Is the smartphone always a smart choice? Against the utilitarian view of the ‘connected migrant’

References

• Alencar, A., Kondova, K., & Ribbens, W. (2018). The smartphone as a lifeline: An exploration of refugees’ use of mobile communication technologies during their flight. Media, Culture & Society. Advanced online publication. doi: 10.1177/0163443718813486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allsopp, J. (2017). Agent, victim, soldier, son: Intersecting masculinities in the European “refugee crisis”. In J. Freedman, Z. Kivilcim, & N. Ozgur Baklacıoğlu (Eds.), A gendered approach to the Syrian refugee crisis (pp. 155–175). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, M. (2003). On the phenomenology of technology: The “Janus-faces” of mobile phones. Information and Organization, 13, 231–256.
   Google Scholar
• Baban, F., Ilcan, S., & Rygiel, K. (2017). Syrian refugees in Turkey: Pathways to precarity, differential inclusion, and negotiated citizenship rights. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43, 41–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banki, S. (2015). Precarity of place: A complement to the growing precariat literature. In M. Johnson (Ed.), Precariat: Labour, work and politics (pp. 66–82). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brunwasser, M. (2015, August 25). A 21st-century migrant’s essentials: Food, shelter, smartphone. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/26/world/europe/a-21st-century-migrants-checklist-water-shelter-smartphone.html
   Google Scholar
• Crawley, H., & Skleparis, D. (2018). Refugees, migrants, neither, both: Categorical fetishism and the politics of bounding in Europe’s ‘migration crisis’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44, 48–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker, R., Engbersen, G., Klaver, J., & Vonk, H. (2018). Smart refugees. How Syrian asylum migrants use social media information in migration decision-making. Social Media+Society. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/2056305118764439
   Google Scholar
• Diminescu, D. (2008). The connected migrant: An epistemological manifesto. Social Science Information, 47, 565–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018). Digital economy and society index 2018. Country report The Netherlands. Brussels: European Union. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/scoreboard/netherlands
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou, M. (2018). Does the subaltern speak? Migrant voices in digital Europe. Popular Communication, 16, 45–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, M., Osseiran, S., & Cheesman, M. (2018). Syrian refugees and the digital passage to Europe: Smartphone infrastructures and affordances. Social Media+Society. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/2056305118764440
   Google Scholar
• Habekuß, F., & Schmitt, S. (2015, October 1). Why do you need a mobile phone? Zeit Online. Retrieved from https://www.zeit.de/gesellschaft/zeitgeschehen/2015-09/smartphones-mobil-phones-refugees-help
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. A., & Baym, N. K. (2012). Calling and texting (too much): Mobile maintenance expectations, (over) dependence, entrapment, and friendship satisfaction. New Media & Society, 14, 316–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harney, N. (2013). Precarity, affect and problem solving with mobile phones by asylum seekers, refugees and migrants in Naples, Italy. Journal of Refugee Studies, 26, 541–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Lang, K. R. (2005). Managing the paradoxes of mobile technology. Information Systems Management, 22, 7–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J. E., & Aakhus, M. (Eds.). (2002). Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, K. (2018). The smartphone as a snapshot of its use: Mobile media elicitation in qualitative interviews. Mobile Media & Communication, 6, 233–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoury, R. B. (2015). Sweet tea and cigarettes: A taste of refugee life in Jordan. Forced Migration Review, 49, 93–94.
   Google Scholar
• Latonero, M., & Kift, P. (2018). On digital passages and borders: Refugees and the new infrastructure for movement and control. Social Media+Society. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/2056305118764432
   Google Scholar
• Leurs, K. (2014). The politics of transnational affective capital: Digital connectivity among young Somalis stranded in Ethiopia. Crossings: Journal of Migration and Culture, 5, 87–104.
   Google Scholar
• Leurs, K., & Ponzanesi, S. (2018). Connected migrants: Encapsulation and cosmopolitanization. Popular Communication, 16, 4–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leurs, K., & Smets, K. (2018). Five questions for digital migration studies: Learning from digital connectivity and forced migration in(to) Europe. Social Media+Society. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/2056305118764425
   Google Scholar
• Lindt, S. (2018, October 7). Refugees need phone credit almost as much as food and water. The Independent. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/happylist/refugees-need-phone-credit-almost-as-much-as-food-and-water-a8572611.html
   Google Scholar
• Ling, R. (2016). Soft coercion: Reciprocal expectations of availability in the use of mobile communication. First Monday, 21(9). doi: 10.5210/fm.v21i9.6814
   Google Scholar
• Madianou, M. (2014). Smartphones as polymedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 667–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2012). Migration and new media: Transnational families and polymedia. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Malkki, L. H. (1995a). Purity and exile: Violence, memory, and national cosmology among Hutu refugees in Tanzania. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malkki, L. H. (1995b). Refugees and exile: From ‘refugee studies’ to the national order of things. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 495–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nawyn, S. (2010). Gender and migration: Integrating feminist theory into migration studies. Sociology Compass, 4, 749–765.
   Google Scholar
• Over 1 million arrivals in Europe by sea: UNHCR. (2015, December 30). Business standard. Retrieved from https://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/over-1-million-arrivals-in-europe-by-sea-unhcr-115123000668_1.html
   Google Scholar
• Parekh, S. (2017). Refugees and the ethics of forced displacement. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ponzanezi, S., & Leurs, K. (2014). On digital crossings in Europe. Crossings: Journal of Migration and Culture, 5, 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Risam, R. (2018). Now you see them: Self-representation and the refugee selfie. Popular Communication, 16, 58–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smets, K. (2018). The way Syrian refugees in Turkey use media: Understanding “connected refugees” through a non-mediacentric and local approach. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 43, 113–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ticktin, M. (2016). Thinking beyond humanitarian borders. Social Research, 83, 255–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, S. (2000). Vindicating masculinity: The fate of promoting gender equality. Forced Migration Review, 9, 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Twigt, M. A. (2018). The mediation of hope: Digital technologies and affective affordances within Iraqi refugee households in Jordan. Social Media+Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/2056305118764426.
   Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. (2004). Cheap calls: The social glue of migrant transnationalism. Global Networks, 4, 219–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, M., Campbell, M. O., & Janbek, D. (2017). Syrian refugees and information precarity. New Media & Society, 19, 240–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willson, M. A. (2012). Being-together: Thinking through technologically mediated sociality and community. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 9, 279–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witteborn, S. (2011). Constructing the forced migrant and the politics of space and place-making. Journal of Communication, 61, 1142–1160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witteborn, S. (2014). Forced migrants, emotive practice and digital heterotopia. Crossings: Journal of Migration & Culture, 5, 73–85.
   Google Scholar
• Witteborn, S. (2015). Becoming (im)perceptible: Forced migrants and virtual practice. Journal of Refugee Studies, 28, 350–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witteborn, S. (2018). The digital force in forced migration: Imagined affordances and gendered practices. Popular Communication, 16, 21–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zijlstra, J., & Van Liempt, I. (2017). Smart(phone) travelling: Understanding the use and impact of mobile technology on irregular migration journeys. International Journal of Migration and Border Studies, 3, 174–191.
   Google Scholar