‘Delete the family’: platform families and the colonisation of the smart home

References

• Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In J. L. Wiebe & E. Bijker (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205–225). Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amazon. (2018). Amazon teen: Parent information. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/cr/parentLanding
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (1987). Legislators and interpreters: On modernity, post-modernity and intellectuals. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, D. (2016). Metric power (1st ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, D., & Burrows, R. (2007). Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: Some initial considerations. Sociological Research Online, 12(5), 1–13. doi:10.5153/sro.1560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things Out. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowlby, S., Gregory, S., & McKie, L. (1997). “Doing home”: Patriarchy, caring, and space. Women’s Studies International Forum, 20(3), 343–350. doi: 10.1016/S0277-5395(97)00018-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, E., & Locke, H. J. (1945). The family: From institution to companionship. New York: American Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Çalışkan, K., & Callon, M. (2010). Economization, part 2: A research programme for the study of markets. Economy and Society, 39(1), 1–32. doi: 10.1080/03085140903424519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, M. (1999). Brothers and sisters, uncles and aunts: A lateral perspective on Caribbean families. In E. Silva, & C. Smart (Eds.), The new family? (pp. 129–142). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, D. (2012). A sociology of family life (1st ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2018). Data colonialism: Rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media. doi: 10.1177/1527476418796632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crabtree, A., Lodge, T., Colley, J., Greenhalgh, C., Mortier, R., & Haddadi, H. (2016). Enabling the new economic actor: Data protection, the digital economy, and the Databox. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 20(6), 947–957. doi: 10.1007/s00779-016-0939-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, M. (2019, February 12). Your smart light can tell amazon and Google when you go to bed. Bloomberg. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-02-12/your-smart-light-can-tell-amazon-and-google-when-you-go-to-bed
   Google Scholar
• Dingwall, R., & Robinson, K. M. (1990). Policing the family? Health visiting and the public surveillance of private behavior. In J. Gubrium & A. Sankar (Eds.), The home care experience: Ethnography and policy (pp. 253–273). Retrieved from http://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/13979/
   Google Scholar
• Donzelot, J. (1997). The Policing of families. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finch, J. (2007). Displaying families. Sociology, 41(1), 65–81. doi: 10.1177/0038038507072284
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1992). The Transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love, and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsack, L. (1999). A haven in a heartless home? Women and domestic violence. In T. Chapman & J. Hockey (Eds.), Ideal homes?: Social change and domestic life (pp. 121–132). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Google. (2018). Create a family on Google - Google for families help. Retrieved from https://support.google.com/families/answer/7103337?hl=en&ref_topic=7327570
   Google Scholar
• Goulden, M., Tolmie, P., Mortier, R., Lodge, T., Pietilainen, A.-K., & Teixeira, R. (2018). Living with interpersonal data: Observability and accountability in the age of pervasive ICT. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1580–1599. doi:10.1177/1461444817700154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hareven, T. K. (1991). The home and the family in historical perspective. Social Research, 58(1), 253–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasson, E. (2006). Wedded to ‘fault’: The legal regulation of divorce and relationship breakdown. Legal Studies, 26(2), 267–290. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2006.00011.x
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, L. (1999). Intimacy transformed? A critical look at the ‘pure relationship’. Sociology, 33(3), 477–494. doi: 10.1177/S0038038599000310
   Google Scholar
• Langley, P., & Leyshon, A. (2017). Platform capitalism: The intermediation and capitalization of digital economic circulation. Finance and Society, 3(1), 11–31. doi: 10.2218/finsoc.v3i1.1936
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2009). Seeing like a survey. Cultural Sociology, 3(2), 239–256. doi:10.1177/1749975509105533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallett, S. (2004). Understanding home: A critical review of the literature. The Sociological Review, 52(1), 62–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2004.00442.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marres, N. (2010). Frontstaging nonhumans: Publicity as a constraint on the political activity of things. In B. Braun & S. Whatmore (Eds.), Political matter, technoscience, democracy, and public life (pp. 177–210). Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. (1996). Family connections: An introduction to family studies. Cambridge, UK : Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. (2004). Everyday life and family practices. In E. Silva, & T. Bennett (Eds.), Contemporary culture and everyday life (pp. 37–51). Durham: Sociologypress.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, A. (1984). The sociology of Housework (2nd Revised ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Oudshoorn, N., Rommes, E., & Stienstra, M. (2004). Configuring the user as everybody: Gender and design cultures in information and communication technologies. Science, Technology & Human Values, 29(1), 30–63. doi: 10.1177/0162243903259190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1956). The American family. Its relations to personality and to the social structure. In T. Parsons, & R. F. Bales (Eds.), Family socialisation and interaction process (pp. 13–33). London: Routeldge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1956). Family socialisation and interaction process. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Postigo, H. (2012). Cultural production and the digital rights movement. Information, Communication & Society, 15(8), 1165–1185. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.568509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quijano, A. (2007). Coloniality and modernity/rationality. Cultural Studies, 21(2--3), 168–178. doi:10.1080/09502380601164353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, cleanliness and convenience: The social organization of normality. Milton Keynes: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstone, R., & Hirsch, E. (Eds.). (1994). Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces (1st ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, C., & Neale, B. (1998). Family Fragments? Malden, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe, A. L. (1963). Institutions of privacy in the Determination of police Administrative practice. American Journal of Sociology, 69(2), 150–160. doi: 10.1086/223544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strengers, Y. (2014). ). Smart energy in everyday life: Are you designing for resource man? | ACM Interactions. ACM Interactions. Retrieved from http://interactions.acm.org/archive/view/july-august-2014/smart-energy-in-everyday-life-are-you-designing-for-resource-man
   Google Scholar
• Strengers, Y., & Nicholls, L. (2018). Aesthetic pleasures and gendered tech-work in the 21st-century smart home. Media International Australia, 166(1), 70–80. doi: 10.1177/1329878X17737661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanczer, L., Parkin, S., Danezis, G., & Patel, T. (2018). Gender and IoT. Retrieved from https://www.ucl.ac.uk/steapp/research/projects/digital-policy-lab/dpl-projects/gender-and-iot
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2016). What is the future? ( Paperback Octavo edition). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, D. (1990). Uncoupling: The turning points in intimate relationships ( Vintage Books ed edition). New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wardhaugh, J. (1999). The unaccommodated woman: Home, homelessness and identity. The Sociological Review, 47(1), 91–109. doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.00164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, J. (1985). Sexuality and its discontents: Meanings, myths, and modern sexualities (1st ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, B. (2018). Foreword: The family has become a Nework. In B. Neves & C. Casimiro (Eds.), Connecting families? Information and communication technologies, generations, and the life course. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, F. (2004). Rethinking families. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M., & Willmott, P. (1962). Family and kinship in East London. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar