 423–440. doi: 10.31269/triplec.v15i2.774
   Google Scholar
• Touraine, A. (1981). The voice and the eye. An analysis of social movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Treré, E., Jeppesen, S., & Mattoni, A. (2017). Comparing digital protest media imaginaries: Anti-austerity movements in Greece, Italy & Spain. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 15(2), 404–422. doi: 10.31269/triplec.v15i2.772
   Google Scholar
• Tufte, T. (2017). Communication and social change: A citizen perspective. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity Press. Kindle Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Turow, J., McGuigan, L., & Maris, E. (2015). Making data mining a natural part of life: Physical retailing, customer surveillance and the 21st century social imaginary. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4-5), 464–478. doi: 10.1177/1367549415577390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30, 75–89. doi: 10.1057/jit.2015.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar