1,495
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Serial participants of social media climate discussion as a community of practice: a longitudinal network analysis

, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 941-959 | Received 23 Apr 2019, Accepted 10 Sep 2019, Published online: 24 Sep 2019

References

  • Bastos, M. T., & Mercea, D. (2016). Serial activists: Political Twitter beyond influentials and the twittertariat. New Media & Society, 18(10), 2359–2378. doi: 10.1177/1461444815584764
  • Bastos, M. T., Raimundo, R. L. G., & Travitzki, R. (2013). Gatekeeping Twitter: Message diffusion in political hashtags. Media, Culture & Society, 35(2), 260–270. doi: 10.1177/0163443712467594
  • Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
  • Bennett, W. L., Segerberg, A., & Walker, S. (2014). Organization in the crowd: Peer production in large-scale networked protests. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 232–260. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.870379
  • Block, P. (2015). Reciprocity, transitivity, and the mysterious three-cycle. Social Networks, 40, 163–173. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2014.10.005
  • Bonacich, P. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2(1), 113–120. doi: 10.1080/0022250X.1972.9989806
  • Bonacich, P. (2007). Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality. Social Networks, 29(4), 555–564. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2007.04.002
  • Borgatti, S. P. (2005). Centrality and network flow. Social Networks, 27(1), 55–71. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.008
  • Brown, M. E., Ihli, M., Hendrick, O., Delgado-Arias, S., Escobar, V. M., & Griffith, P. (2016). Social network and content analysis of the North American carbon program as a scientific community of practice. Social Networks, 44, 226–237. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2015.10.002
  • Caniglia, B. (2001). Informal alliances vs. Institutional ties: The effects of elite alliances on environmental TSMO networks. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 6(1), 37–54. doi: 10.17813/maiq.6.1.q472686m21w4w368
  • Contractor, N. S., Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (2006). Testing multi-theoretical multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytic framework and empirical example. Academy of Management Review, 31, 681–703. doi: 10.5465/amr.2006.21318925
  • Davis, J. A., & Leinhardt, S. (1970). The structure of positive interpersonal relations in small groups. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (pp. 218–251). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Diani, M., & McAdam, D. (2003). Social movements and networks: Relational approaches to collective action. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
  • Duffy, B. E., & Wissinger, E. (2017). Mythologies of creative work in the social media age: Fun, free, and “just being me”. International Journal of Communication, 11(1), 4652–4671.
  • Freelon, D., McIlwain, C., & Clark, M. (2018). Quantifying the power and consequences of social media protest. New Media & Society, 20(3), 990–1011. doi: 10.1177/1461444816676646
  • Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
  • Freeman, L. C., Borgatti, S. P., & White, D. R. (1991). Centrality in valued graphs: A measure of betweenness based on network flow. Social Networks, 13(2), 141–154. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(91)90017-N
  • Friedkin, N. E. (1991). Theoretical foundations for centrality measures. American journal of Sociology, 96(6), 1478–1504. doi: 10.1086/229694
  • Gilbert, S. (2016). Learning in a Twitter-based community of practice: An exploration of knowledge exchange as a motivation for participation in #hcsmca. Information, Communication & Society, 19(9), 1214–1232. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1186715
  • González-Bailón, S., Wang, N., Rivero, A., Borge-Holthoefer, J., & Moreno, Y. (2014). Assessing the bias in samples of large online networks. Social Networks, 38, 16–27. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2014.01.004
  • Halupka, M. (2014). Clicktivism: A systematic heuristic. Policy & Internet, 6(2), 115–132. doi: 10.1002/1944-2866.POI355
  • Hestres, L. E. (2014). Preaching to the choir: Internet-mediated advocacy, issue public mobilization, and climate change. New Media & Society, 16(2), 323–339. doi: 10.1177/1461444813480361
  • Hestres, L. E. (2015). Climate change advocacy online: Theories of change, target audiences, and online strategy. Environmental Politics, 24(2), 193–211. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2015.992600
  • Komorowski, M., Huu, T. D., & Deligiannis, N. (2018). Twitter data analysis for studying communities of practice in the media industry. Telematics and Informatics, 35, 195–212. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.11.001
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lewis, K., Gonzalez, M., & Kaufman, J. (2012). Social selection and peer influence in an online social network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(1), 68–72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109739109
  • Lim, M. (2013). Many clicks but little sticks: Social media activism in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43(4), 636–657. doi: 10.1080/00472336.2013.769386
  • Marsden, P. V. (2002). Egocentric and sociocentric measures of network centrality. Social Networks, 24(4), 407–422. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8733(02)00016-3
  • Mercea, D., & Bastos, M. T. (2016). Being a serial transnational activist. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(2), 140–155. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12150
  • Mercea, D., Karatas, D., & Bastos, M. T. (2018). Persistent activist communication in Occupy Gezi. Sociology, 52(5), 915–933. doi: 10.1177/0038038517695061
  • Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Obregón, R., & Tufte, T. (2017). Communication, social movements, and collective action: Toward a new research agenda in communication for development and social change. Journal of Communication, 67, 635–645. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12332
  • Rambaran, J. A., Dijkstra, J. K., Munniksma, A., & Cillessen, A. H. (2015). The development of adolescents’ friendships and antipathies: A longitudinal multivariate network test of balance theory. Social Networks, 43, 162–176. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2015.05.003
  • Robins, G., Elliott, P., & Pattison, P. (2001). Network models for social selection processes. Social Networks, 23(1), 1–30. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8733(01)00029-6
  • Schmidt, J. (2007). Blogging practices: An analytical framework. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1409–1427. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00379.x
  • Shulman, S. (2011). Discovertext: Software training to unlock the power of text. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual international digital government research conference: Digital government innovation in challenging times (pp. 373–373). New York, NY: ACM.
  • Snijders, T. A., Lomi, A., & Torló, V. (2013). A model for the multiplex dynamics of two-mode and one-mode networks, with an application to employment preference, friendship, and advice. Social Networks, 35(2), 265–276. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2012.05.005
  • Snijders, T. A. B., Van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32(1), 44–60. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004
  • Sobré-Denton, M. (2016). Virtual intercultural bridgework: Social media, virtual cosmopolitanism, and activist community-building. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1715–1731. doi: 10.1177/1461444814567988
  • Sommerfeldt, E., & Yang, A. (2017). Relationships as strategic issue management: A model of activist issue network strategies. Public Relations Review, 43(4), 829–839. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.06.012
  • Stephansen, H. C., & Couldry, N. (2014). Understanding micro-processes of community building and mutual learning on Twitter: A ‘small data’ approach. Information, Communication & Society, 17(10), 1212–1227. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.902984
  • Thorson, K., Edgerly, S., Kligler-Vilenchik, N., Xu, Y., & Wang, L. (2016). Seeking visibility in a big tent: Digital communication and the people’s climate March. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4785–4806.
  • Verbeke, G., & Molenberghs, G. (2009). Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35–57. doi: 10.2307/25148667
  • Weiss, S. A., & Domingo, D. (2010). Innovation processes in online newsrooms as actor-networks and communities of practice. New Media & Society, 12(7), 1156–1171. doi: 10.1177/1461444809360400
  • Wenger, E., MacDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
  • Yoo, T., & Lee, S. H. (2009). In search of social capital in state-activist capitalism: Elite networks in France and Korea. Organization Studies, 30(5), 529–547. doi: 10.1177/0170840609104397
  • Zappavigna, M. (2012). Discourse of Twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the Web. London: Continuum.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.