WhatsApp political discussion, conventional participation and activism: exploring direct, indirect and generational effects

References

• American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR). (2016). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. Retrieved from http://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/publications/Standard-Definitions20169theditionfinal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bachmann, I., Kaufholf, K., Lewis, S. C., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2010). News platform preference: Advancing the effects of age and media consumption on political participation. International Journal of Internet Science, 5(1), 34–47.
   Google Scholar
• Bakardjieva, M. (2009). Subactivism: Lifeworld and politics in the age of the Internet. The Information Society, 25(2), 91–104. doi: 10.1080/01972240802701627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobrov, L. H. (2018, February 5). Mobile messaging app map [blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.similarweb.com/blog/mobile-messaging-app-map-2018
   Google Scholar
• Chan, M. (2018). Mobile-mediated multimodal communications, relationship quality and subjective well-being: An analysis of smartphone use from a life course perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 254–262. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, M., Chen, H. T., & Lee, F. L. F. (2017). Examining the roles of mobile and social media in political participation: A cross-national analysis of three Asian societies using a communication mediation approach. New Media & Society, 19(12), 2003–2021. doi: 10.1177/1461444816653190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, J., Shah, D. D., McLeod, J. M., McLeod, D. M., Scholl, R. M., & Gotlieb, M. R. (2009). Campaigns, reflection, and deliberation: Advancing an O-S-R-O-R model of communication effects. Communication Theory, 19(1), 66–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.01333.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., & Curran, J. (2003). The paradox of media power. In N. Couldry & J. Curran (Eds.), Contesting media power: Alternative media in a networked world (pp. 3–15). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Curtice, J., & Jowell, R. (1997). The skeptical electorate. In R. Jowell, J. Curtice, A. Park, L. Brook, K. Thomson, & C. Bryson (Eds.), British social attitudes: The 14th report (pp. 141–172). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, J., & Amnå, E. (2012). Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology. Human Affairs, 22(3), 283–300. doi: 10.2478/s13374-012-0024-1
   Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P. (2004). The effect of political discussion in producing informed citizens: The roles of information, motivation, and elaboration. Political Communication, 21(2), 177–193. doi: 10.1080/10584600490443877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(4), 298–320. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfw006
   Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Ardèvol-Abreu, A., Diehl, T., Patiño, M. G., & Liu, J. H. (2019). Trust in institutional actors across 22 countries. Examining political, science, and media trust around the world. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 74, 237–262. doi:10.4185/RLCS-2019-1329en
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Barnidge, M., & Diehl, T. (2018). Political persuasion on social media: A moderated moderation model of political discussion disagreement and civil reasoning. The Information Society, 34(5), 302–315. doi:10.1080/01972243.2018.1497743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Barnidge, M., & Scherman, A. (2017). Social media social capital, offline social capital, and citizenship: Exploring asymmetrical social capital effects. Political Communication, 34(1), 44–68. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2016.1227000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. H. (2017). Second screening politics in the social media sphere: Advancing research on dual screen use in political communication with evidence from 20 countries. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61(2), 193–219. doi:10.1080/08838151.2017.1309420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasso, M. T. (2014). Age, period and cohort analysis in a comparative context: Political generations and political participation repertoires in Western Europe. Electoral Studies, 33, 63–76. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2013.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2014.962683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, S. (2018). Global digital report. We are social. Retrieved from https://wearesocial.com/blog/2018/01/global-digital-report-2018
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Hsu, S. H., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2013). Influence of social media use on discussion network heterogeneity and civic engagement: The moderating role of personality traits. Journal of Communication, 63(3), 498–516. doi:10.1111/jcom.12034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak, N., Williams, A., Wang, X., & Lee, H. (2005). Talking politics and engaging politics: An examination of the interactive relationships between structural features of political talk and discussion engagement. Communication Research, 32(1), 87–111. doi:10.1080/10584600490443877 doi: 10.1177/0093650204271400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, D. M., Kosicki, G. M., & McLeod, J. M. (2009). Political communication effects. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects, advances in theory and research (pp. 228–251). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mondak, J. J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D. A. L., & Nielsen, R. K. (2018). Reuters Institute digital news report. Oxford: Reuters Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2002). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2017, February). How Americans encounter, recall and act upon digital news. Retrieved from http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2017/02/08183209/PJ_2017.02.09_Experiential_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2018, March). Social media use in 2018. Retrieved from http://pewresearch.org/
   Google Scholar
• Quan-Haase, A., & Young, A. L. (2010). Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science Technology & Society, 30(5), 350–361. doi: 10.1177/0270467610380009
   Google Scholar
• Quintelier, E., & Vissers, S. (2008). The effect of internet use on political participation: An analysis of survey results for 16-year-olds in Belgium. Social Science Computer Review, 26(4), 411–427. doi: 10.1177/0894439307312631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas, H., & Puig-i-Abril, E. (2009). Mobilizers mobilized: Information, expression, mobilization and participation in the digital age. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 902–927. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01475.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, C. (2014). Anti-politics in action? Measurement dilemmas in the study of unconventional political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 67(3), 574–588. doi: 10.1177/1065912914530513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Eveland, W. P., & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32(5), 531–565. doi: 10.1177/0093650205279209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, D. V., Kwak, N., & Holbert, R. L. (2001). “Connecting” and “disconnecting” with civic life: Patterns of internet use and the production of social capital. Political Communication, 18(2), 141–162. doi: 10.1080/105846001750322952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, D. V., McLeod, D. M., Rojas, H., Cho, J., Wagner, M. W., & Friedland, L. A. (2017). Revising the communication mediation model for a new political communication ecology. Human Communication Research, 43(4), 491–504. doi:10.1111/hcre.12115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z., & Wilson, C. (2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 363–379. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01629.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenzuela, S., Arriagada, A., & Scherman, A. (2012). The social media basis of youth protest behavior: The case of Chile. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 299–314. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01635.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenzuela, S., Correa, T., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2018). Ties, likes, and tweets: Using strong and weak ties to explain differences in protest participation across Facebook and Twitter use. Political Communication, 35(1), 117–134. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2017.1334726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valeriani, A., & Vaccari, C. (2018). Political talk on mobile instant messaging services: A comparative analysis of Germany, Italy, and the UK. Information, Communication & Society, 21(11), 1715–1731. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1350730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, B. E., Ardèvol-Abreu, A., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2017). Online influence? Social media use, opinion leadership, and political persuasion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(2), 214–239. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edv050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xenos, M., Vromen, A., & Loader, B. D. (2014). The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 151–167. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.871318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, S. W., Kim, J. W., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2017). Cognitive benefits for senders: Antecedents and effects of political expression on social media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(1), 17–37. doi:10.1177/1077699016654438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar